Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04496167
Other study ID # EN3835-210
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date July 29, 2020
Est. completion date April 14, 2022

Study information

Verified date August 2023
Source Endo Pharmaceuticals
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of EN3835 for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (frozen shoulder).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 198
Est. completion date April 14, 2022
Est. primary completion date April 14, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Have idiopathic unilateral adhesive capsulitis (also known as frozen shoulder). 2. Have unaffected range of motion in the contralateral shoulder as determined by the investigator. 3. Be willing to undergo x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both affected and unaffected shoulder. 4. Agree to participate in supervised, in-office physical therapy sessions and to complete home exercises at designated time points during the study. 5. Agree to avoid general lifting and carrying during the study as instructed. 6. Be able to read, understand, and independently complete participant reported outcome instruments in English. 7. If female, be of non-childbearing potential (history of hysterectomy, bilateraloophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or postmenopausal with no history of menstrual flow in the 12 months prior to the Screening Visit); or, if of childbearing potential, be non-pregnant, non-lactating and agree to use effective contraception when with a male partner for the duration of the study (and for 28 days after any active treatment period for participant who early terminate). Acceptable forms of contraception include hormonal measures (oral contraceptive pills, contraceptive patch, contraceptive ring, and injections), intrauterine devices, double barrier method (condom plus diaphragm, condom or diaphragm plus spermicidal gel or foam), surgical sterilization of the male partner, and abstinence. 8. If male with reproductive potential, agree to use effective contraception (abstinence, surgical sterilization [vasectomy], or condom with spermicide) with a female partner of child-bearing potential for the duration of the study (and for 28 days after any active treatment period for participant who early terminate). 9. Be willing and able to cooperate with the requirements of the study. 10. Be adequately informed and understand the nature and risks of the study and be able to provide consent . Exclusion Criteria: 1. Has a known allergy to collagenase or any other excipient of EN3835 or any other procedural medication (including local anesthetics). 2. Has received treatment for adhesive capsulitis (in the timeframes outlined below) or is planning to receive any treatment (other than study treatment) for adhesive capsulitis at any time during the study in the affected shoulder, including but not limited to: - Physical therapy or acupuncture within 2 weeks before the first injection of study treatment. - Intra-articular or intrabursal injection(s) of lidocaine, suprascapular nerve blocks, or electroanalgesic and/or thermoanalgesic modalities within 1 month before the Screening Visit. - Intra-articular or intrabursal injection(s) of corticosteroids within 8 weeks before the Screening Visit. - Intra-articular or intrabursal injection(s) of sodium hyaluronate and/or glenohumeral distension arthrography within 3 months before the Screening Visit. - Manipulation under anaesthesia at any time prior to the study. - Surgery (including arthroscopic or open capsular release, capsulectomy, or capsulotomy) at any time prior to the study. 3. Has any abnormalities/conditions in the affected shoulder that would be potentially confounding as determined by the central MRI review committee grading criteria. 4. Has a prosthesis or replacement of right or left shoulder, elbow, wrist, and/or hand. 5. Has systemic conditions (malignancy, hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disease, thrombosis, physical impairment, infection, significant medical condition) that restricts study participation. 6. Has any contraindications for MRI (implant containing metal, internal metallic object, permanent cosmetics/make-up/tattoos, claustrophobia, anemia, uncontrolled hypertension, epilepsy, asthma, sickle cell disease) as determined by the technologist, the radiologist, and/or investigator performing the imaging, with exemption of the area to be treated/reviewed. 7. Has a known coagulation disorder or is taking any medications that would increase the risk of bleeding (except <150 milligrams of aspirin daily), 7 days prior to first injection and for the duration of the study. 8. Has received oral or parenteral steroids for any reason within 3 weeks before the Screening Visit. 9. Has, at any time, received collagenase for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis (including participant who received treatment in Study AUX-CC-870 or AUX-CC-871). 10. Has received treatment with an investigational product within 30 days (or 5 half lives, whichever is longer) of the screening visit. 11. Has received collagenase treatments (for example, Santyl® ointment and/or XIAFLEX/XIAPEX®) for any other indication within 30 days prior to study treatment administration, or is planning to be treated with collagenase (other than study treatment) at any time during the study. 12. Has donated blood within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or has plans to donate blood during the study. 13. Has a corrected QT interval (QTc) of = 450 milliseconds (ms) for male participant or =470 ms for female participant on the screening electrocardiogram (ECG). 14. Is from a vulnerable population, as defined by the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.111(b) and other local and national regulations, including but not limited to, employees (temporary, part-time, full-time, etc) or a family member of the research staff conducting the study, or of the sponsor, or of the contract research organization, or of the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC). 15. Has concurrent diseases that might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound the interpretation of the study results, or endanger the participant's well-being, (for example, evidence of any significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, renal, hepatic, or gastrointestinal disease). If there is a history of such disease but the condition has been stable for more than 5 year(s) and is judged by the investigator not to interfere with the participant's participation in the study, the participant may be included, with the documented approval of the Medical Monitor. 16. Has any other condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, might indicate the participant to be unsuitable for the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
EN3835
Collagenase clostridium histolyticum
Placebo
Placebo comparator

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #11 Altoona Pennsylvania
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #17 Bedford Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #19 Bellaire Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #24 Birmingham Alabama
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #38 Birmingham Alabama
