Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02112058
Other study ID # HHS-233-03-0034
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received March 25, 2014
Last updated April 9, 2014
Start date February 2007
Est. completion date July 2012

Study information

Verified date April 2014
Source MDRC
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The Supporting Healthy Marriage (SHM) evaluation was launched in 2003 to test the effectiveness of a skills-based relationship education program designed to help low- and modest-income married couples strengthen their relationships and to support more stable and more nurturing home environments and more positive outcomes for parents and their children. The evaluation was led by MDRC with Abt Associates and other partners, and it was sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families, in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

SHM was a voluntary, year long, marriage education program for lower-income, married couples who had children or were expecting a child. The program provided group workshops based on structured curricula; supplemental activities to build on workshop themes; and family support services to address participation barriers, connect families with other services, and reinforce curricular themes. The study's random assignment design compared outcomes for families who were offered SHM's services with outcomes for a similar group of families who were not but could access other services in the community.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 6298
Est. completion date July 2012
Est. primary completion date July 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- To be eligible for the study, couples were supposed to be low income, married, at least 18 years old, and either expecting a child or parents of a child under age 18 who was living in their home -- though couples were not required to provide any documentation verifying that they met these eligibility criteria.

- They also had to understand one of the languages in which SHM services were offered (English or, in some locations, Spanish).

Exclusion Criteria:

- Indication of domestic violence in the relationship

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label


Intervention

Behavioral:
A Family-Strengthening Program for Low-Income Families
The program's central and most intensive component was a series of relationship and marriage education workshops for groups of couples that was offered in the first four to five months of enrollment in the program. Complementing the workshops was a second component, offered for the year after enrollment, that consisted of supplemental activities: educational and social events that were intended to build on and reinforce lessons from the curricula. The third component, family support services, paired couples with a specialized staff member who maintained contact with them and facilitated their participation in the other two components throughout the duration of the program.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University Behavioral Associates Bronx New York
United States Texas Department of Health and Human Services Houston Texas
United States MDRC New York New York
United States Public Strategies, Inc Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Community Prevention Partnership of Berks County Reading Pennsylvania
United States Becoming Parents Program, Inc Seattle Washington
United States Center for Human Services Shoreline Washington
United States Catholic Charities Wichita Kansas

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
MDRC Abt Associates, Child Trends, Optimal Solutions Group, Public Strategies, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (12)

Fein, David J. (2004). Married and Poor: Basic Characteristics of Economically Disadvantaged Couples in the U.S. Working Paper.

Fein, David J. (2009). Spending Time Together: Time Use Estimates for Economically Disadvantaged and Nondisadvantaged Married Couples in the United States. Working Paper.

Gubits, Daniel, Amy E. Lowenstein, Jorgen Harris, and JoAnn Hsueh (2014). Do the Effects of a Relationship Education Program Vary for Different Types of Couples? Exploratory Subgroup Analysis in the Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation. OPRE Report 2014

Hsueh, JoAnn, Desiree Principe Alderson, Erika Lundquist, Charles Michalopoulos, Daniel Gubits, and David Fein (2012). The Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation: Early Impacts on Low-Income Families, Technical Supplement. OPRE Report 2012-27. Washington,

Hsueh, JoAnn, Desiree Principe Alderson, Erika Lundquist, Charles Michalopoulos, Daniel Gubits, David Fein, and Virginia Knox (2012). The Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation: Early Impacts on Low Income Families. OPRE Report 2012-11. Washington, DC: Of

Knox, Virginia and David J. Fein (2008). Designing a Marriage Education Demonstration and Evaluation for Low-Income Married Couples. Working Paper.

Lloyd, Chrishana M., Ashley Weech, Jennifer Miller Gaubert (2014). Perspectives of Low-Income African-American and Latino Couples on Relationship Education. Working Paper.

