Acute Pyelonephritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Adaptive Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iv or iv/po Omadacycline and iv/po Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Adults With Acute Pyelonephritis.
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (iv) or iv/per oral (po) omadacycline as compared to iv or iv/po levofloxacin in the treatment of female adults with acute pyelonephritis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 201 |
Est. completion date | July 24, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | June 26, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Female participants, age 18-65 years who have signed the informed consent form - Must have a qualifying acute pyelonephritis - Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment - Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug - Must be able to comply with all of the requirements of the study Exclusion Criteria: - Males - Symptoms of acute pyelonephritis present for longer 7 days prior to randomization - Infections that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days - Evidence of suspected non-renal source of infections, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection - Evidence of significant immunological disease - Evidence of liver impairment or disease - Evidence of unstable cardiac disease - Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis - Evidence of septic shock - Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to levofloxacin - Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days - Participants who are pregnant or nursing - Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Georgia | Site 201 | Tbilisi | |
Georgia | Site 202 | Tbilisi | |
Georgia | Site 203 | Tbilisi | |
Georgia | Site 204 | Tbilisi | |
Latvia | Site 301 | Daugavpils | |
Latvia | Site 304 | Liepaja | |
Latvia | Site 305 | Rezekne | |
Latvia | Site 302 | Riga | |
Latvia | Site 303 | Valmiera | |
Russian Federation | Site 409 | Krasnoyarsk | |
Russian Federation | Site 408 | Moscow | |
Russian Federation | Site 410 | Moscow | |
Russian Federation | Site 415 | Penza | |
Russian Federation | Site 405 | Rostov-on-Don | |
Russian Federation | Site 407 | Rostov-on-Don | |
Russian Federation | Site 401 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 402 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 403 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 404 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 406 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 411 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 412 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 414 | Saint Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Site 413 | Smolensk | |
Ukraine | Site 502 | Chernivtsi | |
Ukraine | Site 506 | Dnipro | |
Ukraine | Site 505 | Kharkiv | |
Ukraine | Site 503 | Kyiv | |
Ukraine | Site 504 | Kyiv | |
Ukraine | Site 501 | Lviv | |
Ukraine | Site 507 | Zaporizhzhia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc |
Georgia, Latvia, Russian Federation, Ukraine,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population) | Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed. | Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug). | |
Primary | Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population) | Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen. | Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug). | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population) | Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms. | Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug). | |
Primary | Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population) | Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline. | Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug). | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study drug or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the initiation of the study drug. | up to approximately 28 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05905055 -
P3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam and Aztreonam/Nacubactam Versus Best Available Therapy for Adults With Infection Due to Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacterales
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05060419 -
Meropenem-FL058 Phase 2 Study in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02537847 -
Sitafloxacin and Ertapenem Treatment for Acute Pyelonephritis Caused by Escherichia Coli
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02166476 -
Efficacy/Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Compared to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults With cUTI and AP
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06141395 -
NGS-Based Assay of Blood Samples of Sepsis Patients for Rapid Bacterial Identification
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05887908 -
Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam or Aztreonam/Nacubactam Compared to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Subjects With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections or Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02420366 -
Study of Cases of Serious Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04654507 -
Efficacy of Corticosteroids in Reducing Renal Scarring in Acute Pyelonephritis in Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04667195 -
Clinical Characteristics of Acutely Hospitalized Adults With Acute Pyelonephritis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04686318 -
Accuracy of Infection Biomarkers in the Investigation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pyelonephritis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03788967 -
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (SPR994) Compared to Intravenous Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05674032 -
Bacterial Metallophores in the Diagnosis of Acute Pyelonephritis
|
||
Completed |
NCT02168946 -
Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability of Vabomere Compared to Best Available Therapy in Treating Serious Infections in Adults
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01096849 -
A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03630081 -
Study of Cefepime-tazobactam (FEP-TAZ) in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03445195 -
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Sulbactam-ETX2514 in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02486627 -
A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03477422 -
CSE-1034 (Ceftriaxone+ Sulbactam+ EDTA) Compared to Meropenem in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTIs) Caused by ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacteria
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06059846 -
A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01928433 -
Finafloxacin for the Treatment of cUTI and/or Acute Pyelonephritis
|
Phase 2 |