Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Enrolling by invitation
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04738422 |
Other study ID # |
2003838272 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Enrolling by invitation |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 11, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
November 30, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
Indiana University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways,
including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to
bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic
inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute
pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically
obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive
nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the
health and disease. In this study, we will evaluate non-invasive clinical methods that can be
done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories for measuring
airway pH.
Description:
Airway pH imbalances cause numerous adverse physiological changes within the airways,
including hyperreactivity, cough, bronchoconstriction, ciliopathy, decreased response to
bronchodilators, bacterial growth, nitrosative/oxidative stress, neutrophilic/eosinophilic
inflammation, and cell death. Airway pH is known to be low (acidic) in chronic and acute
pulmonary diseases. The gold standard approach to measuring airway pH is to bronchscopically
obtain epithelial cell lining fluid using protected brush sampling. The expense and invasive
nature of this approach is a barrier to fully characterizing the role of airway pH in the
health and disease. In this study, the investigator will evaluate non-invasive clinical
methods that can be done using equipment standard in clinical pulmonary function laboratories
for measuring airway pH.
The study team has previously demonstrated that exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH and
changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide collected at 50mL/sec (FeNO50) after inhalation of
an alkaline glycine buffer (AGB) indicate low airway pH. While EBC pH is the most common
method and validated method for estimating airway pH, the investigators believes that the
change in FeNO50 is the most sensitive test for general airway pH. Specifically, this
proposed test makes use of the facts that the pH of nitrite/nitrous acid (NO2-/HNO2) is just
under 4. Nitrous acid thus evolves nitric oxide (NO) when pH is less than 6.5, and NO
evolution stops when pH is above 7. Because endogenous human airway NO2- levels are normally
low μM, (32) NO2 protonation can be used as a noninvasive test for airway pH. Using the
Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the investigator can use these changes in NO to calculate pH.
The investigator has now done studies with both inhaled phosphate buffer and AGB, both of
which show that specific patients with asthma have a significant fall in FeNO50 following
buffer inhalation. While FeNO50 is validated to represent the nitric oxide levels of the
middle airways, sampling can be done at several different flowrates and times to evaluate the
nitric oxide levels in different compartments of the lung. This can allow for regional airway
pH measurement which would be helpful since many airway diseases are heterogeneous and
regional. The investigator will further characterize the normal range of airway pH in health
and disease compartmentally within the airways and in subsequent studies will evaluate the
effects of clinically altering pH when it is abnormal.
It has been recently discovered that airway pH is integral to airway cell entry and
replication of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specifically, one of the pathways by which the virus enters
cells and replicates is blocked by intracellular alkalinization. The investigator therefore
tested to determine whether AGB would cause intracellular alkalinization in cultured primary
human airway epithelial cells. It did; and the drug was well-tolerated by the cells in vitro
(as it is in vivo).
The investigators believes that the next step is to determine whether AGB inhibits viral
replication and viral entry in our primary human airway epithelial cultures. To do this, the
investigator is partnering with the Indiana University BSL3 virology lab. The investigator
has acquired the virus, completed preparations of it, and has infected human airway
epithelial cultures with it. The study team is awaiting preliminary results of the effects of
AGB on viral entry and replication. If in fact AGB inhibits viral cell entry and, thereby,
replication, the investigator intends to expand the IND with the FDA, allowing a trial in
patients at risk for respiratory distress associated with known COVID-2 respiratory disease.
Ultimately, outcomes of this trial would be proposed to include: mortality (primary); as well
as ICU length of stay and oxygen saturation index area under the curve (secondary). The
investigator has submitted grants to the NIH, the DoD, and several other agencies for this
project.
The study proposed here will not only provide further insight into the use of AGB in a larger
population but also will allow for evaluation of airway pH in those receiving it which could
be used to guide therapy.