View clinical trials related to Allergic Conjunctivitis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ST266 ophthalmic drops compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
This is a randomized, parallel, single center, double masked, vehicle controlled study. The purpose of this study is to determine the activity and safety of NS2 in patients with grass, tree or ragweed-pollen induced seasonal allergic conjunctivitis . Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive multiple doses of NS2 Ophthalmic Drops (0.5%) or NS2 Ophthalmic Drops Vehicle (0.0%). Free aldehydes are thought to be related to inflammatory conditions such as allergic conjunctivitis. NS2, a small molecule aldehyde trap, is being evaluated to determine whether it may decrease inflammation by lowering aldehyde levels.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate olopatadine 0.2% QD (once per day) compared to olopatadine 0.1% BID (twice per day) in the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
A Single-Center Evaluation of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Lastacaft ® as Measured by In-Vivo Confocal Microscopy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Olopatadine Hydrochloride (HCl) ophthalmic solution 0.1% versus Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in a population of healthy, adult Japanese patients (20 years of age or older) with a history of allergic conjunctivitis to Japanese Cedar Pollen. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive Olopatadine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.1% in one eye and Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in the fellow eye, after which a conjunctival allergy challenge (CAC) with Japanese cedar pollen will be performed.
This first-in-human (FIH) study is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of XmAb7195 in adult healthy volunteers and in adult subjects with elevated IgE levels.
This is a Phase II Single Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel, Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of EBI-005 Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Allergic Conjunctivitis Using an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model and Conjunctival Allergen Provocation Test (CAPT) Model. Approximately 150 subjects will be enrolled and randomized in one study center in Canada for a duration of 0.33 years.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate two investigational ophthalmic solutions for reduction in ocular redness in subjects with allergic conjunctivitis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of action of AC-170 0.24% compared to vehicle in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model.
Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is a widely used and effective treatment modality for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. SCIT starts with a build-up phase during which a patient receives frequent, escalating doses of the allergens they are allergic to until they reach a predetermined maintenance dose. This is followed by a maintenance phase during which the allergen dose is kept constant and administered at greater intervals. Maximum clinical improvement is generally not seen until a patient is in the maintenance phase. Anecdotal evidence of possible reactions to SCIT administered during a patient's pollen season has led to dosage freezes during a patient's pollen season which extends the length of the build-up phase by many months. Prolonging the buildup phase increases the time required to obtain maximal benefit from SCIT, and at the same time, can decrease patient compliance with therapy due to the prolonged period of time when frequent injections are required. The aims of this study are to determine if adverse reactions to pollen SCIT are increased if doses are increased during pollen season.