View clinical trials related to Allergic Rhinitis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Azelastine HCl-Fluticasone propionate Nasal Spray 137-50 mcg/spray compared to Dymista™ in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis
This is a Phase I/Ib, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of INI-2004, administered as single or multiple doses. This study will be conducted in two parts: Phase I single ascending dose (SAD) and Phase Ib multiple ascending dose (MAD).
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a non-infectious chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa mainly mediated by immunoglobulin E after exposure to allergens in atopic individuals. The typical symptoms of AR are paroxysmal sneezing, watery rhinorrhea, itching, and nasal congestion, which may be accompanied by ocular symptoms, including eye itching, tearing, redness, and burning sensation, which are more common in patients with hay fever allergies. Bronchial asthma is associated with bronchial asthma in 40% of patients with AR, suggesting a comorbid feature of allergic disease.
Allergic rhinitis is a chronic respiratory disorder affecting patients' quality of life and work performance. Pharmacists are identified as suitable professionals to deliver patient education and pharmaceutical care in managing allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. Local clinical practice guidelines in Malaysia are lacking, especially in pharmaceutical care in public healthcare institutions. This study protocol describes a randomised control trial (RCT) that aims to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led educational model in managing AR (AR-PRISE Model) compared to standard pharmaceutical care. The AR-PRISE model delivers patient educational material (video) and an algorithm for pharmaceutical care.
This randomized control trial study aims to know the effects of adding 2,5% Binahong extract on the effectiveness of NaCl 0.9% nasal irrigation in patients with allergic rhinitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How does the efficacy of Binahong Extract 2,5% with 0,9% NaCl to mRNA expression (IL-4, Il-6, IL-13, and TNF-α)? 2. How does the efficacy of Binahong Extract 2,5% with 0,9% NaCl to clinical symptoms? 3. How does the efficacy of Binahong Extract 2,5% with 0,9% NaCl to quality of life? 4. How does the efficacy of Binahong Extract 2,5% with 0,9% NaCl to physiology? Participants will use nasal irrigation two times daily for two weeks. Researchers will compare the nasal irrigation group using a combination of Binahong Extract 2,5% with the group using NaCl only to see the superior effect.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test AllerPops' effectiveness in people who suffer from allergic rhinitis. The main question[s]it aims to answer are: 1. To assess the effectiveness of AllerPops on relieving nasal symptoms compared to the control group in volunteers with seasonal/year-long allergies during the first 7 days of the 21-day intervention period. 2. To evaluate the safety of AllerPops administration in volunteers with seasonal/year-long allergies during a 21-day intervention period. Up to 30 days between Screening (V1) and Baseline (V2), and a 21-day intervention period, with dosing occurring every other day for a minimum of 3 doses, and thereafter until the participant is satisfied with the relief of the nasal allergy symptoms. The suitable season for the trial will be determined based on the seasonal variation measures. Researchers will compare slow and fast consuming groups to see if the way of use impact the effectiveness.
The aim of this study to compare the efficacy of Rhinophototherapy to Intranasal Corticosteroids on the the nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis patients. The main question to answer is: Does intranasal phototherapy reduce inflammation in the tissue biopsy of the inferior turbinate mucosa compared to intranasal steroids? The hypothesis for this study is Intranasal phototherapy will reduce mucosal inflammation without mucosal damage and is comparable to intranasal steroids in allergic rhinitis patients
Allergic rhinitis (AR) represents one of the most common global health problems with seriously increasing incidence over the last decades.The goal of the treatment of rhinitis is to prevent or reduce the symptoms through reduction of the inflammation of affected tissues. Acupuncture and pranayama yoga exercises had reported a significant improvement in daily symptoms and an increase of symptom-free days in many studies enrolling geriatric patients.
The aim of this clinical study is to compare the efficacy of Elonide Nasal Spray to Nasonex Nasal Spray and Placebo (non-active ingredient) in the management of allergic rhinitis. There are two hypotheses of this study: 1. Elonide nasal spray is same efficacy to Nasonex nasal spray. 2. Elonide nasal spray is more efficient to placebo.
This study is a multicenter, single arm, open-label phase II clinical study mainly evaluating the safety of CM310 in patients with allergic rhinitis.