Airway Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicenter Study of the Protector Laryngeal Mask in Non Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients
NCT number | NCT03272776 |
Other study ID # | MASKAPROTECTOR |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 1, 2017 |
Est. completion date | July 30, 2018 |
Verified date | February 2019 |
Source | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The study was designed to evaluate the success rate, time of insertion, sealing efficacy and security of the Protector Laryngeal Mask, a new second generation disposable supraglottic airway device, in patients undergoing elective surgery.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 280 |
Est. completion date | July 30, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 30, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Surgery procedures usually performed with supraglottic devices. - ASA physical status I-III patients - Age 18-75 - Signed inform consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with known difficult airway - Patients with predicted difficult airway - Patients with increased risk of aspiration - Patient refusal to participate in the study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Madrid |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Matilde Zaballos | Teleflex |
Spain,
Brimacombe JR, editor. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and practice. 2nd Ed. Filadelfia. 2005.
Van Zundert AA, Skinner MW, Van Zundert TC, Luney SR, Pandit JJ. Value of knowing physical characteristics of the airway device before using it. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):12-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew106. Epub 2016 May 4. — View Citation
Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, Cordero Lorenzo JM, Izquierdo Villaroya B, Lafuente Ojeda N, M. López Gil M, Rodríguez Archilla A, Zaballos Bustingorri J Recomendaciones prácticas de uso de la mascarilla laríngea en Cirugía Ambulatoria. Cir May Amb 2008; 13: (1) 4-26.
Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, et al. Nuevas aportaciones de la mascarilla laríngea en cirugía ambulatoria. Contribución de la mascarilla laríngea Supreme. Cir May Amb 2011; 16(2): 60-6.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Evaluate the number of attempts to insert of the LMA Protector | Insertion attempts: from picking up the LMA Protector until the mask is placed into the patient mouth . (in numbers) | The number of insertion attempts will be collected after anesthesia induction: 1 minute after the administration of propofol | |
Secondary | Blood pressure during insertion of LMA protect | Blood pressure in mmHg | Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector | |
Secondary | Heart rate during insertion of LMA protect | heart rate in beep per minute | Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector | |
Secondary | BIS data | number from 100 (awake) to 40-45 (anesthetic status) | Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector (To evaluate the evolution of BIS values during insertion of the LMA | |
Secondary | Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector | The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be determined with an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O by closing the expiratory valve of the breathing circle circuit at a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min and noting the pressure at which an oropharyngeal leak occurs. (in cm H2O) | The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be collected 5 minutes after the LMA Protector will be inserted |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06174896 -
LMA Placement Techniques and Airway in Children and Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04124770 -
Neck Position and Ultrasound Landmark of Cricothyroid Membrane
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04385576 -
Taiwan "Aerosol Box" Versus UMMC "Intubation Box"
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00884754 -
Comparison of GlideScope-Specific Rigid Stylet to Standard Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation by Novice Operators
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05478122 -
Soft Mist Spray Device for Airway Anaesthesia During Awake Videolaryngoscopy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06197880 -
Airway Morphology After En-masse Retraction in Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04533334 -
Measurement of the Distances of the Lower Airway in Pediatric Population
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01031940 -
CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02955511 -
Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04501068 -
Evaluation of the Ambu® AuraGain in Ambulatory Surgery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02210338 -
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06356298 -
Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Tube for Childhood Adenotonsillectomy
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06245668 -
SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask Versus LMA Supreme
|
N/A |