View clinical trials related to Acute Wounds.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a new Negative Pressure Wound Therapy dressing in the management of chronic and acute wounds.
Evaluation of the efficacy (wound epithelialization and time to closure) and tolerance (emergence and nature of adverse event) of the new URGO AWC_008 and URGO AWC_022 dressings in local management of acute and chronic wounds at risk of local infection or with clinical signs of local infection
This prospective clinical trial will compare the bacterial burden in the wound bed and on the periwound skin before and after mechanical debridement with EZ Debride using fluorescence imaging. After consenting, the ulcers of eligible subjects are measured, photographed and undergo the MolecuLight imaging procedure (MLiX). The ulcer is mechanically debridement with the EZ Debride device after which a second MLiX procedure is performed. The investigator will then compare the two images.
The study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial designed to compare the ability of NaOCl to NSS in the reduction of bacterial burden in nonhealing acute and chronic wounds.
The study objective is to improve the current and local standard antiseptic treatment by adjusting the antiseptic agent to the antimicrobial resistance testing result, accordingly. Currently, resistance testing will only be performed for the treatment with antibiotics.
Comparative evaluation of the propertieS of the contact LAyer dressing LOMatuell Pro® versus UrgoTul® in the management of acute wounds
This pilot study evaluates safety and performance of the Medical device, SoftOx Wound Irrigation Solution (SWIS), in a model for acute wounds.
The primary objective is to evaluate the handling of Mepitel® One when used in acute wounds in home care. Secondary objective is to evaluate the comfort, conformability, stay-on ability, pain at removal, transparency of dressing and adverse events.
The purpose of this pilot clinical study is to compare healing rates, pain levels, and incidence of wound complications including infection with the use of a moist PROCELLERA™ Antimicrobial Wound Dressing when compared to a standard dressing, Mepilex® Border Lite, following curettage and electrodesiccation of skin lesions.