Advance Care Planning for Critical Care - A Prelude to Breaking Barriers

Advance Care Planning Clinical Trial

Official title:

Advance Care Planning for Critical Care - A Prelude to Breaking Barriers

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02797444
• Other study ID #: 106476
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 31, 2016
• Last updated: September 27, 2017
• Start date: September 2015
• Est. completion date: June 2017

Study information

• Verified date: February 2016
• Source: Lawson Health Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process of 'reflection and communication, in which a person with decision-making capacity makes decisions regarding their future health and/or personal care in the event that they become incapable of consenting to or refusing treatment' Most Canadians have not planned for end-of-life Care and are at risk of aggressive medical care that may not be compatible with their wishes. This study aims to systematically evaluate local barriers to making personal choices with regards to life support interventions that can be provided in the contemporary Intensive Care Unit.

Description:

HYPOTHESIS: The overarching hypothesis is that the average layperson lacks sufficient knowledge about the aggressive life support measures used routinely in contemporary Critical Care to make informed decisions for themselves and their loved ones. Considering that most Canadians have not even heard of the term Advance Care Planning, it is likely that there is a gap in their knowledge and expectations of Critical Care. Such a gap can be bridged through education - the only caveat being that the individual should be in full possession of their faculties and can make informed decisions. This point is critical.

Thus this study uses a mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) research design to address the following questions: 1) What is the state of knowledge about Critical Care interventions among healthy elderly laypersons in London, Ontario? 2) What are the barriers to formulating ACPs? 3) What opportunities exist for increasing ACP in the healthy elderly population? The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Secondary Objectives are 1) To evaluate local barriers to Advance Care Planning 2) To determine effective modes of education for Advance Care Planning that could be used for the community and in our hospital setting.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 2017
• Est. primary completion date: June 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 55 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Members from the community who are i) > 55 yrs of age, ii) living in London Middlesex community, iii) not housebound, iv) in apparent good health and iv) have the ability to make independent decisions for themselves

Exclusion Criteria:

• Factors that preclude a meaningful interview (such as cognitive impairment, aphasia, profound hearing impairment, language barriers) or anticipated emotional burden with the proposed topic.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Advance Care Planning
• End of Life Care

Intervention

Other:
• semi-structured interviews

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Dr. Ravi Taneja	London	Ontario
Canada	London Health Sciences Centre	London	Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Lawson Health Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (1)

Teixeira AA, Hanvey L, Tayler C, Barwich D, Baxter S, Heyland DK; Canadian Researchers at End of Life Network (CARENET). What do Canadians think of advanced care planning? Findings from an online opinion poll. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;5(1):40-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000473. Epub 2013 Oct 4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Lay person perception and knowledge of various Critical Care interventions	This is a qualitative study. The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Examples of such interventions include but are not limited to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis and artificial feeding. Outcomes involve lay person knowledge, beliefs and perceptions of Critical care from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans.	1 year