Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT01506973 |
Other study ID # |
UPCC 19211 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 1/Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 2011 |
Est. completion date |
March 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2022 |
Source |
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In this Phase I/II clinical trial, the investigators seek to pilot the addition of
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to a commonly-used front-line therapy of pancreatic cancer,
gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. The investigators plan a run-in to define tolerable doses, and
will explore doses of 800 and 1200 mg/day in successive cohorts of 6 patients. The
investigators will assess toxicity continuously, and determine the dose for the Phase II
trial based on standard toxicity criteria.
The correlative endpoints of this trial are directed to the pharmacokinetics of HCQ, and
pharmacokinetic model of HCQ based on data from several ongoing trials, and the data from
these patients will contribute to refining the model. The investigators will analyze both
measured and model-predicted indices for their relationship to autophagy induction. Autophagy
will be assessed as the accumulation of autophagocytic vesicles in the PMNs of treated
patients, together with the induction of the expression of autophagy-related proteins on
western analysis, quantitated by densitometry. The investigators will document the rates of
metabolic response as a consequence of treatment, as a therapeutic marker that may be related
to the degree of autophagy inhibition. Since the investigators have previously demonstrated a
key role of JNK1 in the induction of autophagy by chemotherapy, the investigators will
analyze archival tumor materials to determine variability in this marker, as a baseline for
potential future trials. Finally, this study will incorporate metabolic profiling by mass
spectrometry, which will be related to mutations (including Kras) in pretreatment tumor
specimens. Mutational analysis will be accomplished by targeted sequencing or by
next-generation sequencing, and the need for fresh tissue for all these endpoints will
require patients to have a biopsy performed before treatment at at 6-8 weeks after beginning
treatment. In the previous study of the Hh inhibitor GDC-0973 with the same chemotherapy, the
investigators were able to obtain repeat biopsies successfully on all patients. The
importance of these biopsies, to move the science forward in an era in which the tools now
exist to provide meaningful correlative science, cannot be overstated.
Description:
Recent strategies have focused on improving the efficacy of gemcitabine either by improving
the method of delivery, or by combining gemcitabine with other non-cross resistant agents. A
sequence of Phase III combination studies of gemcitabine in combination (with oxaliplatin,
and with the targeted therapies bevacizumab and cetuximab) have been negative, though based
on strikingly positive Phase II data generated in cancer centers. Several studies suggest
that taxanes are active in pancreatic cancer, but a randomized trial of gemcitabine with
taxanes has not been preformed, probably on the basis that the differences in Phase II were
insufficiently persuasive. The development of a novel taxane conjugate with albumin,
abraxane, with established activity in breast cancer, prompted a Phase II trial of
gemcitabine/abraxane by Von Hoff (6). Phase I/II data were highly promising, with response
rates of the order of 40%, with tolerable toxicity, and a one-year survival of about 48%. A
phase III trial of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine/abraxane is in progress, and based on these
promising data has served as the control chemotherapy for previous SU2C trials. The
development of a more intensive, but toxic regimen (FOLFIRINOX) in no way diminishes the
enthusiasm for this chemotherapy backbone, given the activity in Phase II trials that appears
comparable (7). Given the promise of this regimen, and the possibility of making a
substantial improvement in outcome with additional targeted interventions, we propose to
continue to use this regimen in the current study.
Of particular interest in extending these studies to pancreatic cancer is the finding that
autophagy inhibition is particularly deleterious to cell lines bearing a mutant Kras protein.
Additional studies as part of the SU2C pancreatic cancer project reveal that an autophagy
program is activated in the presence of mutant Kras, and thus prompts the testing of this
strategy in a setting in which Kras is commonly (about 85%) mutated (SU2C, unpublished data).