Lowenstein, Amy E., Noemi Altman, Patricia M. Chou, Kristen Faucetta, Adam Greeney, Daniel Gubits, Jorgen Harris, JoAnn Hsueh, Erika Lundquist, Charles Michalopoulos, and Vinh Q. Nguyen (2014). A Family-Strengthening Program for Low-Income Families: Final

Lundquist, Erika, JoAnn Hsueh, Amy E. Lowenstein, Kristen Faucetta, Daniel Gubits, Charles Michalopoulos, and Virginia Knox (2014). A Family-Strengthening Program for Low-Income Families: Final Impacts from the Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation. OPRE

Miller Gaubert, Jennifer, Daniel Gubits, Desiree Principe Alderson, and Virginia Knox (2012). The Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation: Final Implementation Findings. OPRE Report 2012-12. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Admi

Miller Gaubert, Jennifer, Virginia Knox, Desiree Principe Alderson, Christopher Dalton, Kate Fletcher, and Meghan McCormick. Early Lessons from the Implementation of a Relationship and Marriage Skills Program for Low-Income Married Couples. 2010. MDRC.

Supporting Healthy Marriage Toolkit: Resources for Program Operators from the Supporting Healthy Marriage Demonstration and Evaluation. 2011. MDRC.

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percent Married at 12 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. A couple is considered married if both spouses report that they are married or in a committed relationship. If either respondent indicates that the couple is separated, divorced, or had the marriage annulled, the outcome is coded with a negative (0) response. If only one spouse responds, that response is used for the couple. 12 months No
Primary Couples' average report of relationship happiness at 12 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. Respondents are asked how happy they are with their marriages. If both spouses respond to this question, the average of the responses is used. If only one spouse responds, the single response is used. 12 months No
Primary Either spouse reported marriage in trouble at 12 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. Respondents are asked whether they thought that their marriage was in trouble in the past three months. If either spouse answers by saying that they were "divorced more than three months ago," the outcome is not created. Otherwise, if either spouse indi-cates that he or she had thought that their marriage was in trouble, an affirmative outcome is created. 12 months No
Primary Reports of warmth and support at 12 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Warmth and support is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing warmth and support in a couple's relationship. Example items include "My spouse expresses love and affection toward me"; "My spouse listens to me when I need someone to talk to"; and "I trust my spouse completely." 12 months No
Primary Reports of positive communication skills at 12 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Positive communication skills is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing how the couple communicates during disagreements. Example items include "My spouse understands that there are times when I do not feel like talking and times when I do"; "We are good at working out our differences"; and "During arguments, my spouse and I are good at taking breaks when we need them." 12 months No
Primary Reports of negative behavior and emotions at 12 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Negative behavior and emotions is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing negative interactions that occur during disagreements. Example items include "My spouse was rude and mean to me when we disagreed"; "My spouse seemed to view my words or actions more negatively than I meant them to be"; and "My spouse has yelled or screamed at me." 12 months No
Primary Neither spouse reported infidelity at 12 Months This outcome is examined at the couple level. It measures whether either respondent reported cheating on the spouse with someone else or either respondent believes that the spouse had "definitely" cheated with someone else in the past three months. 12 months No
Primary Reports of psychological abuse at 12 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. Psychological abuse is the average of the responses to six items. Example items include "Have you felt afraid that your spouse would hurt you?" "Has your spouse accused you of having an affair?" and "Has your spouse tried to keep you from seeing or talking with your friends or family?" 12 months No
Primary Reports of any physical assault at 12 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. The measure indicates any physical assault in the past three months. The measure is created from responses to questions adapted from the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale.* 12 months No
Primary Individual psychological distress at 12 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. The measure is created from responses to the K6 Mental Health Screening Tool. 12 months No
Primary Men's and women's reports of cooperative coparenting at 12 Months Cooperative coparenting reflects the average of five responses to parent-reported items. An example item is "How well the respondent gets along with the spouse when it comes to parenting." 12 months No
