Evaluation of Bibliotherapy by Students and Patients With Cancer

Advanced Solid Tumor Clinical Trial

Official title:

Bibliotherapy, Students in Medicine and Health Sciences Read to Patients With Cancer During Treatment, an Evaluation by Patients and Students.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03969082
• Other study ID #: BC-4703
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 9, 2019
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: University Hospital, Ghent
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Research has demonstrated the positive effects of bibliotherapy (the use of reading in the treatment of patients), such as increased self-awareness, increased empathy, hope and decreased negativity. At Ghent University Hospital, 20 students from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences were selected to be trained as readers by 'The Readers Collective', a Flemish Organization inspired by The Reader. Those students will read to patients with acute leukemia or to patients with a solid tumors in an advanced stage, using the "read aloud" method. Eight to ten reading sessions of approximately half an hour will be organized in a 1: 1 relationship between student and patient during a period of six months. The primary aim of study is to determine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention by the patients as well as the students. Secondary aims are exploring the impact of the reading sessions on the professional development of the students and on the emotional well-being and quality of life of cancer patients. Assessment will be based upon questionnaires (as a basis for the in-depth interviews), diary notes, and in-depth interviews.

Description:

Bibliotherapy has been defined in different ways, but fundamentally means helping people through the use of books. In clinical contexts, it often refers to psychological self-help interventions that use treatment books [1]. However, other reading therapies exist, such as reading to patients during their treatment. Studies have demonstrated the positive effects of the use of reading in the treatment of patients such as increased self-awareness, empathy and hope and less negativity. The Reader, a British national charity, is the pioneer of a specific literature-based intervention i.e. shared reading. This approach is different from many reading therapies because it emphasizes on (1) reading aloud so that the book is a live presence and not an object of study (as is the case in educational settings) or a subject of chat (as in a book club) and on (2) literature (poetry and fiction) and its role in offering a model of human thinking and feeling. In the model of The Reader, small groups (2-12 people) come together weekly, to read novels, short stories and poetry together aloud. The target groups of The Reader are very diverse such as ordinary library visitors, vulnerable youth, rehabilitation groups in psychiatric hospitals, groups in prisons, prevention groups for stress and burnout, growth groups, personal etc. This project, however, is unique in different ways. First, reading sessions will be organized in the hospital setting in a 1:1 relationship, as opposed to in small groups. Second, we will asses the possible impact of the intervention on emotional wellbeing and quality of life of patients with cancer, as well as on the student's professional development. This will be done by means of questionnaires (not as a quantitative study, but as a basis for the in-depth interview), diary notes, and an in-depth interview (student and patient separately and once together) . The primary aim of this project is to assess the acceptability of this intervention. Specifically, this study seeks feedback on how well the reading sessions are received by the patients and the students. Secondly, we will assess if the sessions meet the needs of patients in their coping with cancer and help students in their professional development. To assess acceptability, in-depth interviews will be used and participants will be asked about their opinions regarding the reading sessions. We chose this particular interview type because it grants the interviewer flexibility to follow up with relevant questions and probes to gather richer information. The interviews will be recorded for transcription and analysis. A call for participation for this study was made to students in Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University at a lecture of Jane Davis, the founder of The Reader. Students could submit their application; in total more than 50 applications were received. Three physicians (Dr. Helewaut, Dr. Pype and Dr. Kerre) independently scored the applications on the basis of motivation, background and age.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: March 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Patients

Inclusion Criteria:

• Clinical diagnosis of acute leukemia or advanced cancer of a solid tumor
• Treated at an inpatient ward (for patients with leukemia)
• Treated at inpatient ward ( for patients with solid tumor)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients under 18 years;
• Patients who are not able to read or understand Dutch.

Students:

• Student of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Leukemia
• Advanced Solid Tumor

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Bibliotherapy
Students will read to patients during 30 minutes. They will read aloud and pause regularly to encourage patients to reflect on what is being read, on the thoughts the poem or book has stirred or on how the reading matter relates to their own lives.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent	Gent	Oost-Vlaanderen

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Hospital, Ghent	Het Lezerscollectief, University Ghent

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (4)

Billington J, Farrington G, Lampropoulou S, Lingwood J, Jones A, Ledson J, McDonnell K, Duirs N, Humphreys AL. A comparative study of cognitive behavioural therapy and shared reading for chronic pain. Med Humanit. 2017 Sep;43(3):155-165. doi: 10.1136/medh — View Citation

Davis J. Enjoying and enduring: groups reading aloud for wellbeing. Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):714-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60426-8. No abstract available. — View Citation

Korner A, Roberts N, Steele RJ, Brosseau DC, Rosberger Z. A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a self-administered psycho-educational intervention for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.pec — View Citation

Malibiran R, Tariman JD, Amer K. Bibliotherapy: Appraisal of Evidence for Patients Diagnosed With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Aug 1;22(4):377-380. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.377-380. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Feasibility of the intervention: Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised	Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised	Interviews at 12 weeks after the first reading session
Other	Feasibility of the intervention by looking at number of reading sessions per dyad	Number of reading sessions organized	Six months
Other	Feasibility of the intervention measured with in-depth interviews	Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised	Interviews after six months of the first reading session
Primary	Acceptability of the intervention	In-depth interview will be used to seek feedback on how well the reading session are received by the patients and the students	Interviews after six months of the first reading session
Secondary	Impact of the intervention	Impact on Quality of Life measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30 questionnaire, score range 0-100, 100 is better score	Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months;
Secondary	Impact of intervention in student by the use of in-depth interviews	Impact on professional development of students in Medicine and Health Sciences by performing in-depth interviews	In-depth interviews at 12 weeks and after six months of the first reading session
Secondary	Acceptability of the intervention	In-depth interview will be used to seek feedback on how well the reading session are received by the patients and the students	Interviews after 3 months of the first reading session
Secondary	Effect on quality of life of patients	Effect of quality of life with the McGill Quality of Life Scale, range 0-10, higher score is better score	Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months
Secondary	Effect on mood of patients	Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, range 0-21, higher score is worse score	Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months
Secondary	Effect on depression of patients	Patient Health Questionnaire-9, range 0-27, higher score is worse score	Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months