Alveolar Socket Preservation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Bone Changes of The Extraction Sockets After Immediate Implant or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
Verified date | July 2021 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The amount of hard tissue resorption following tooth extraction involves prosthetically driven implant placement; therefore, the development of ridge preservation techniques that result in less alveolar bone loss is of great interest, Alveolar ridge preservation are indicated to decrease the loss of ridge volume that follows tooth extraction.However, they do not prevent bone resorption because, depending on the technique.The protocol of placing implants immediately upon tooth extraction has been introduced into clinical practice which aims to preserve the socket from resorption, also immediate implant satisfy the patient as it decrease the time for crown insertion in addition to that it has a good survival.There is not adequate research data to clearly demonstrate that flapless socket preservation techniques are superior to techniques that involve raising a flap, but an animal study reported that the detachment of the periosteum from the buccal site of the ridge leads to an increase of the resorption rate, resulting in an increase of the ridge resorption
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 32 |
Est. completion date | March 30, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | December 30, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age: Above 18 years. 2. Patients with single non-restorable teeth in anterior or premolar area. 3. Patients with adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure. 4. Patients with good oral hygiene 5. Patient consent approval and signing. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Heavy smokers. 2. Systemic disease that contraindicates surgical implant placement 3. Presence of any acute pathosis at the site of surgery. 4. Patients with thin alveolar ridge. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Amr Mohamed Shaarawi | Mansoura |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Egypt,
Aimetti M, Manavella V, Corano L, Ercoli E, Bignardi C, Romano F. Three-dimensional analysis of bone remodeling following ridge augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Feb;29(2):202-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13099. Epub 2017 Nov 17. — View Citation
Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666. Epub 2017 Jan 31. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Bone volume changes | volumetric bone changes by cone-beam computed tomography | 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04149080 -
Effects of Simvastatin Gel on Bone Neoformation in Post-extraction Sockets: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02300246 -
Clinical, Histological and Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of Neoformed Tissue in Post-extraction Sockets Covered With Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) Membrane: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 1 |