Efficacy/ Safety of Omalizumab in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Asthma and Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

Allergic Asthma Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Randomized, 20 Week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multiple-dose, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Combination With Depigoid, Versus Depigoid Only, in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Seasonal Allergic Asthma and Comorbid Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis - Open-label Depigoid Monotherapy Extension Periods 2007 and 2008-

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00396409
• Other study ID #: CIGE025ADE03
• Secondary ID: n.a.
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: November 6, 2006
• Last updated: May 5, 2011
• Start date: February 2006
• Est. completion date: August 2008

Study information

• Verified date: May 2011
• Source: Novartis
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Efficacy/ safety for the combination of anti-IgE (Omalizumab) and specific immunotherapy (Depigoid) in patients with not adequately controlled seasonal allergic asthma and comorbid seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Description:

This was an open-label extension period of the previously randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to demonstrate the benefit of pre- and co-seasonal combination therapy with anti-IgE (omalizumab) and specific immunotherapy (Depigoid) in patients with seasonal allergic asthma and co-morbid seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. During the open-label period, all patients received Depigoid monotherapy for two follow-up seasons every 4 weeks, 26 injections in total. The extension period was performed to evaluate the influence of omalizumab on the follow-up treatment with Depigoid in seasonal asthma.

This study was a follow-up to the core IGE025ADE03 study, in which patients received omalizumab treatment. In this follow-up study, no patient received omalizumab.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 128
• Est. completion date: August 2008
• Est. primary completion date: August 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 12 Years to 45 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males or females of any race who are 12-45 years of age with a body weight = 20 kg and = 150 kg and with a total serum IgE level = 30 to = 700 IU/ml (suitable weight for dosing)

• Patients with the diagnosis of not adequately controlled seasonal grass pollen (and/or rye pollen) and allergic asthma with concomitant seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis within > 2 previous seasons

• patients with a positive RAST (>CAP2) result for grass pollen (and/or rye pollen) specific IgE at screening (Visit 1 (V1) or within the previous 12 months.

• Patients with FEV1 > 80% of the predicted normal value for the patient at screening [V1](demostrable at least 6 hours after last short acting B-2 agonist use or 12 hours after last long B-2 acting agonist use).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Females of childbearing potential: pregnancy, birth control,breast-feeding

• Concurrent diseases/conditions and history of other diseases/conditions

1. patients who have a positive history of significant clinical manifestations of allergy as a result of sensitization against tree pollen allergens, weed allergens and perennial allergens (e.g. Aspergillus spores, animal dander, house dust mite).

2. patients with a history of food or drug related severe anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction(s).

• Ingredient hypersensitivity

1. patients with known hypersensitivity to any ingredients, including excipients (sucrose, histidine, polysorbate 20) of the study medication, any immunotherapy, or drugs related to Omalizumab (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal gamma globulin).

2. patients with hypersensitivity to the trail's asthma rescue- or escalation-medication or related drugs.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Allergic Asthma
• Asthma
• Conjunctivitis, Allergic

Intervention

Drug:
• Depigoid
Administered in 4-week intervals using 0.5 ml of vial 2 (1000 DPP/mL)
• Omalizumab
anti-IgE (Omalizumab) given during the 2006 core study
• Placebo
Placebo given during the 2006 core study

