Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Doing More With Less": Optimizing Psychotherapeutic Services in the Mental Health System
Psychotherapy is one of the cornerstones of mental health services. It is provided by
psychiatrist, psychologists and psychiatric social worker in both hospital and out-patient
services, and is assumed to require massive manpower and training inputs.
Internationally, the clinical outcomes of routine mental health services are rarely recorded
or reported. However, a rough estimation is that half (40-60%) of all psychotherapies have a
favorable clinical outcome. Recently (Clark et al, 2017), the English Improving Access to
Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Program, which delivers psychotherapies to more than 537 000
patients in the UK each year, indicated that 44% of the patients recovered, and 62%-
improved. Consistent with a causal model, most organizational factors also predicted
between-year changes in outcome, together accounting for 33% of variance in reliable
improvement and 22% for reliable recovery.
The proposed study aims at dramatically improving the yield of psychotherapies in the Mental
Health Services by combining monitoring and patient-therapist matching strategies. The first
will be achieved by implementing Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM), and the second- by
applying a patient-therapist match-re-match procedure during psychotherapy
Routine Outcome Monitoring Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) enables systematic assessment of
treatment outcomes at regular intervals for monitoring the progress of patients during
treatment. ROM was originally developed for clinical studies, thus providing quality feedback
for research and clinical purposes. There is accumulated evidence that ROM has positive
effects for supporting care, for research and for management.
As of the beginning of the previous decade, ROM projects have developed and integrated into
national health systems (e.g. Australia and New Zealand, England, etc.) and in various
research groups around the world (e.g. Holland, Italy, USA, Canada, (Ruggeri, 2002; Burgess
et al., 2012; Mellor-Clarket al., 2006) .In recent years, computer software has been widely
used to collect, analyze and manage information in a secure, efficient and accessible manner,
providing ongoing feedback to caregivers (Barkham et al., 2001; Barkham & Mellor-Clark, 2003;
Margison et al., 2000).
Routine outcome monitoring can enable achieving several goals that directly contribute to
treatment (De Beurs et al., 2011). It provides quality feedback to clinicians and patients in
real time about the progress of the treatment and the early identification of various
problems such as negative response to therapy. This increases the positive response to the
treatment, balances the therapist's biases in an optimistic or pessimistic direction,
supports decisions in treatment and improves the cooperation between the therapist and the
patient. Hence, patients' involvement in the therapeutic process, their commitment to it, and
their satisfaction (Whipple & Lambert, 2011), Lambert, 2010 (Priebe et al., 2002) also
improve. A group of studies has shown that frequent monitoring of the evaluation of the
therapeutic relationship during psychotherapy enables better real-time identification of
therapeutic ruptures that can be corrected (Muran et al. 2009; Safran et al., 2011). In
psychiatric work with more severe patients, it was demonstrated that there was a correlation
between ROM and a significant reduction in the number and duration of hospitalizations, a
finding that has a significant economic significance (Slade et al., 2006). In a meta-analysis
review published in 2009 (12 studies, 2001-2006) a significant short-term symptomatic
improvement and some long-term improvements was shown in monitored therapies. In another
review (Shimokawa et al., 2010), a weekly measure of personal well-being measures had a
significant positive impact on the quality, duration and outcome of treatment, especially in
patients prone to dropout. Despite initial objections among teams to introduce quantitative
measurements into their work, various attempts have shown that after assimilation, staff
satisfaction from the systems is great and serves as a complement to individual work and
staff meetings (de Beurs et al., 2011).
The collection of the broad information in the ROM is also used for managerial purposes
(Trauer, 2010). For example, the accumulated information can be used for ongoing
epidemiological research of treatments as they actually occur in a heterogeneous clinical
environment and may maximize resources utilization (Coombs et al., 2011). The information
produced (on the organizational, local, regional or national levels) is more likely to have
higher predictive validity than information extracted from incidental questioning patients
for improvement. Effective evaluations of various treatment approaches have also been made,
and it is important to consider that treatments are indeed effective in the particular
clinical setting they are provided, and not only in controlled studies under very different
conditions (Stiles et al., 2008). Applying ROM appears to be more effective when integrated
in a formalized and structured manner (Krägeloh, 2015). In such terms, it may be a powerful
managerial tool, balancing between the patient's expectations and needs and the mental health
care capacity. It is thus surprising, as recently noted by Jensen-Doss (2018), that ROM
rarely used in practice, even though it is viewed favorably.
Despite current enthusiasm, advances in implementation, and the growing belief among some
proponents and policymakers that ROM represents a major revolution in the practice of
psychotherapy, other research has suggested that the focus on measurement and monitoring is
in danger of missing the point (Miller et al., 2015). Research from the field of expertise
and expert performance provides guidance for realizing the full potential of ROM. One crucial
element in optimizing the effect of the ROM is that the decisions derived from continuously
collecting the outcome measures will be taken with the patient (and not just shared with
him/her). As shown by Clarke et al. (2015), more active involvement in decision-making than
the patient stated as desired was associated with higher satisfaction. A clinical orientation
towards empowering, rather than shared, decision-making may maximize satisfaction and
optimize the effect ROM may have on clinical practice.