Primary Paternal and maternal supportiveness of child Two subconstructs are included in this outcome: warmth (reported by parents and children) and involvement (reported by parents and children). The supportiveness outcome is the average of items in both subconstructs, for each reporter. Examples of parent-reported items (for warmth and involvement, respectively) are "Over the past month, how often respondent has told [focal child] that respondent loves him/her" and "In the past month how often respondent talked with [focal child] about his/her friends." Examples of child-reported items (for warmth and involvement, respectively) are "How often [mother/father] tells respondent that he/she is doing a good job" and "In the past month, did respondent go with [mother/father] on an outing to a library, park, or playground?" 30 months No
Primary Paternal and maternal responsiveness to child Both parent reports and child reports are used to measure parental responsiveness. An example of a parent-reported item is "In the past month, how often respondent has considered [focal child's] thoughts and feelings when making rules for him/her." An example of a child-reported item is "Whether [fa-ther/mother] respects respondent's feelings." 30 months No
Primary Paternal and maternal hostility toward child Both parent reports and child reports are used to measure parental hostility. An example of a parent-reported item is "How often respondent has yelled, shouted, screamed at, or threatened [focal child] because he/she was mad at [him/her]." An example of a child-reported item is "How often [fa-ther/mother] gets really mad at respondent." 30 months No
Primary Paternal and maternal harsh discipline This outcome is created from a single parent-reported item: "How often respondent has hit, spanked, grabbed, or used physical punishment with [focal child] over the past month." 30 months No
Primary Child self-regulation This outcome is examined for children ages 2 to 17 and is measured using three direct child assessment scores* and maternal, paternal, and child reports. Maternal- and paternal-reported measures reflect the averages of responses to ten items, including "[Focal child] thinks before acting." The child-reported measure reflects the average of responses to sixteen items, including "Respondent waits his/her turn during activities." 30 months No
Primary Child internalizing behavior problems This outcome is examined for children ages 2 to 17 and is measured using maternal, paternal, and child reports. Maternal- and paternal-reported measures reflect the average of responses to eight items for children ages 2 to 4 and twelve items for children ages 2 to 17, including "[Focal child] is unhappy, sad, or depressed." The child-reported measure reflects the average of responses to twelve items, including "Respondent worries about things." 30 months No
Primary Child externalizing behavior problems This outcome is examined for children ages 2 to 17 and is measured using maternal, paternal, and child reports. Maternal- and paternal-reported measures reflect the average of responses to fourteen items for children ages 2 to 4 and fifteen items for children ages 2 to 17, including "[Focal child] is disobedient at home." The child-reported measure reflects the average of responses to nine items, including "Respondent argues a lot." 30 months No
Primary Child cognitive and academic performance This outcome is examined for children ages 2 to 17 and is measured using two direct child assessment scores* and maternal, paternal, and child reports. Maternal- and paternal-reported measures are based on a single item: "Based on respondent's knowledge of [focal child's] schoolwork, how well is he/she currently doing in school?" The child-reported measure is also based on a single item: "Overall, what grades did the respondent receive last year or the last full year of school that he/she completed?" 30 months No
Primary Percent Married at 30 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. A couple is considered married if both spouses report that they are married or in a committed relationship. If either respondent indicates that the couple is separated, divorced, or had the marriage annulled, the outcome is coded with a negative (0) response. If only one spouse responds, that response is used for the couple. 30 months No
Primary Couples' average report of relationship happiness at 30 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. Respondents are asked how happy they are with their marriages. If both spouses respond to this question, the average of the responses is used. If only one spouse responds, the single response is used. 30 months No
Primary Either spouse reported marriage in trouble at 30 Months The outcome is examined at the couple level. Respondents are asked whether they thought that their marriage was in trouble in the past three months. If either spouse answers by saying that they were "divorced more than three months ago," the outcome is not created. Otherwise, if either spouse indi-cates that he or she had thought that their marriage was in trouble, an affirmative outcome is created. 30 months No
