Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to evaluate the Efficiency and safety of BASKA mask ventilation in comparison with endotracheal intubation during otologic surgery performed with the head and neck in the lateral position. The primary outcome will be the intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Secondary outcomes will be intraoperative lung mechanics, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), ventilation score, fiberoptic glottic view score, and perioperative adverse effects.


Clinical Trial Description

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was invented in 1981 by Dr Brain Because of its advantages, LMAs are increasingly used as a substitute for endotracheal tubes in a variety of surgical situations requiring general anesthesia. With the appearance of various new LMAs that address the limitations of the classic model, not only has their use in selective operations increased, but the indications for LMA have also grown LMAs can be inserted into the hypopharynx easily without laryngoscopy and neuromuscular blocking agents, and they can also be removed from the patient's mouth quickly. Decreasing airway irritation during surgery results in fewer hemodynamic changes and airway accidents from anesthesia and enables wakeup with less coughing and bucking, which could result in less ossicular replacement prosthesis displacement . In middle ear/mastoid procedures, because the operation involves the temporal bone, including the surrounding normal nerves and blood vessels, improper manipulation can lead to complications such as facial paralysis; therefore, the operation needs to be performed carefully. Compared to endotracheal intubation, LMAs have little effect on middle ear pressure . These advantages make anesthesiologists prefer LMAs during otologic surgery. In addition, since LMAs can reduce the response to upper airway stimulation, they can be used as an airway device during surgery requiring facial nerve monitoring without the use of muscle relaxants . However, the points of contention and primary disadvantages of the use of LMA are the reduced levels of airway protection, the increased risk of gastric insufflation, the difficulty of insertion, partial upper airway obstruction and the possibility of dislocation during the procedure . To expose the operative field, otologists usually require the patient's head be rotated 60°~90° to the healthy side. Some studies have reported that the head and neck position can affect the sealing and ventilation functions of LMAs and the fiberoptic view . The Baska mask (Logikal Health Products PTY Ltd., Morisset, NSW, Australia) is a supraglottic airway device introduced in 2012 with many innovations that might be expected to overcome these derangements . First, its' non-inflatable cuff is continuous with the central channel of the device and automatically inflates during positive pressure ventilation in response to the increased inflation pressure. This inflation produces an oropharyngeal leak pressure higher than that produced by other LMAs, enabling more effective ventilation. Second, it has an esophageal drainage inlet and side channels that comprise an efficient pharyngeal drainage system which facilitates aspiration of gastric contents, thereby reducing the risk of gastric overinflation and pulmonary aspiration. Third, a strong integrated bite-block that acts as a safeguard against obstruction of the Baska mask. In this study, the hypothesis is that these modifications might enable the Baska mask to become a reasonable and safe alternative to the endotracheal intubation in during otologic surgery performed with the head and neck in the lateral position. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05748782
Study type Observational
Source Assiut University
Contact Ahmed G Esmael, MBBCH
Phone 01143187593
Email drahmedgamal127@gmail.com
Status Recruiting
Phase
Start date July 23, 2023
Completion date March 1, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT03567928 - Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures N/A
Terminated NCT01031940 - CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation. N/A