Comparison of the Use of Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes in Dental Implants — BSNS  

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Clinical Trial

Official title: Effectiveness of Two Bone Substitutes, Natural and Synthetic, in Preserving the Alveolar Ridge of Single-rooted Teeth: a Pilot Single-blind, Parallel Randomised Controlled Trial

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of a natural and synthetic bone substitute in preserving the alveolar ridge (bone) of a single- rooted tooth after an extraction. The main question it aims to answer: Is there a difference between natural (Bio-Oss®) and synthetic (Bonalive®) bone substitutes in preserving the alveolar ridge dimensions based on changes in the width of the alveolar ridge (expressed in millimetres) from augmentation (baseline) to 24-week follow-up (post augmentation)? Participants will have a tooth extraction and a bone substitute will be inserted into their socket immediately after. Participants will be divided into two equal groups and those in group A will receive Bio-Oss® while those in group B will receive Bonalive®. In both groups measurements of the alveolar bone will be taken when the bone substitute is inserted and 24 weeks after the insertion of the bone substitute. These measurements will be used to compare the effectiveness of Bio-Oss® and Bonalive in preserving the alveolar bone of a tooth after an extraction.

Clinical Trial Description

It is a pilot single-blind two-arm parallel randomised control trial that aims to assess the differences between two bone substitutes, natural versus synthetic. The study will mimic the routine practice, and patients will be randomly allocated to receive either natural (control) or synthetic (intervention) bone substitutes. The patient follow-up period will be 24 weeks from the baseline data collection point. The University of Central Lancashire will lead the study in collaboration with Imperial College London and dental clinics in Midlands, Southeast and Northwest England. We will recruit 34 patients who require tooth extractions and divide them into two equal groups. Patients in group A will receive Bio-Oss® , while those in group B will receive Bonalive® For both groups, the bone substitute will be inserted immediately after an extraction, and the socket will be sealed with a membrane sutured in place. Patients in both groups will be reviewed after 2 weeks to remove the suture. Patients will have another review at 24 weeks, during which the researcher will take a scan or mould, a photograph, and a small biopsy sample of the area where the bone substitute was placed. Measurements obtained at the 24-week follow-up will be used to evaluate the effectiveness and differences between natural and synthetic bone substitutes in preserving the bone supporting a tooth after an extraction. The results of this pilot study will inform the design and implementation of a full-scale randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of bioactive glass-derived bone compared with bovine-derived bone in preserving the alveolar bone of a tooth after an extraction ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

• NCT number: NCT05938114
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of Central Lancashire
• Contact: FADI BARRAK, MBBS; BDS
• Phone: +441772201201
• Email: fnbarrak@uclan.ac.uk
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2024
• Completion date: July 2024