Adolescent Epilepsy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Design Phase II b Study of Safety and Efficacy of MGCND00EP1 as an Add on Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Resistant Epilepsies
NCT number | NCT04406948 |
Other study ID # | MGC-002 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Phase | Phase 2 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 30, 2024 |
Est. completion date | May 30, 2024 |
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | MGC Pharmaceuticals d.o.o |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
EudraCT: 2018-003887-29 Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of: MGCND00EP1 from MGC PHARMACEUTICALS d.o.o. Study Design: Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled parallel grouped study Sample Size: 103 subjects Study Population: Children from 1 year to 18 years of age Comparator Product :Placebo solution, oral IMP Product : MGCND00EP1 (each ml of solution containing 100 mg of cannabidiol and 5 mg of (-)-trans-Δ9- tetrahydrocannabinol as active substance) from MGC PHARMACEUTICALS D.O.O. According to dosing scheme up to 25 mg/kg BW per day or maximum daily dose 800 mg (whichever smaller) for 6 weeks titration and 6 weeks of treatment, oral administration
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | May 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | May 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 1 Year to 18 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient has documented clinically confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy; - Patient did not respond to at least 2 AED's therapy given in adequate doses; - Patients current therapy is considered inadequate (not completely controlled by AEDs); patients had four or more countable seizures with a motor component per 4 week period; - Patient is aged 1 year - 18 years inclusive at screening age; - Patient took one or more AEDs treatment at dose which has been stable for at least 4 weeks before enrolment; - Females of childbearing potential can only participate in the study if willing to use acceptable, effective methods of contraception during the trial and for three month after end of trial participation as defined in point 7.10 of this protocol; - Patient/parent is able to read/understand informed consent. - Male patients must either be surgically sterile or he and his female spouse/partner who is of childbearing potential must be willing to use highly effective methods of contraception consisting of 2 forms of birth control (1 of which must be a barrier method) starting at screening and continuing throughout the study. - All medications or interventions for epilepsy (including ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) were stable for four weeks prior to screening and participants were willing to maintain a stable regimen throughout the study. The ketogenic diet and VNS treatments are not counted as an AED. Exclusion Criteria: - Known history or presence of clinically significant unstable medical condition other that epilepsy which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject or impact the validity of the study results. - Known history or presence of serious cardiovascular disease - Known or suspected history or family history of: schizophrenia, or other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder. - Known or suspected allergy hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to cannabinoids or any other drug substances with similar activity or to any of the excipients of the IMP. - Participant has clinically relevant abnormalities in the 12-lead electrocardiogram measured at screening or randomisation. - Patients were currently using or had in the past used recreational or medicinal cannabis or synthetic CBD based medications or preparations within last 3 months or had previous or current treatment with cannabis-based therapy within last 3 months. - History of drug or alcohol addiction requiring treatment. - History of malabsorption within the last year or presence of clinically significant gastrointestinal disease or surgery that may affect drug bioavailability, including but not limited to cholecystectomy. - Presence of hepatic or renal dysfunction. - Females who: are pregnant (serum hCG level consistent with pregnancy diagnosis); or are lactating; - Participation in a clinical trial that involved administration of an investigational medicinal product within 90 days prior to drug administration, or recent participation in a clinical investigation that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize subject safety or the integrity of the study results; - Participant has clinically significant abnormal laboratory values (e.g. liver enzymes); - Participant has clinically significant findings from a physical examination (fever); - In case of ketogenic diet or VNS; the diet need to be stable for at least 4 weeks, and VNS ramping needs to be stable at least 12 weeks before enrolment. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Israel | Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel | Petach Tikvah | Central District |
Slovenia | University Children's Hospital Ljubljana University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Ljubljana |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
MGC Pharmaceuticals d.o.o |
Israel, Slovenia,
Bent S. Herbal medicine in the United States: review of efficacy, safety, and regulation: grand rounds at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0632-y. Epub 2008 Apr 16. — View Citation
Berg AT, Zelko FA, Levy SR, Testa FM. Age at onset of epilepsy, pharmacoresistance, and cognitive outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2012 Sep 25;79(13):1384-91. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826c1b55. Epub 2012 Sep 12. — View Citation
