Illiteracy and Vulnerability to Alzheimer's Disease: Evaluation of Amyloid Pathology by PET Imaging

Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trial

— AVILL  

Official title:

Illiteracy and Vulnerability to Alzheimer's Disease: Evaluation of Amyloid Pathology by PET Imaging

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02494531
• Other study ID #: P120134
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 12, 2015
• Est. completion date: May 6, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: December 2020
• Source: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at two different stages (MCI and dementia) in illiterate subjects, using FDG- fluorodeoxyglucose - and florbetapir F 18 -PET imaging. This study will compare amyloid load and cerebral metabolism dysfunction in literate versus illiterate MCI and AD patients.

Description:

Illiterate, with a higher rate in the elder and in multi-cultural population reaching, then, 20%. Most of these patients are not usually included in research studies.

Thus, AVILL would specifically focus on lower educated and illiterate patients and on use of PET imaging for early diagnosis. This study would take advantage of the collaboration with the recently launched Memento cohort.

RATIONALE:

1. The diagnosis of AD at the early stages of the disease appears to be crucial. MCI is now considered as the 1st clinical stage of the disease, after a long pre-clinical period.

2. Cognitive reserve modulates the relationship between cerebral lesions and their clinical manifestations by limiting the negative impact of cerebral lesion on cognition. Education is a commonly-used proxy of cognitive reserve. Education interacts with AD pathology such that a greater pathological burden is required to show an effect on cognition among subjects with more education. Lower education and illiteracy are thus considered as risk factor of developing AD

3. Diagnosing MCI and AD in lower educated and illiterate patients is a real challenge because of:

1. -difficulties in cognitive evaluation which mostly relies on educational background and reading abilities,

2. -poor adaptation of neuropsychological tests,

3. -lack of clinical and imaging data concerning these patients, who are often excluded from studies, and poor knowledge of the evolution of the disease from the earlier signs (MCI) to dementia.

4. Quantification of amyloid deposit by PET imaging could therefore be useful for the diagnosis of AD in illiterate patients.

GENERAL OBJECTIVES:

• non educated patient amyloid load could differ from educated patient amyloid load at the same stage of cognitive impairment

• PET amyloid imaging using florbetapir F 18 could detect non educated patients with AD risk at early stage and could help clinical evaluation which is particularly difficult in this population.

• uptake level of florbetapir F 18 could be different in MCI and AD non educated patients compared to educated patients which are the basis of the objectives.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 45
• Est. completion date: May 6, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: May 6, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. For all patients enrolled in the study:

• Aged 18 years and above

• Visual and auditory acuity adequate for neuropsychological testing

• Having signed an informed consent

• Being affiliated to health insurance

2. For MCI patients:

For this group, the criteria are the same as those of Memento but with specially designed neuropsychological tests for illiterate/low educated patients.

• Performing worse than one standard deviation to the mean (compared to age and educational norms) in one or more cognitive domains (neuropsychological tests battery exploring memory, language, praxis, vision, executive functions); this deviation is required to be documented by tests performed less than 6 months age

• Clinical dementia Rating scale < or = 0.5

3. For AD patients

• Fulfilling DSM IV criteria of AD

• Clinical Dementia Rating scale > 0.5 Patients are defined as "illiterate" having 5 or less years of schooling, and "literate" when having more than 5 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Being under guardianship

• Residence in skilling nursing facility

• Pregnant or breast feeding women

• Alzheimer's disease caused by gene mutations

• Brain MRI exclusion criteria (pacemakers, aneurysm clips, artificial heart valves, ear implants, metal fragments or foreign objects in the eyes, skin, or body) or refusing MRI

• Neurological disease such as: treated epilepsy, treated Parkinson's disease, Huntington disease, brain tumour, subdural haematoma, progressive supranuclear palsy, history of head trauma followed by persistent neurological deficits, history of stroke

• Schizophrenia or other psychiatric history (DSM-IV criteria)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alzheimer Disease

Intervention

Radiation:
• Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET
Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET performed within 2 months
• florbetapir F 18-PET
florbetapir F 18-PET performed within 2 months

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Hospital Avicenne-Neurology	Bobigny

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Comparison of the amount of amyloid deposits using florbetapir-18 Fluor-PET between illiterate and literate MCI patients	Comparison between the 2 groups (educated and non -educated) of florbetapir-18 Fluor Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) ratios (max and mean of SUVr) in MCI patients	Within 2 months after inclusion
Secondary	Comparison of the amount of amyloid deposits using florbetapir-18 Fluor-PET between illiterate and literate AD patients,	Comparison of florbetapir-18 Fluor SUV (Standardized Uptake Values) ratios (max and mean of SUVr) in the different groups as defined above	Within 2 months after inclusion
Secondary	Comparison of the amyloid deposit location between the 2 groups (literate and illiterate)	Group comparison of qualitative topography of amyloid burden	Within 2 months after inclusion
Secondary	correlation between amyloid load and metabolism dysfunction using Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET in each groups	Group comparison of topography of amyloid deposit and FDG metabolism	Within 2 months after inclusion