Implementation of novel strategies in the field of psychiatry may result in substantial cost
reduction (van Londen, 2016) Patient-therapist matching in psychotherapy Research on fitting
treatment procedures to the unique needs and proclivities of patients is limited. Traditional
research on efficacy of psychotherapy focuses on the role of interventions and theoretical
brands, minimizing factors that cannot be randomly assigned. This line of research has not
realized its initial and desired promise, perhaps because it fails to incorporate into the
study of psychotherapy important and effective treatment variations that are associated with
therapist and non-diagnostic patient factors (Beutler, 2015).
The possibility to match patient to therapist by pre-treatment data did not succeed. Many
factors were found to contribute to good outcome in psychotherapies. These include patient's
factors (e.g.- high levels of motivation and involvement with positive, but realistic
attitude), therapist's factors (e.g.- training and supervision) and relational factors
(strength of therapeutic alliance is a leading factor; other factors are of moderate- to
poor-correlation to outcome) (Cooper, 2008).
While it is accepted that pre-treatment patient-therapist match will not do, the possibility
to re-match patient-therapist dyads in case of unsuccessful therapies clinically sounds.
Surprisingly, to our best knowledge, this possibility was never examined. Thus, while the ROM
clearly indicates whether the trajectory of a given psychotherapy is favorable, it is not
examined for initiating patient-therapist re-matching in therapies with poor outcome. This
can be attributed to the personal and protected nature of the psychotherapy, generally
perceived as indifferent to external observation.
RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS Co-implementation of patient- and therapist-based routine monitoring
tools with matching/re-matching strategies will promote therapy outcome in 25% and will not
reduce total patients' satisfaction.
As measured in cost-effectiveness values, our secondary assumption is that co-implementation
of monitoring-&-managing systems will reduce 28% of mental health costs in the unit examined.
STUDY DESIGN The study (see Figure 1 attached at the end of the proposal) will span over 21
months, of which 14 months will be dedicated for assessing the effect of
monitoring-&-matching system in one out-patient intensive mental health facility.
The study will be performed in the Day Care Department (DCD) of the Shalvata Mental Health
Center (SMHC). This unit treats patients who suffer from psychiatric disorders but do not
require full hospitalization. The DCD is part of the SMHC out-patient network, and admits
patients directly from the community (half-way in). The department has a diverse team (30
professionals) of psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists,
expressive therapists and nursing staff, and receives about 10-15 patients each month. The
DCD is ideal for testing new therapeutic strategies in the field of psychiatry: it supplies
intensive care (thus enabling frequent monitoring of the patient's condition), it operates in
large volumes (i.e., can quickly examine proposals for implementing treatment systems), it is
backed by sophisticated information systems (Chameleon; an integrated electronic medical
record system) and as it is situated "in-between" the hospitalizing and ambulatory systems
(it covers both of them).
The proposed study in a pilot study, thus focusing on a relatively small number of
participants. Altogether, one hundred patients will be enrolled in the study,
randomized-by-order to either the monitored-&-matched ("re-matched") group, or the
treated-as-usual (TAU) group. Enrolled patients of the two groups will be followed for their
entire day-care period, or to a period of 3 months (the shorter of the two). Follow up will
include in both re-matched and TAU groups formalized (SCID) and an array of self-reported
questionnaires (see below). Patients and therapists of the both group will routinely complete
ROM questionnaires, as well as mid- and end-term questionnaires evaluating their condition
and satisfaction; only patients of the re-matched group will be matched/re-matched (see
below).
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06038721 -
Unified Protocol: Community Connections
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03224845 -
Courageous Parents, Courageous Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02096783 -
Scripted Sexual Health Informational Intervention in Improving Sexual Function in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02145429 -
Preventing Depression in Late Life: A Model for Low and Middle Income Countries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00794456 -
Association of Passiflora Incarnata L; Crataegus Oxyacantha L and Salix Alba L. on Mild and Moderate Anxiety
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00896467 -
Psychological and Emotional Impact in Patients Undergoing Treatment For Metastatic Cancer Either in a Clinical Trial or as Standard Off-Trial Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00252343 -
Efficacy and Safety of SR58611A in Patients With a Generalized Anxiety Disorder
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05867823 -
OcupApp: Occupational Self-analysis Intervention Through an Mobile Application
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04562324 -
Efficacy of Electroencephalography (EEG) Neurofeedback (NF) for the Treatment of Anxiety Disorder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05989451 -
Adaptation of Individual Dialectical Behavior Therapy Intervention for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05488418 -
Clinical Study of Biomarkers of Stress Resilience: Role of ELK1 and GPR56
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03400397 -
An Effectiveness Study of the Cool Kids Programme
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00025844 -
Fear Conditioning Using Computer-Generated Virtual Reality
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02579928 -
Ketamine Infusion for Adolescent Depression and Anxiety
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02270073 -
The Process Outcome Mindfulness Effects in Trainees (PrOMET)-Study
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03764644 -
Web-based Attention Bias Modification Treatment for Childhood Anxiety Disorders
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01425619 -
The Effect of Medical Clowns and Topical Anesthetic Cream on Pain and Anxiety in Children Undergoing Allergy Skin Tests
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01721824 -
The Effect of IPS-MA- A Modified Early Supported Employment Intervention for Individuals With Mood or Anxiety Disorders
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01227980 -
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 1 (CRH1) Antagonism in Anxious Alcoholics^
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01730625 -
Augmenting Effects of ABMT on CBT in Anxious Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
N/A |