View clinical trials related to Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.
Filter by:Clinicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of reconstructing the alveolar ridge as more patients desire fixed implant-supported restorations. Reconstruction of large horizontal alveolar defects still remains a challenge in implantology. Although autogenous blocks from intraoral sites are proven effective for such defects, donor site morbidity and limited graft availability are major limitations. Allogenic bone blocks have been proposed to overcome these limitations, however, the outcomes reported in the literature are inconclusive. In this case series, the efficacy of allogenic blocks for lateral augmentation of atrophic ridges was evaluated, over a three-year period. In nineteen edentulous sites from ten patients, cortico-cancellous allogenic blocks (PHOENIX, TBF, France) were shaped to the defect and screw-fixated. A double-layer of autogenous chips and demineralized bovine bone (Bio-Oss, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) was used to fill the voids. The augmented site was covered by non-cross-linked collagen membrane (Bio-Gide, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland). After a healing period of 9 months, implants were placed and CBCT analysis was performed post-implantation. Following a period of 34 months of function (range 22 to 44 months), patients were clinically and radiographically re-examined.
aim Evaluation of the amount of bone gain following Ridge augmentation using tunneling technique in atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mixed with particulated autogenous bone chips with collagen membrane
Narrow alveolar ridges with a thickness equal or less than 5 mm requires bone augmentation procedures before or at the time of implant placement. (Anitua, Begoña, and Orive 2013) Several surgical techniques have been utilized for the reconstruction of deficient alveolar ridges such as block onlay graft augmentation, guided bone regeneration, distraction osteogenesis , ridge splitting and/or ridge expansion(McAllister and Haghighat 2007). A new bone drilling technique named Osseodensification facilitates horizontal ridge expansion. Studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of osseodensification as a lateral ridge augmentation procedure that aims at increasing the thickness of atrophic ridges, thus maintaining ridge integrity and allowing for implant placement with enhanced stability. The null hypothesis Proposes no difference in the bone width gain following the osseodensification drilling system compared to the ridge splitting technique with simultaneously placed implants in narrow alveolar ridges.
This study will evaluate the effect of allograft bone particle size on the bone quantity and quality following socket grafting and lateral ridge augmentation in preparation for endosseous implant placement. Pre (baseline)- and post-grafting (3 months for sockets and 6 months for edentulous ridges) clinical as well as 2- and 3-dimensional radiographic measurements will be used to evaluate the differences between sites grafted with small vs. large particle sized bone allografts. Histological analysis will be performed at time of surgical re-entry of grafted sites to place the dental implants, and assessed for differences in new bone formation between the 2 types of grafts.
This randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial study was designed to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy on bone healing in patients with bilateral sinus lifting and simultaneous dental implant application. Maxillary posterior partially edentulous or totally edentulous twelve patients who need bilateral sinus bone augmentation were included in this study. Sinus bone augmentation and dental implant surgeries were done simultaneously. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) was (λ= 630-660 nm, 25 mw / cm², 6 mins) applied for just one operation side at first, third, fifth and seventh days. Treatment side were randomly selected by another surgeon who applied LLLT. Panoramic radiographs were taken at the first, third and sixth months using aluminum step-wedge technique. Optic Density analyses were performed using Cardinal Health Digital Densitometer (Fluke Biomedical 07-443) with 1mm diameter. Digital densitometric results were obtained as equivalent aluminum thickness for each radiograph. These data were used to evaluate changes in optical bone densitometry and compare the LLLT applied side and control side for each patient.
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures have significantly evolved over the last 20 years. Significant advances have been made with various barrier membranes with or without the use of bone grafts and other materials. Some of the main limitations of non-resorbable barriers included cytotoxicity and need for removal, which can adversely affect the regenerated bone volume. Similar GBR success has been documented extensively with cell occlusive resorbable barriers membranes. Recently, the investigators demonstrated supracrestal bone regeneration in guided tissue regeneration procedures in humans with the use of novel perforated barrier membrane (MPM). The perforation allows mesenchymal stem cells and other progenitor cells present in the gingival tissues to migrate into the osseous defect and contribute to the osseous regeneration potential. The objective of this study is to investigate the GBR potential of MPM in alveolar ridge defects, relative to a similar occlusive barrier. Ten non-smoking patients that need localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to implant placement will be included into the study. Patients will be divided into two groups, as follows: occlusive bovine collagen membrane (OM control group, 5 patients) and modified bovine perforated collagen membrane (MPM test group, 5 patients). All sites will be grafted with mineralized cortical bone allograft and when needed cortical bone pins will be use for site stability. A Cone Bean (CT) will be obtained prior to surgery and 6-8 months post treatment from which volumetric width changes will be quantify. A bone biopsy will be obtained at the time of implant placement (~6-8 months) to determine residual graft particles and new bone formation. Dimensional width changes will be assess at 6-8 months during re-entry for implant placement. Soft tissue healing will be assessed at 2, 4, 8, 16 weeks and 6 months. This study can potentially impact current bone augmentation techniques and may lead to the modification of existing commercial membranes that will enhance site development prior to implant placement. The contribution of progenitor cells to the osseous defect might lead to greater bone formation and possible faster wound healing.
This study is designed to compare the clinical and histologic results of ridge augmentation with and without primary closure over the barrier membrane. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in crestal ridge width between the two groups.
1. Evaluation of dimensional changes in alveolar ridge following immediate implantation compared to delayed implantation 2. evaluation of the effect of gap dimensions between socket walls and dental implant in implant stability
Edentulism refers to a state of full or partial lack of teeth. This situation may interfere with essential functions such as mastication, speech and even appearance. Dental implants inserted to the mandible or maxilla is a common treatment modality aiming to restore edentulus alveolar ridges by providing support and anchorage for removable or fixed dental prosthesis.There are cases which in addition to a lack of teeth suffer from lack of sufficient bone tissue volume to support the dental implant.A situation like this may originate from a variety of reasons such as residual bone atrophy, prior alveolar bone destruction due to periodontal disease and even a traumatic tooth extraction. In such cases, a routine alveolar bone augmentation is done to enable a dental implant installation at this site.Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely used technique used to augment edentulus bone ridges. It relies on an inert membrane covering a bone substitute placed over the bony site requiring augmentation. The bone substitute provides a scaffold to alveolar regeneration by the host's osteoblasts while the membrane prevents unwanted epithelial cells to migrate to the bony defect area. The investigators research is a aimed to preform a follow up after patients who already went through a GBR procedure and before inserting a dental implant. Patients answering the inclusion but not the exclusion criteria will go through an alveolar computerized tomography (C.T) done routinely before inserting dental implants.At the day of Dental implantation - residual bone left from the site of implantation (after preparing the site with a trephine bur) will be taken to a histological analysis. The results from the C.T and the histological examination will be analyzed for bone quantity (volume) and quality and will allow a comparison of bone characteristics obtained by using different routinely used bone substitutes.
The primary objective is the area of newly formed bone (%) as assessed by histomorphometry with either MD05 or beta-TCP.