The Effects of ADHD Medication (TEAM) Study

ADHD Clinical Trial

— TEAM  

Official title:

The Effects of ADHD Medication (TEAM) Study: Neurobehavioral Effects of Abrupt Methylphenidate Discontinuation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02293655
• Other study ID #: ADHDMedTEAMStudy
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: January 12, 2015
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: November 2023
• Source: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates the effects of receiving and then discontinuing methylphenidate (MPH) in children with ADHD. After receiving MPH for 8 weeks, participants will be randomized to either discontinue MPH (and receive placebo) OR remain on MPH for 4 weeks.

Description:

The stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) is the most commonly prescribed psychoactive medication in children. An abundance of studies attest to the efficacy of MPH for attenuating inattentive, hyperactive, and impulsive symptoms in children with ADHD. Despite its efficacy, most children with ADHD who are prescribed MPH have poor continuity of treatment for a variety of reasons, including forgetting to administer the medication and delays obtaining refills. In addition, it is an accepted clinical practice for physicians to omit MPH for periods of time, such as during the summer or on weekends (i.e., drug holidays). Since MPH discontinuation is considered to be benign, many clinicians do not employ any special procedures or inform families of any special precautions in regard to its cessation. However, increasing evidence suggests that the pharmacological effects of MPH cause lasting changes in brain neurochemistry that persist beyond medication discontinuation. Moreover, these neurobiological effects of discontinuation appear to have neurobehavioral consequences. There is a critical need to better understand the breadth and magnitude of the neurobehavioral effects caused by MPH discontinuation as well as to better understand the temporal trajectory of these deleterious effects. Hence, the primary goal of the proposed research is to conduct the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial specifically designed to study the negative effects of MPH discontinuation at multiple time points. 180 children diagnosed with ADHD will participate across two recruitment sites. After undergoing a 4-week MPH titration trial and 4-week MPH maintenance phase, participants will be randomized to either discontinue MPH (and receive placebo) OR remain on MPH for 4 weeks. Comprehensive multi-time point, multi-informant (parents, teachers, study staff) and multi-modal (behavior/mood/affect ratings scales, direct behavior observations, standardized testing) assessments will be used to assess a broad range of neurobehavioral outcomes. We will examine the magnitude and time course of effects of MPH discontinuation on behavioral as well as cognitive and academic functioning in children with ADHD. Furthermore, we will examine moderators of the adverse effects of MPH discontinuation on these outcomes to aid in the identification of those who are at increased risk.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 204
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 7 Years to 11 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. ADHD Diagnostic Status: Meets DSM-V criteria for ADHD, with Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating corresponding to at least "moderately ill."

2. Cognitive and Academic Functioning: Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of >80 as estimated by Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-4th Edition and scaled scores >80 on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-2nd edition Reading and Math subtests

3. Physical Health: Physical exam and ECG findings are judged to be normal for age and sex by study physician and/or medical consultant, and there is no co-existing condition for which MPH is contraindicated 4. School: Enrolled in a school setting rather than a home-school program. This ensures that we can obtain parent and teacher ratings from separate individuals for diagnosis and outcome assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Psychiatric Medications: Current or prior use of any medication for psychological/psychiatric problems

2. Behavioral Interventions: Current active participation in ADHD-related behavioral interventions, given that improvements due to these interventions may confound our group comparisons

3. Psychiatric or Neurobehavioral Conditions: Children with mania/hypomania, schizophrenia, or severe depressive disorder, as determined by the K-SADS, will be excluded since ADHD medications may not be an appropriate first line of treatment for children with these comorbid disorders

4. Organic Brain Injury: History of head trauma, neurological disorder (including epilepsy), or other disorder affecting brain function due to potential differences in neurophysiology of ADHD phenotype

5. Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Children with a personal history or family history of cardiovascular risk factors will be excluded, or given the option of participating in the study after obtaining an EKG and verification from a pediatric cardiologist regarding the safety of their participation in a trial of methylphenidate. In this case, families will be responsible for the costs of EKG and any necessary cardiologist evaluation

6. Pregnancy: The safety of MPH use during pregnancy has not been established

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• ADHD
• Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Intervention

Drug:
• OROS-Methylphenidate (MPH)
OROS-methylphenidate will be taken orally once daily at doses that have been approved for the study age group by the U.S. FDA.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Children's Hospital Medical Center	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Seattle Children's Hospital	Seattle	Washington

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati	Seattle Children's Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Parent ADHD Total Symptom Scores	Parent Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale Total Symptom Score, minimum=0, maximum=54, higher scores indicate more/worse ADHD symptoms	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12
Primary	Inhibitory Control Reaction Time Variability (SD of the Reaction Time)	Assessed via the Go/No-Go computerized measure of inhibitory control reaction time variability (with standard deviation of the reaction time being the indicator variability variability). Unit of measure is msec. Minimum is 0, Maximum is 500. Higher scores indicate more variability (higher standard deviation) in reaction time, indicating worse outcome (more characteristic of individuals with ADHD and less characteristic of typically developing individuals).	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
Primary	Math Computation - Number of Problems Completed Correctly	Math Computation Curriculum-Based Measure - Number of Problems Completed Correctly. Minimum=0, Maximum=600. Higher scores indicate improved/better performance	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
Primary	% Time on Task	Participants were videotaped while completing the 20-minute Analogue Math task. Their behavior was coded in 20-second intervals by trained coders who determined if the children were on-task or off-task during each interval. The amount of time coded as on-task was divided by the total amount of time and then multiplied by 100 to generate the % of time on task variable.	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12
Secondary	Barkley Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) Ratings	assessed via parent-completed Barkley Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Scale. Minimum=12, Max=48, higher scores indicate worse outcome.	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Secondary	Parent Ratings of Emotional Regulation	assessed via parent-completed Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC). Outcome assessed is ERC total mean score: minimum value=1, max value=4, higher scores indicate worse outcome	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Secondary	Spatial Working Memory	Spatial working memory was assessed via the Corsi Computerized Spatial Span Task, which requires the participant to reproduce a sequence of movements by tapping a series of blocks on a computer screen in the same order demonstrated by the examiner. Outcome of interest is total trials correct. Minimum score=0, max score=10. Higher scores indicate better performance.	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Secondary	Math Reasoning	Math reasoning was assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Math Concepts and Applications. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).	baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12
Secondary	Reading Comprehension	Reading Comprehension was assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Reading Comprehension. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).	baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Secondary	Written Expression	Assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Written Expression, with the measure assessing number of words written by the child after receiving a prompt. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score (# of words written) on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).	baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12