Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03272776
Other study ID # MASKAPROTECTOR
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2017
Est. completion date July 30, 2018

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The study was designed to evaluate the success rate, time of insertion, sealing efficacy and security of the Protector Laryngeal Mask, a new second generation disposable supraglottic airway device, in patients undergoing elective surgery.


Description:

Laryngeal masks (LM) and supraglottic devices (SGD), in all their different forms, have become an authentic innovation in airway management especially in day surgery.

LMA Protector (Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland) is a new disposable SGD currently available for anaesthetic practice. It is made of silicone (with no latex in its composition) and shares some of the characteristics of the second generation SGDs (as the presence of a gastric access channel); however, it has an additional drainage channel, both channels terminate distally in a camera behind the mask cuff. The presence of two drainage channels ("male" and "female") increases the patient safety against regurgitation, both of distal gastric content and secretions located in the oropharyngeal region. The gastric access channel called "female" also allows the insertion of a nasogastric tube if required. These drainage channels are useful for diagnosing the correct position of the mask, since the observation of leaks or gas through it can help diagnose a displacement the mask.

LMA Protector is designed with a preformed anatomic curve, and the airway conduct has an elliptical cross section, which ends distally in the mask. This design follows the anatomy of the human airway, which facilitates the insertion of the device. The softness of the mask material allows easy insertion.

Doubts regarding the transmission of infectious diseases with reusable devices makes disposable devices such as LMA Protector, one of the most interesting devices for use in anaesthetic procedures that are usually performed with SGD.

Its characteristics in the design, composition by a smooth and atraumatic material, the presence of two gastric drainage accesses, with potential improved patient safety and its characteristic of being disposable suggests a significant expansion of its use in the coming years .

In contrast to other SGDs that have been evaluated extensively, to date there are no large clinical studies showing its suitably and performance in a daily clinical scenario.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 280
Est. completion date July 30, 2018
Est. primary completion date July 30, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Surgery procedures usually performed with supraglottic devices.

- ASA physical status I-III patients

- Age 18-75

- Signed inform consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with known difficult airway

- Patients with predicted difficult airway

- Patients with increased risk of aspiration

- Patient refusal to participate in the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Protector Laryngeal Mask airway
Evaluate the time of insertion, performance, security and insertion success rate of the Protector Laryngeal Mask in patients under general anasthesia.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon Madrid

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Matilde Zaballos Teleflex

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (4)

Brimacombe JR, editor. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and practice. 2nd Ed. Filadelfia. 2005.

Van Zundert AA, Skinner MW, Van Zundert TC, Luney SR, Pandit JJ. Value of knowing physical characteristics of the airway device before using it. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):12-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew106. Epub 2016 May 4. — View Citation

Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, Cordero Lorenzo JM, Izquierdo Villaroya B, Lafuente Ojeda N, M. López Gil M, Rodríguez Archilla A, Zaballos Bustingorri J Recomendaciones prácticas de uso de la mascarilla laríngea en Cirugía Ambulatoria. Cir May Amb 2008; 13: (1) 4-26.

Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, et al. Nuevas aportaciones de la mascarilla laríngea en cirugía ambulatoria. Contribución de la mascarilla laríngea Supreme. Cir May Amb 2011; 16(2): 60-6.

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Evaluate the number of attempts to insert of the LMA Protector Insertion attempts: from picking up the LMA Protector until the mask is placed into the patient mouth . (in numbers) The number of insertion attempts will be collected after anesthesia induction: 1 minute after the administration of propofol
Secondary Blood pressure during insertion of LMA protect Blood pressure in mmHg Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector
Secondary Heart rate during insertion of LMA protect heart rate in beep per minute Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector
Secondary BIS data number from 100 (awake) to 40-45 (anesthetic status) Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector (To evaluate the evolution of BIS values during insertion of the LMA
Secondary Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be determined with an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O by closing the expiratory valve of the breathing circle circuit at a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min and noting the pressure at which an oropharyngeal leak occurs. (in cm H2O) The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be collected 5 minutes after the LMA Protector will be inserted
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06174896 - LMA Placement Techniques and Airway in Children and Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure N/A
Completed NCT04124770 - Neck Position and Ultrasound Landmark of Cricothyroid Membrane
Recruiting NCT04385576 - Taiwan "Aerosol Box" Versus UMMC "Intubation Box" N/A
Completed NCT00884754 - Comparison of GlideScope-Specific Rigid Stylet to Standard Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation by Novice Operators N/A
Completed NCT05478122 - Soft Mist Spray Device for Airway Anaesthesia During Awake Videolaryngoscopy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06197880 - Airway Morphology After En-masse Retraction in Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients N/A
Completed NCT04533334 - Measurement of the Distances of the Lower Airway in Pediatric Population
Terminated NCT01031940 - CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation. N/A
Terminated NCT02955511 - Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04501068 - Evaluation of the Ambu® AuraGain in Ambulatory Surgery
Recruiting NCT02210338 - A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope N/A
Completed NCT06356298 - Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Tube for Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06245668 - SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask Versus LMA Supreme N/A