View clinical trials related to Airway Extubation.
Filter by:Determining the appropriate extubation timing for mechanically ventilated patients is a critical issue in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Early or delayed extubation may prolong mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, leading to an increased mortality rate. Currently, extubation timing relies solely on the Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT), but its reliability is relatively low, with a extubation failure rate ranging from 10% to 40%. Therefore, accurately predicting potential post-extubation issues and early identification of reasons for SBT trial failure are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Commonly used parameters for assessing readiness for extubation do not fully reflect organ dysfunction, and the investigators plan to utilize comprehensive techniques, including bedside lung and diaphragm ultrasound parameters, to enhance the accuracy of predicting extubation outcomes in patients who pass the SBT trial.
A significant proportion of patients who are intubated for trauma-related injuries, will fail the extubation process. This means that, when the decision has been made to remove the endotracheal tube, a certain proportion of these patients will require the endotracheal tube to be re-inserted. Global estimates for the rates of re-intubation range from 5-15% of all patients who have had attempted extubation on Intensive Care Units. The exact figures for intubated victims of trauma are not available. Re-intubation is associated with increased intensive care and hospital length of stay, increased morbidity, and the physical risks to the patient inherent with the intubation process. There is also some evidence that the rates of tracheostomy are higher in patients who have failed extubation. A number of interventions have been developed to help prevent extubation failure. Non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen are routinely employed in practice. However, there have been no specific studies of these interventions in TICU patients. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) has emerged over the last decade as a viable adjunct in the management of patients suffering from, or at risk of, hypoxemic respiratory failure. Within the intensive care unit settings, HFNO has been studies in terms of preventing intubation, but it has been evaluated more often in terms of preventing extubation failure. Our study aims to answer the question of whether HFNO is effective at preventing extubation failure in intubated and ventilated victims of traumatic injuries. Previous studies on the same subject, are not based on unequivocal, robust RCTs with low risk of bias. Our primary outcome measure is re-intubation rates and secondary outcome measures are CO2 accumulation rates, atelectasis rates, nutrition status within first 24 hours post extubation, and post - extubation rates of vomiting. Ours will be a prospective, randomized clinical control study. There will be three arms to the study: a control arm, and two intervention arms. Randomization will be done on a permuted block basis. The control arm will be patients receiving standard oxygen therapy, and the intervention arms will be either High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy or Non-invasive Ventilation via mask. We propose that, when compared with either face-mask O2, NIV (CPAP), HFNO administered continuously for 24 hours post extubation of trauma patients on ICU, will result in better patient-related outcomes.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility to perform a future larger clinical trial to analyze whether the mechanical ventilation reconnection for 1 hour after a successful spontaneous breathing trial reduces the risk of reintubation or death at 7 days in participants with more than 72 hours of mechanical ventilation. The study will compare two weaning strategies in critically ill participants admitted to intensive care units, with more than 72 hours of mechanical ventilation and with a successful spontaneous breathing trial: 1. Reconnection to mechanical ventilation for 1 hour followed by extubation; 2. Direct extubation. Follow-up will be until hospital discharge or death.
Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is the mainstay of supportive care in acute respiratory failure. However, maintaining ventilatory support beyond what is necessary may increase the risk of nosocomial infections, favour respiratory muscle atrophy, prolong ICU stay and increase hospital costs. Similarly, premature withdrawal of ventilatory support may increase ICU patient mortality by requiring reintubation. The MV weaning process is nothing more than the set of procedures that lead to the restoration of normal ventilation of the patient, freeing him/her from ventilatory support and eventually also from an artificial airway. This is a gradual process that can take a significant amount of hospitalisation time, so much so that it could even correspond to 40% of the entire period of ventilatory support. Currently, the process of disconnection from IMV is based on the performance of a spontaneous ventilation test (SVT) either with an unsupported oxygen source or with low ventilator support , with a duration of 30 to 120 minutes. One of the causes that may condition the viability of SVT is respiratory muscle weakness, which may be ventilator-induced. This condition is a syndrome characterised by the appearance of diffuse and symmetrical muscle weakness affecting 26-65% of patients mechanically ventilated for more than 5 days. Muscle wasting has been demonstrated by ultrasonography with an 18% reduction in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle on the 10th day of evolution. This syndrome is associated with an increase in mechanical ventilation time and a 2 to 5-fold increase in mortality. Based on the above, the assessment of respiratory muscle strength should form part of the disconnection protocols of our units. The most studied parameters that provide us with information on patient readiness to face this process are f/Vt, PIM and P(O.1). Recently, the study of the diaphragm by ultrasonography is becoming a valid alternative technique for the study of the state of the muscle most involved in spontaneous breathing.
Observational study in two medical-surgical intensive care units of the Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital to develop a composite score for prediction of 72h-extubation failure in patients at risk of extubation failure.
Expeditious, safe extubation is vitally important in the care of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, as prolonged mechanical ventilation harms patients and failed extubation (i.e. re-intubation within 48 hrs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. The urgent need to improve extubation failure is further highlighted by current observations suggesting that COVID-19 patients are at increased risk of both early and late extubation failure. The investigators previously found that decreased respiratory rate variability (indicative of reduced adaptability and/or increased stress) during Spontaneous Breathing Trials (SBTs) predicted extubation failure and outperformed the best available predictive indices. Combining this predictive analytic with standardized extubation readiness checklists and risk mitigation strategies, the investigators created the Extubation Advisor (EA). The investigators recently completed a single-center phase I mixed methods observational study (n=117) wherein there was demonstrated technical feasibility (i.e. ability to generate 92% EA of reports) and clinician acceptance of the EA tool. In the current open-label, multi-center interventional phase I study, the investigators will assess the feasibility and initial perceptions of EA implementation in the intensive care unit by (1) evaluating the feasibility of patient enrolment, data collection, and EA report generation, and (2) performing a mixed-methods analysis of critical care physician and respiratory therapist perceptions of EA. Findings from this study will inform a future randomized controlled trial assessing EA outcomes compared to standard of care, with the intent of aiding bedside decision-making, enhancing care delivery, and improving outcomes in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19.
This study evaluates the relation between the volume of subglottic secretion before airway extubation and the risk of extubation failure in the ICU patient.