Bergamaschi MM, Queiroz RH, Zuardi AW, Crippa JA. Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent. Curr Drug Saf. 2011 Sep 1;6(4):237-49. doi: 10.2174/157488611798280924. — View Citation
Bornheim LM, Everhart ET, Li J, Correia MA. Induction and genetic regulation of mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 by cannabidiol. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994 Jul 5;48(1):161-71. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90236-4. — View Citation
Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37. — View Citation
Chesher GB, Jackson DM, Malor RM. Interaction of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol with phenobarbitone in protecting mice from electrically induced convulsions. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1975 Aug;27(8):608-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1975.tb09515.x. No abstract available. — View Citation
Cilio MR, Thiele EA, Devinsky O. The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014 Jun;55(6):787-90. doi: 10.1111/epi.12635. Epub 2014 May 22. — View Citation
Conway L, Widjaja E, Smith ML, Speechley KN, Ferro MA. Validating the shortened Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55) in a sample of children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):646-656. doi: 10.1111/epi.13697. Epub 2017 Feb 15. — View Citation
Cortesi M, Fusar-Poli P. Potential therapeutical effects of cannabidiol in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(4):920-1. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.09.030. Epub 2006 Nov 16. No abstract available. — View Citation
Dan B. Cannabinoids in paediatric neurology. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Nov;57(11):984. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12926. No abstract available. — View Citation
Devinsky O, Cilio MR, Cross H, Fernandez-Ruiz J, French J, Hill C, Katz R, Di Marzo V, Jutras-Aswad D, Notcutt WG, Martinez-Orgado J, Robson PJ, Rohrback BG, Thiele E, Whalley B, Friedman D. Cannabidiol: pharmacology and potential therapeutic role in epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Epilepsia. 2014 Jun;55(6):791-802. doi: 10.1111/epi.12631. Epub 2014 May 22. — View Citation
Devinsky O, Marsh E, Friedman D, Thiele E, Laux L, Sullivan J, Miller I, Flamini R, Wilfong A, Filloux F, Wong M, Tilton N, Bruno P, Bluvstein J, Hedlund J, Kamens R, Maclean J, Nangia S, Singhal NS, Wilson CA, Patel A, Cilio MR. Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: an open-label interventional trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Mar;15(3):270-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00379-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):352. — View Citation
Devinsky O, Vickrey BG, Cramer J, Perrine K, Hermann B, Meador K, Hays RD. Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia. 1995 Nov;36(11):1089-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00467.x. — View Citation
Donner EJ. Opportunity gained, opportunity lost: treating pharmacoresistant epilepsy in children. Epilepsia. 2013 May;54 Suppl 2:16-8. doi: 10.1111/epi.12178. — View Citation
Geffrey AL, Pollack SF, Bruno PL, Thiele EA. Drug-drug interaction between clobazam and cannabidiol in children with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2015 Aug;56(8):1246-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13060. Epub 2015 Jun 26. — View Citation
Gloss D, Vickrey B. Cannabinoids for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD009270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009270.pub2. — View Citation
Goldstein B. Cannabis in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy. O'Shaugnessy's 2016:7-9.
Goodwin SW, Lambrinos AI, Ferro MA, Sabaz M, Speechley KN. Development and assessment of a shortened Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55). Epilepsia. 2015 Jun;56(6):864-72. doi: 10.1111/epi.13000. Epub 2015 Apr 25. — View Citation
Hess EJ, Moody KA, Geffrey AL, Pollack SF, Skirvin LA, Bruno PL, Paolini JL, Thiele EA. Cannabidiol as a new treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsia. 2016 Oct;57(10):1617-1624. doi: 10.1111/epi.13499. Epub 2016 Oct 3. — View Citation
Izquierdo I, Tannhauser M. Letter: The effect of cannabidiol on maximal electroshock seizures in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1973 Nov;25(11):916-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1973.tb09976.x. No abstract available. — View Citation
Jones NA, Hill AJ, Smith I, Bevan SA, Williams CM, Whalley BJ, Stephens GJ. Cannabidiol displays antiepileptiform and antiseizure properties in vitro and in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Feb;332(2):569-77. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.159145. Epub 2009 Nov 11. — View Citation
Koppel BS, Brust JC, Fife T, Bronstein J, Youssof S, Gronseth G, Gloss D. Systematic review: efficacy and safety of medical marijuana in selected neurologic disorders: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2014 Apr 29;82(17):1556-63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000363. — View Citation
Maa E, Figi P. The case for medical marijuana in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014 Jun;55(6):783-6. doi: 10.1111/epi.12610. Epub 2014 May 22. — View Citation
Mortati K, Dworetzky B, Devinsky O. Marijuana: an effective antiepileptic treatment in partial epilepsy? A case report and review of the literature. Rev Neurol Dis. 2007 Spring;4(2):103-6. — View Citation