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Novartis Investigator site	Nuremberg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Novartis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Daily Symptom Load	The daily symptom load (low=0, high=unbounded) represents the daily combined asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis symptom severity scores plus the daily asthma rescue medication score based on patient diary entries. A higher score indicates a worse patient asthma condition. Symptoms (e.g. - difficulty breathing, cough, tightness of chest, sneezing, itchy nose, red eyes, etc.) were evaluated daily by the patient using a 4-point scale (0=no symptom, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Point values were assigned by specific rescue medication usage. The daily scores were averaged over pollen days by site.	Recorded daily during the 2007 and 2008 pollen season	No
Secondary	Asthma/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Severity Score	The symptom severity score was defined as the mean of the daily symptom severity scores (asthma symptoms during the day, asthma symptoms at night, rhinitis symptoms, and conjunctivitis symptoms) during the pollen season. The daily symptom severity scores were evaluated daily by the patient using a 4-point scale (0 = none (no symptom), 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and were recorded in a patient diary. The possible minimum value for the Asthma/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Severity Score is 0, and the possible maximum value is 3. Higher values represent a worse outcome.	Recorded daily during the 2007 and 2008 pollen season	No
Secondary	Asthma/Rhinoconjunctivitis Rescue Medication Score	Asthma/Rhinoconjunctivitis rescue medication score is a component of symptom load. Patients were advised that between visits they could take short acting ß-2 agonist rescue medication as initial rescue medication for symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm. Patients were advised that between visits they could take rescue medication (systemic antihistamines) on an as-needed basis for symptoms of grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The symptom load and all its components were based on the patient's entries in their diaries.	Recorded daily during the 2007 and 2008 pollen season	No
Secondary	Percentage of Participants by Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) Assessment Category Performed by the Investigator	The investigator's assessment of the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) using a five point scale, which evaluates change in asthma control/symptoms. GETE is scored as 1='excellent', 2='good', 3='moderate', 4='poor', 5='worsening' and (.)='missing').	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Percentage of Participants by Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) Assessment Category Performed by the Patient	The patient's assessment of the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) using a five point scale, which evaluates change in asthma control/symptoms. GETE is scored as 1='excellent', 2='good', 3='moderate', 4='poor', 5='worsening' and (.)='missing').	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)	The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was developed and validated for assessing asthma symptom control in patients in clinical trials as well as for individuals in clinical practice. It is a simple questionnaire consisting of seven questions assessing symptoms, airway caliber and rescue ß2-agonist use. It uses a 7-point scale. The possible minimum value is 1, the possible maximum value is 7. Higher values represent worse asthma control and quality of life, respectively.	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)	The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item disease specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma. It consists of 4 domains (symptoms, emotions, exposure to environmental stimuli and activity limitation). Patients are asked to recall their experiences during the previous 2 weeks and to score each item on a 7-point scale. The overall AQLQ score is the mean response to all 32 questions (low=1, high=7). Higher values represent better quality of life.	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)	The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) is a 28-item disease specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with rhinoconjunctivitis. It consists of 7 domains (activities, sleep, common complaints, practical problems, nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, and emotions). Patients recall their experiences during the previous week and to score each item on a 7-point scale. The overall RQLQ score is the mean response to all 28 questions (low=1, high=7). Higher values represent worse quality of life.	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Clinical Differences to Baseline	Both the AQLQ and RQLQ clinical differences were categorized as important, moderate, or meaningful improvement; no clinical change; meaningful, moderate, or important impairment. Clinically important differences in scores between any two assessments have been determined by the authors of the AQLQ and RQLQ. Changes in scores of 0.5 to 1.0 are considered clinically meaningful; 1.0 to 1.5 as moderate and > 1.5 as marked clinically important differences for any individual domain or for the overall summary score.	Baseline of core study and 52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Work Productivity and Activity Impairment	The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire measures time missed from work, impairment of work and regular activities. It consists of 6 items. The outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. The minimum value is 0 (0 %), the maximum value is 1 (100%). The recall time is 1 week. For this study WPAI-AA was used defining the specific health problem as allergic asthma, which has been validated by the instrument owner.	52 Weeks (2007) and 104 Weeks (2008) after completion of core study	No
Secondary	Lung Function as Assessed by Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)	The spirometric parameter Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) was measured during grass pollen season before each injection of Depigoid.	Assist during 2007 and 2008 pollen season	No
Secondary	Lung Function as Assessed by Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)	The spirometric parameter Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was measured during grass pollen season before each injection of Depigoid. PEF was collected in the patient diary at seven days after visit 22, 23 and 24 as well as 35, 36 and 37. For analyzing purposes these data were averaged after the respective visits. Missing PEF-values from the patient diary were not replaced.	Assist during 2007 and 2008 pollen season	No