Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04204889 |
Other study ID # |
TOALS |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 1
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 17, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
August 2, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2024 |
Source |
University of Kansas Medical Center |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and the maximal tolerated dose of
Oxaloacetate (OAA) in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
Description:
Overview This is a safety and dose finding study looking at Oxaloacetate (OAA) in patients
with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). This study will aim to determine the maximal dose
that a subject can tolerate. The investigators will also learn how OAA affects mitochondria
in subjects with ALS. This is a 28-day study in which the investigators will attempt to
enroll approximately 24 participants. There is no placebo control.
Specific Aims (Hypothesis and Objectives)
The overall goal of this proposal is to determine if reducing mitochondrial stress is a
viable treatment strategy for ALS. This study will determine the maximal tolerated dose of
OAA and whether OAA improves biomarkers of mitochondrial stress. ALS is a progressive fatal
neurodegenerative disorder caused by loss of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.
Despite multiple clinical trials and advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of ALS,
riluzole and edaravone, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ALS drugs, the
former only extends life by a few months, and the latter possibly slows down functional
decline. Hence there is a clear need for new treatments for ALS.
While the exact underlying cause of this motor neuron degeneration remains uncertain,
candidate mechanisms include glutamate excitotoxicity, free radical-mediated oxidative
cytotoxicity, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, autoimmune processes, protein
aggregation, and cytoskeletal abnormalities. Mitochondrial dysfunction in particular may play
a critical role in ALS neurodegeneration, an observation supported by both human and animal
model studies. The characteristic pathological ALS finding of cytoplasmic inclusions (Bunina
bodies) in motor neuron cell bodies may represent mitochondria-containing autophagic
vacuoles. Functional studies of ALS mitochondria were also reported: calcium levels in motor
neuron synaptic terminals of ALS subjects were found to be elevated despite increased numbers
of local mitochondria, suggesting a defect of mitochondrial calcium sequestration; increased
complex I activity was seen with familial ALS; and reduced cytochrome oxidase activity was
shown in sporadic ALS patients. In mutant SOD mouse model, evidence of mitochondrial
dysfunction appears before motor neuron degeneration. Similar observations have been noted in
human sporadic ALS tissue. In humans with pathogenic mutations in TARDBP and C9ORF72,
mitochondrial functionality is abnormal in peripheral fibroblasts. The dexpramipexole trial
in ALS, while negative, is based on the mitochondrial ALS pathogenesis theory. The
investigators performed an open label study of rasagiline in ALS and demonstrated target
engagement of several blood mitochondrial biomarkers. KUMC completed an 80 patient randomized
controlled trial of rasagiline in ALS and again measured mitochondrial biomarkers.
Rationale: Human and animal studies suggest targeting mitochondrial dysfunction may be an
important approach to slow disease progression in ALS. Mitochondrial dysfunction can be seen
in both in vitro and in vivo experimental ALS models, may explain the characteristic Bunina
bodies, a key ALS pathological hallmark, and mitochondrial abnormalities are found in patient
autopsies. In cell models of mitochondrial dysfunction, OAA has been shown to be
cytoprotective. In addition, there is evidence that OAA, in preclinical studies in Alzheimer
disease, reduces neuroinflammation, another possible ALS pathological pathway. A phase 2
trial of OAA in in Alzheimer Disease is currently being conducted at KUMC but at a lower dose
than is proposed in this ALS study. The investigator is interested in OAA as a potential
therapeutic agent in ALS as it crosses the blood brain barrier, accesses motor neurons,
activates mitochondrial bioenergetics, increases respiratory capacity, and increases
glycolysis capacity. Preliminary data of OAA in an ALS mouse model at KUMC increased muscle
strength compared to untreated animals.
Hypothesis: OAA will be neuroprotective in ALS by reducing mitochondrial stress. This trial
will determine whether OAA is tolerable and whether it engages mitochondrial targets in ALS
patients. The result of this trial will lead to a larger phase II trial to further assess
safety and to begin to study efficacy in slowing the disease process. This short 28 day study
is too brief to study efficacy.
Specific Aim 1: To determine safety and the maximal tolerated dose of OAA in patients with
ALS. To achieve this aim, the investigator will conduct a prospective 3 + 3 dose escalating
clinical trial in up to 24 clinically definite, probable, or laboratory supported probable
ALS patients.
Sub-aim 1: The investigator will determine the pharmacokinetic profile of OAA in ALS
patients. The investigator will evaluate OAA drug levels in a pre-dose sample, 1 hour and 4
hours after dosing.
Specific Aim 2: To determine OAA target engagement. The investigator will evaluate a panel of
mitochondrial biomarkers, platelet TDP-43 levels and MR spectroscopy of brain glutathione, at
baseline then at the end of treatment and compare biomarker levels to dose, to evaluate
possible dose-response relationship in our biomarkers.
Future Aim: The goal is to use the results from this study to conduct a larger prospective
placebo controlled trial to determine if OAA is well tolerated and slows disease progression
in ALS using the maximal tolerated dose that will be determined during this current study
.