Air Leakage Clinical Trial
— THOPAZOfficial title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Chest Tube Drainage System (Thopaz+) Versus Analog in Pediatric Patients
NCT number | NCT05511987 |
Other study ID # | 14196 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 15, 2023 |
Est. completion date | April 1, 2025 |
In 2007 the Thopaz digital drainage system was launched as one of the first chest tube drainage systems to utilize a digital rather than analog device. The digital system allows for stored data, objective measurement of air leaks as well as maintaining a constant pleural pressure. The adult literature describes multiple benefits of using a digital drainage system, only two studies to date have looked at pediatric patients. In the adult literature, reported benefits include shorter chest tube drainage times, decreased length of stay, cost savings and fewer chest x-rays. To date, there have been no prospective randomized controlled trials comparing digital versus analog chest tube drainage systems in pediatric patients. In addition, the only two pediatric studies which looked at the potential benefits of a digital drainage system only looked at its use in patients who underwent pulmonary resection. Thus, a gap in the literature exists for a prospective trial determining if there is benefit to using a digital vs analog drainage system in pediatric patients requiring a chest tube. The investigators hypothesize that pediatric patients who are placed on the Thopaz+ digital drainage system will have decreased duration of chest tube drainage, fewer chest x-rays and shorter duration of air leaks compared to patients using a traditional analog chest tube drainage system. This will be the first prospective randomized study exploring the potential benefits of using a digital chest tube drainage system in pediatric patients.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 140 |
Est. completion date | April 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | September 1, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 0 Minutes to 17 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - age=17 years old - requiring chest tube placement for spontaneous pneumothorax or pulmonary resection by a surgeon (or surgical trainee) at The Children's Hospital Exclusion Criteria: - age=18-year-old - chest tube placement by neonatologist or pediatrician, - malignant pleural effusion - re-operation or emergent operation - pre-operative chemotherapy or radiation or history of chemotherapy or radiation within the past 12 months - renal or hepatic failure - neurological dysfunction - empyema |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Oklahoma | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Oklahoma |
United States,
Brunelli A, Salati M, Pompili C, Refai M, Sabbatini A. Regulated tailored suction vs regulated seal: a prospective randomized trial on air leak duration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):899-904. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs518. Epub 2012 Sep 28. — View Citation
Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A. Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin. 2010 Aug;20(3):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.03.007. — View Citation
Costa AD Jr, Bachichi T, Holanda C, Rizzo LA. An initial experience with a digital drainage system during the postoperative period of pediatric thoracic surgery. J Bras Pneumol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):444-446. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000269. — View Citation
Gilbert S, McGuire AL, Maghera S, Sundaresan SR, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Villeneuve PJ. Randomized trial of digital versus analog pleural drainage in patients with or without a pulmonary air leak after lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.051. Epub 2015 Aug 28. — View Citation
Jablonski S, Brocki M, Wawrzycki M, Smigielski JA, Kozakiewicz M. Efficacy assessment of the drainage with permanent airflow measurement in the treatment of pneumothorax with air leak. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;62(6):509-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359714. Epub 2013 Dec 2. — View Citation
Lee SA, Kim JS, Chee HK, Hwang JJ, Ji M, Kim YH, Moon HJ, Lee WS. Clinical application of a digital thoracic drainage system for objectifying and quantifying air leak versus the traditional vacuum system: a retrospective observational study. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):1020-1035. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2993. — View Citation
Munnell ER. Thoracic drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 May;63(5):1497-502. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00082-9. — View Citation
Perez-Egido L, Garcia-Casillas MA, Simal I, Fanjul M, Canizo A, Cerda JA, Fernandez B, de la Torre M, Ordonez J, de Agustin JC. Digital thoracic drainage: a new system to monitor air leaks in pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Apr;54(4):693-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.068. Epub 2018 Dec 19. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The THOPAZ digital device vs the Atrium Dry Suction Control Water Seal analog chest tube drainage systems. | The THOPAZ digital device vs the Atrium Dry Suction Control Water Seal analog chest tube drainage systems will be compaired. The systems will be measured in cmH2O. | 2 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03392662 -
Hemopatch Performance Evaluation: A Prospective Observational Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT03723408 -
Factors Increasing Air Burden in Intravenous Tubing
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04294108 -
Why in Hospital After VATS Lobectomy
|