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #33 Bradenton Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #3 Clearwater Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #32 Clermont Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #34 Dalton Georgia
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #4 Danville Virginia
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #6 Dayton Ohio
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #13 DeLand Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #37 Denver Colorado
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #21 Durham North Carolina
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #12 Encinitas California
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #1 Fort Lauderdale Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #15 Fort Worth Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #27 Georgetown Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #16 Huntington Beach California
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #7 Indiana Pennsylvania
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #18 La Mesa California
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #25 Laredo Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #26 Lawrenceville Georgia
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #8 Lincoln Nebraska
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #9 Mobile Alabama
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #36 Mooresville North Carolina
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #35 New Orleans Louisiana
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #30 Newnan Georgia
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #31 Oak Brook Illinois
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #14 Pasadena California
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #22 Plano Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #23 Plano Texas
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #5 State College Pennsylvania
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #28 Stockbridge Georgia
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #10 Stony Brook New York
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #2 Tampa Florida
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #29 Tucson Arizona
United States Endo Clinical Trial Site #20 Winter Park Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Endo Pharmaceuticals

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in the Adapted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Composite Score for the Affected Shoulder at Day 95 Adapted ASES is a self-administered participant reported outcome measure, divided into 2 sections: pain and function. Pain subscale is a single item, 11-point numeric rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain), calculated as 10 - pain raw score and multiplying by 5, score ranging from 0 (worst pain) to 50 (no pain). Function subscale consists of 10 activities, 4-point ordinal scale about their ability to do the activity with the affected arm, ranging from 0 (unable to do) to 3 (not difficult), calculated by multiplying total score for 10 items by 5 and then dividing it by 3, score range of 0 (no function) to 50 (full function).
Adapted ASES composite score is the sum of the pain subscale score (50% of the composite score) and function subscale score (50% of the composite score), score range of 0 (worst pain) to 100 (least pain). Positive change from Baseline score means an improvement in pain and/or shoulder function.
Baseline, Day 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder PROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder PROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder PROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder PROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected Shoulder PROM for shoulder extension was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline PROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline PROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline PROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline PROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in PROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline PROM for shoulder extension was measured using a goniometer. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder AROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder AROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder AROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder AROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected Shoulder AROM for shoulder extension was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement. Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline AROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. AROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. AROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline AROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. AROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. AROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline AROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer. AROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. AROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline AROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. AROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. AROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in AROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at Baseline AROM for shoulder extension was measured using a goniometer. AROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. AROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95.
Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder
Change from baseline was calculated as:
(Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Adapted ASES Composite Score The adapted ASES is a self-administered participant reported outcome measure, divided into 2 sections: pain and function. Pain subscale is a single item, 11-point numeric rating scale, ranging from (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain), calculated as 10 - pain raw score and multiplying by 5, score ranging from 0 (worst pain) to 50 (no pain). Function subscale consists of 10 activities, 4-point ordinal scale about their ability to do the activity with the affected arm, ranging from 0 (unable to do) to 3 (not difficult), calculated by multiplying the total score for 10 items by 5 and then dividing it by 3, score ranging from 0 (no function) to 50 (full function).
The adapted ASES composite score is the sum of the pain subscale score (50% of the composite score) and function subscale score (50% of the composite score). The range for composite score is 0 (worst pain) to 100 (least pain). Positive change from Baseline score means an improvement in pain and/or shoulder function.
Baseline, Day 22, 43, and 64
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Adapted ASES Function Subscale Score The adapted ASES function subscale consists of 10 activities, 4-point ordinal scale about their ability to do the activity with the affected arm, ranging from 0 (unable to do) to 3 (not difficult), calculated by multiplying the total score for 10 items by 5 and then dividing it by 3, score ranging from 0 (worst no function) to 50 (full function).
Positive change from Baseline score means an improvement in shoulder function.