Primary Reports of warmth and support at 30 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Warmth and support is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing warmth and support in a couple's relationship. Example items include "My spouse expresses love and affection toward me"; "My spouse listens to me when I need someone to talk to"; and "I trust my spouse completely." 30 months No
Primary Reports of positive communication skills at 30 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Positive communication skills is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing how the couple communicates during disagreements. Example items include "My spouse understands that there are times when I do not feel like talking and times when I do"; "We are good at working out our differences"; and "During arguments, my spouse and I are good at taking breaks when we need them." 30 months No
Primary Reports of negative behavior and emotions at 30 Months The outcome is examined separately for men and women. Negative behavior and emotions is the average of the responses to seven items aimed at capturing negative interactions that occur during disagreements. Example items include "My spouse was rude and mean to me when we disagreed"; "My spouse seemed to view my words or actions more negatively than I meant them to be"; and "My spouse has yelled or screamed at me." 30 months No
Primary Neither spouse reported infidelity at 30 Months This outcome is examined at the couple level. It measures whether either respondent reported cheating on the spouse with someone else or either respondent believes that the spouse had "definitely" cheated with someone else in the past three months. 30 months No
Primary Reports of psychological abuse at 30 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. Psychological abuse is the average of the responses to six items. Example items include "Have you felt afraid that your spouse would hurt you?" "Has your spouse accused you of having an affair?" and "Has your spouse tried to keep you from seeing or talking with your friends or family?" 30 months No
Primary Reports of any physical assault at 30 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. The measure indicates any physical assault in the past three months. The measure is created from responses to questions adapted from the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale.* 30 months No
Primary Individual psychological distress at 30 Months This outcome is examined separately for men and women. The measure is created from responses to the K6 Mental Health Screening Tool. 30 months No
Primary Men's and women's reports of cooperative coparenting at 30 Months Cooperative coparenting reflects the average of five responses to parent-reported items. An example item is "How well the respondent gets along with the spouse when it comes to parenting." 30 months No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05071989 - The Influence of Sleep Education With Social Media Reminders on the Sleep Quality in Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT05064293 - Assisted Identification and Navigation of Early Mental Health Symptoms in Children N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05017779 - A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial of a High School-based Executive Function Treatment for Autistic Youth N/A
Completed NCT03685643 - Study Proposal for Web Based Intervention to Promote the Safe Usage of Dating Applications in Young Adults N/A
Completed NCT03270943 - The S.M.A.R.T. Project: Stress Management and Resilience Training for Teens N/A
Recruiting NCT05525962 - Vulnerability/Resilience Factors Influencing the Developmental Trajectories and Adaptive Methods of Children and Adolescents in Child Welfare System.
Completed NCT03411577 - Development and Testing of a Jamaican Mother-daughter HIV Risk-reduction Program N/A
Recruiting NCT05334381 - Navigating Mental Health Treatment for Black Youth N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05926141 - Advanced Cooking Education Pilot Study N/A
Recruiting NCT04317547 - Translation Study of a Safe Teen Driving Intervention N/A
Recruiting NCT06001892 - Tennessee Youth Prepared for Success N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06127277 - Next4You: A Fully Mobile Relationships Based Program for Youth in Foster Care N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06310434 - Analysis of COMPASsion and Humanisation of Adolescents Facing the End-of-life Processes.
Not yet recruiting NCT05316948 - Mental Health and Sexuality in Adolescents and Young Adults
Terminated NCT02578147 - JUEGA: A Fun Study for Hispanic/Latino Adolescent Girls N/A
Completed NCT02683811 - Effectiveness of the Updated Version of the School-based Program Diario Della Salute (DDS-2) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02329015 - Curriculum Evaluation of a Novel Health and Wellness Program Within New York City Schools Phase 1
Completed NCT03482687 - It's Your Game: An Innovative Approach to Preventing Teen Dating Violence N/A
Completed NCT01433679 - The Effect of a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention on Physical Activity Levels in Adolescents N/A
Completed NCT00056953 - Peer Mentors for Adolescents in HIV Affected Families Phase 2