Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03757234
Other study ID # PTK0796-AP-17202
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date November 19, 2018
Est. completion date July 24, 2019

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (iv) or iv/per oral (po) omadacycline as compared to iv or iv/po levofloxacin in the treatment of female adults with acute pyelonephritis.


Description:

This was a randomized (1:1:1:1:1), double-blind, double-dummy, adaptive designed, Phase 2 study. Based on review of the efficacy and microbiology data, the DMC modified the randomization algorithm, and no further participants were enrolled in the following treatment arms after May 2019: the omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv, omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv, and omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv arms. After this change, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv or levofloxacin arms.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 201
Est. completion date July 24, 2019
Est. primary completion date June 26, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Female participants, age 18-65 years who have signed the informed consent form

- Must have a qualifying acute pyelonephritis

- Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment

- Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

- Must be able to comply with all of the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Males

- Symptoms of acute pyelonephritis present for longer 7 days prior to randomization

- Infections that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days

- Evidence of suspected non-renal source of infections, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection

- Evidence of significant immunological disease

- Evidence of liver impairment or disease

- Evidence of unstable cardiac disease

- Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis

- Evidence of septic shock

- Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to levofloxacin

- Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days

- Participants who are pregnant or nursing

- Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Omadacycline
po tablets
Levofloxacin
iv solution/po tablets
Omadacycline
iv solution

Locations

Country Name City State
Georgia Site 201 Tbilisi
Georgia Site 202 Tbilisi
Georgia Site 203 Tbilisi
Georgia Site 204 Tbilisi
Latvia Site 301 Daugavpils
Latvia Site 304 Liepaja
Latvia Site 305 Rezekne
Latvia Site 302 Riga
Latvia Site 303 Valmiera
Russian Federation Site 409 Krasnoyarsk
Russian Federation Site 408 Moscow
Russian Federation Site 410 Moscow
Russian Federation Site 415 Penza
Russian Federation Site 405 Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation Site 407 Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation Site 401 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 402 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 403 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 404 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 406 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 411 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 412 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 414 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Site 413 Smolensk
Ukraine Site 502 Chernivtsi
Ukraine Site 506 Dnipro
Ukraine Site 505 Kharkiv
Ukraine Site 503 Kyiv
Ukraine Site 504 Kyiv
Ukraine Site 501 Lviv
Ukraine Site 507 Zaporizhzhia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Georgia,  Latvia,  Russian Federation,  Ukraine, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population) Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed. Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Primary Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population) Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen. Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Primary Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population) Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms. Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Primary Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population) Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline. Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Secondary Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study drug or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the initiation of the study drug. up to approximately 28 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05905055 - P3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam and Aztreonam/Nacubactam Versus Best Available Therapy for Adults With Infection Due to Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacterales Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05060419 - Meropenem-FL058 Phase 2 Study in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02537847 - Sitafloxacin and Ertapenem Treatment for Acute Pyelonephritis Caused by Escherichia Coli Phase 2
Completed NCT02166476 - Efficacy/Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Compared to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults With cUTI and AP Phase 3
Completed NCT06141395 - NGS-Based Assay of Blood Samples of Sepsis Patients for Rapid Bacterial Identification
Recruiting NCT05887908 - Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam or Aztreonam/Nacubactam Compared to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Subjects With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections or Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis Phase 3
Completed NCT02420366 - Study of Cases of Serious Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Recruiting NCT04654507 - Efficacy of Corticosteroids in Reducing Renal Scarring in Acute Pyelonephritis in Children Phase 3
Completed NCT04667195 - Clinical Characteristics of Acutely Hospitalized Adults With Acute Pyelonephritis
Completed NCT04686318 - Accuracy of Infection Biomarkers in the Investigation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pyelonephritis
Completed NCT03788967 - Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (SPR994) Compared to Intravenous Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05674032 - Bacterial Metallophores in the Diagnosis of Acute Pyelonephritis
Completed NCT02168946 - Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability of Vabomere Compared to Best Available Therapy in Treating Serious Infections in Adults Phase 3
Completed NCT01096849 - A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT03630081 - Study of Cefepime-tazobactam (FEP-TAZ) in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) Phase 3
Completed NCT03445195 - Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Sulbactam-ETX2514 in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Phase 2
Completed NCT02486627 - A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) Phase 3
Completed NCT03477422 - CSE-1034 (Ceftriaxone+ Sulbactam+ EDTA) Compared to Meropenem in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTIs) Caused by ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacteria Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06059846 - A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) Phase 3
Completed NCT01928433 - Finafloxacin for the Treatment of cUTI and/or Acute Pyelonephritis Phase 2