Mula M. Investigational new drugs for focal epilepsy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016;25(1):1-5. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1110144. Epub 2015 Nov 4. — View Citation
O'Connell BK, Gloss D, Devinsky O. Cannabinoids in treatment-resistant epilepsy: A review. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt B):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Feb 8. — View Citation
Ohlsson A, Lindgren JE, Wahlen A, Agurell S, Hollister LE, Gillespie HK. Plasma delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations and clinical effects after oral and intravenous administration and smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Sep;28(3):409-16. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1980.181. — View Citation
Porter BE, Jacobson C. Report of a parent survey of cannabidiol-enriched cannabis use in pediatric treatment-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Dec;29(3):574-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.037. — View Citation
Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704. — View Citation
Press CA, Knupp KG, Chapman KE. Parental reporting of response to oral cannabis extracts for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Apr;45:49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.043. Epub 2015 Apr 3. — View Citation
Reddy DS, Golub VM. The Pharmacological Basis of Cannabis Therapy for Epilepsy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Apr;357(1):45-55. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.230151. Epub 2016 Jan 19. — View Citation
Russo EB. History of cannabis and its preparations in saga, science, and sobriquet. Chem Biodivers. 2007 Aug;4(8):1614-48. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200790144. — View Citation
Sativex smpc , 20.09.2018
Sharp GB, Samanta D, Willis E. Options for pharmacoresistant epilepsy in children: when medications don't work. Pediatr Ann. 2015 Feb;44(2):e43-8. doi: 10.3928/00904481-20150203-11. — View Citation
Tzadok M, Uliel-Siboni S, Linder I, Kramer U, Epstein O, Menascu S, Nissenkorn A, Yosef OB, Hyman E, Granot D, Dor M, Lerman-Sagie T, Ben-Zeev B. CBD-enriched medical cannabis for intractable pediatric epilepsy: The current Israeli experience. Seizure. 2016 Feb;35:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 6. — View Citation
Volkow ND, Compton WM, Weiss SR. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):879. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1407928. No abstract available. — View Citation
Wall ME, Sadler BM, Brine D, Taylor H, Perez-Reyes M. Metabolism, disposition, and kinetics of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in men and women. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Sep;34(3):352-63. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.179. — View Citation
Zaccara G, Giovannelli F, Schmidt D. Placebo and nocebo responses in drug trials of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Feb;43:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 19. — View Citation
Zuardi AW, Crippa JA, Hallak JE, Moreira FA, Guimaraes FS. Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, as an antipsychotic drug. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006 Apr;39(4):421-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006000400001. Epub 2006 Apr 3. — View Citation
* Note: There are 39 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The proportion of patients showing a >50% reduction in frequency of seizures at week 12 of the study, in the treatment versus placebo groups | study drug overall efficiency as a seizure reducing treatment compared to placebo group | 12 weeks | |
Primary | Change in number of epileptic seizures as documented by patient diaries (Visit 2 level compared to Visit 3 level and Visit 4) in treatment and placebo group. | study drug overall efficiency as a seizure reducing treatment | 16 weeks | |
Secondary | The incidence of adverse events will be summarized by organ class, severity and duration on weeks 12 and 18 of the study. | Adverse events assessment | 12-18 weeks | |
Secondary | Any change in physical examination, vital signs, lab tests results, ect will be collected and analyzed. | Improvement in vital signs, lab test results and physical examination | 18 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in duration of epileptic seizures as documented by patient diaries (Visit 2 level compared to Visit 3 level and Visit 4 level compared to Visit 2 level) by treatment group. | seizure frequency assessment | 12-18 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in score from Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire 55 (QOLCE-55 questionnaire) scoring 0-100 points, higher scoring indicates better condition. scoring will be compared between Visit 2 level and Visit 4 level. | QoL questionnaire assessment | 18 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI scale) scoring 1-7 points, low scoring indicates better condition. Visit 2 level compared to Visit 4 level by treatment group. | CGI improvement by treatment group | 18 weeks | |
Secondary | Percentage of MGCND00EP1-treated patients who will develop a response to MGCND00EP1 (response will be defined as a reduction of seizures frequency by at least 25 % ) as compared between Visit 2 level and Visit 4 level | response to MGCND00EP1 | 18 weeks | |
Secondary | Proportion of seizure-free patients between the placebo and treatment group on week 12 of treatment (including titration). | Proportion of seizure-free patients | 12 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in form of new seizures and emergency of new forms will be monitored during the trial | New seizure or seizure form emergency | 18 weeks |