Dental Implants Clinical Trial
Official title:
Phase 2 Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Injectable Brushite Bone Cement in Bone Augmentation and Dental Implant Stabilization
Objective: The evaluation of "PD" VitalOs Cement, an injectable brushite, as a stabilizer of
dental implants and a potential source for bone augmentation.
Methods: Forty (40) patients needing dental implants will be treated where needed with "PD"
VitalOs Cement gapping half of their sites whereas the other half will be gapped with
Bio-oss demineralized bone and BioGuide membrane.
Bone fractures or bone loss in specific sites are cases where a bone graft is sometimes
needed to provide bone augmentation. For bone fractures, these are typically metaphyseal or
maxillofacial fractures with risk of malunion or non-union. Bone loss can happen under
various circumstances: it can be a consequence of a systemic disease like osteoporosis or of
a surgical intervention like the extraction of a tooth or the removal of a bone cyst or
tumor.
When a bone graft is required the gold standard still widely used is autogenous cancellous
bone. However, the graft harvesting procedure is invasive and increases patient morbidity
(lengthened surgical procedure, increased risk of infection). Moreover, the availability of
autologous grafts is limited, especially in elderly patients. This has been the rationale
for studying alternative sources for bone grafts.
The first alternative is allografts: they are usually obtained from cadavers. The advantages
include elimination of a patient donor site, hence reduced surgical time and decreased blood
loss and risk of infection. The principal shortcomings are the availability, the possible
rejection of the graft and the risk of disease transmission.
Grafts of animal origin (xenografts) are also an option, even though not totally risk-free
when it comes to disease transmission.
A third alternative to autologous bone is to use synthetic materials. Extensive research has
been performed to develop such materials since the 80's. The majority of them are based on
calcium phosphate compounds, made up of the same ions as those of the natural mineral phase
of bone. These products are readily available, eliminate the risk of disease transmission or
immunogenic response (allografts) and bypass the need for an additional surgical procedure
(autografts). These materials are presented under either of the three forms: granules,
pre-formed blocks or cements.
Granules and pre-formed blocks are generally made up of β-TCP, Hydroxyapatite (HA), or a mix
of both. Depending mainly on their chemical composition, their manufacturing process and
their porosity, they degrade more or less rapidly.
Calcium phosphate cements consist generally of a liquid and a powder which harden upon
mixing. The final product phase can be hydroxyapatite, or another calcium phosphate phase
like dahllite or brushite. The advantage of cements over pre-formed blocks is that they can
be injected, shaped and hardened in situ, ensuring optimum bone-implant contact and
minimally invasive surgery. Once hardened, they exhibit cohesive properties that granules
cannot provide. Most of the calcium phosphate cements available on the market are
hydroxyapatite cements. However, for some applications like periodontitis or peri-implant
gap filling, their resorption rate is too slow, hampering their clinical applicability for
these indications. The advantage of the brushite phase in the hardened cement is that it
degrades faster than hydroxyapatite, allowing a more rapid bone regeneration. The purpose of
this study is to evaluate the efficacy of "PD" VitalOs Cement as a primary stabilizer and
bone augmenting source in dental implantology.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05466006 -
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Volume Changes at Small Buccal Dehiscences
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00313989 -
Evaluation of Osseo-integration After Placement of Dental Implants With Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Buccopharyngeal Oncology
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05081050 -
Short Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region
|
||
Completed |
NCT04707677 -
Comparative Aesthetic Analysis Between Titanium and Ceramic Implants
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05989061 -
PEEK Versus Titanium Customized Healing Abutments
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05722041 -
Soft Tissue Volume Changes in Posterior Socket Sealing Abutment.
|
||
Completed |
NCT05512845 -
The Double Factor Technique: a Computer-guided Implant Surgery Technique for Fully Edentulous Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03837158 -
Titanium Zirconium (TiZr) Mini Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01944267 -
Procedures for Improving the Mucosa Around Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00971516 -
Healing Profile of Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Patients With Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04305080 -
Effect of Anodic Oxidation of Implant Abutment Collar on the Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06191510 -
Xenogenic Bone Intentionally Left Exposed
|
||
Completed |
NCT04459494 -
In the Treatment of Implants With Different Methods; Early Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05644470 -
Association of Implant Position and Crown Contour With Tissue Health
|
||
Completed |
NCT05101954 -
Platelet Rich Fibrin and Concentrated Growth Factors on Osseointegration of Immediate Implants
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05748379 -
Atraumatic Zirconia Abutment Versus Customized Composite Healing Abutment in Maxilla or Mandible.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05627037 -
Marginal Bone Level Around Titanium Implants Produced by Additive Manufacture
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06187805 -
Retrospective Case Series - OSSIX Volumax Collagen Xenograft Scaffolding
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06100120 -
A Triple-blinded Non-inferiority Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Hybrid and Fully Etched Implants P1
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06155799 -
Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement
|
N/A |