Baseline, Day 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Adapted ASES Pain Subscale Score The adapted ASES pain subscale is a single item, 11-point numeric rating scale, ranging from (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain), calculated as 10 - pain raw score and multiplying by 5, score ranging from 0 (worst pain) to 50 (no pain). Positive change from Baseline score means an improvement in shoulder pain. Baseline, Day 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Pain Upon Movement (PUM) Scale Score for the Affected Shoulder The PUM scale is a single item 11-point numerical rating scale of pain in the affected shoulder after AROM forward flexion, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and shoulder extension on a scale from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be). A decrease from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, Days 64 and 95
Secondary Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Global Severity of Adhesive Capsulitis Scale The Patient-reported Global Severity of Adhesive Capsulitis is a single item, 11-point numerical rating scale that asks participants to rate the overall severity of their adhesive capsulitis symptoms on a scale from 0 (no severity) to 10 (severe as can be). A decrease from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, Day 22, 43, 64, and 95
Secondary Patient-reported Change in Severity of Adhesive Capsulitis Scale The Patient-reported Change in Severity of Adhesive Capsulitis is a questionnaire that asks participants if their adhesive capsulitis symptoms are "Better, About the Same, or Worse" since the last time the questionnaire was administered. Participants who reported that their symptoms are better or worse are then asked to rate the change in their symptoms on a 7-point ordinal scale for worse and better severity. An overall severity of worse was rated from 0 (almost the same, hardly worse at all) to -6 (a very great deal worse). An overall severity of better was rated from 0 (almost the same, hardly better at all) to 6 (a very great deal better).
Only participants with a response of 'Worse' or 'Better' were analyzed. Participants with an overall severity response of 'About the same' were excluded from the summary table below. For overall worse severity, a lower score indicated a worse outcome. For overall better severity, a higher score indicated a better outcome.
Days 22, 43, 64 and 95
Secondary Number of Responders Assessed With Investigator Assessment of Improvement Investigator assessment of improvement with treatment in the severity of the participant's treated shoulder using a 7-point Likert scale from very much worse (-3) to very much improved (3). A responder was defined as a response of "very much improved", "much improved" or "minimally improved" in the investigator assessment of improvement with treatment. Days 64 and 95
Secondary Number of Responders Assessed by the Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Assessment Participants rated their satisfaction with treatment on a 7-point Likert scale from very dissatisfied (-3) to very satisfied (3) at specified times for relief of pain in treated shoulder, relief of stiffness in treated shoulder, relief of pain in treated shoulder compared to better shoulder, and relief of stiffness in treated shoulder compared to better shoulder. A responder was defined as a participant with a response of "very satisfied", "satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" in the satisfaction with treatment. Days 64 and 95
Secondary Number of Participants Positive for Anti-AUX-I and Anti-AUX-II Antibodies Serum samples were collected and tested for the presence of anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibodies. Day 95
Secondary Number of Participants Positive for Neutralizing Antibodies Serum samples were collected and tested for the presence of anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibodies. Only samples positive for anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibodies were analyzed for neutralizing antibodies. Day 95
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03245476 - Education-based Physical Therapy Approach for Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Recruiting NCT03462420 - Physiotherapy Program for Managing Adhesive Capsulitis in Patients With Diabetes N/A
Recruiting NCT06181461 - Gong's Versus Kaltenborn Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT03678038 - Comparison of Rotator Interval Injection Versus Intraarticular Hydrodilatation in Frozen Shoulder N/A
Completed NCT01458691 - Intra-articular Injection of Allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) for Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Recruiting NCT01449227 - Natural Course of Adhesive Capsulitis of Hip N/A
Terminated NCT00875862 - Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis and Ambulatory Continuous Interscalene Nerve Blocks Phase 4
Completed NCT05398588 - Spencer's Muscle Energy Technique and Cyriax Deep Friction Massage on Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT05402540 - Effectiveness of SCS Technique Verses ART in Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Recruiting NCT03676829 - Embolization for the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Adhesive Capsulitis Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT06404814 - Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Spencer Technique in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT06019780 - Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT06062654 - Ultrasound-guided Hydrodistension in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT04822324 - Spencer's Muscle Energy Technique Along With Strain Counter Strain in Adhesive Capsulitis. N/A
Completed NCT05897866 - Sayed Issa's Hybrid Shoulder Arthroscopic-Open Surgical Management (HSSM) N/A
Recruiting NCT06041282 - Conservative Treatment of Early Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Withdrawn NCT03770546 - Amnion-Based Injections in the Shoulder N/A
Completed NCT06064396 - Effects of Gong's Mobilization With and Without Stecco Fascial Therapy in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT04852939 - Bowen's Technique in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis N/A
Completed NCT05655611 - Muscle Energy Technique With Or Without First Rib Mobilization In Adhesive Capsulitis N/A