PrEveNtion of Biliary Events After Acute Pancreatitis In NonSUrgicaL pAtients: PENINSULA Trial

Acute Pancreatitis Clinical Trial

— PENINSULA  

Official title:

PrEveNtion of Biliary Events After Acute Pancreatitis in NonSUrgicaL pAtients. Sphincterotomy vs Conservative Treatment. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial: PENINSULA Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06409741
• Other study ID #: CEIm Ref: 2023-139 (2023-414)
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 2024
• Est. completion date: July 2027

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
• Contact: José Ramón Aparicio, MD
• Phone: (0034)965933468
• Email: japariciot[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common condition and its main etiology is biliary. Cholecystectomy is the standard preventive treatment for recurrence of AP after admission. However, due to an increasingly older population and increased patient comorbidity, it is not always a possible option these days. If cholecystectomy is not performed, there is a significant risk for a recurrence of a biliopancreatic event (pancreatitis, biliary colic, choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis or cholangitis) of around 50% in the first year. This can lead to further episodes of pain, patient readmissions, and a reduced quality of life. Additionally, frequent readmissions can create a high cost burden on the health system. Currently, certain clinical guidelines propose biliary sphincterotomy as an alternative for patients in whom surgery is not feasible. However, this recommendation is based on retrospective studies with small sample size and the adherence to this recommendation is very low (12-23%).

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the recurrence of biliopancreatic events in the first year after admission for an acute biliary pancreatitis episode in patients that are not suitable for surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does biliary sphincterotomy prevent biliopancreatic event recurrence in non surgical patients after an episode of biliary acute pancreatitis?

Researchers will compare biliary sphincterotomy vs conservative treatment to see if there is a reduction in biliopancreatic events during the first year after admission for acute pancreatitis in non surgical patients.

Participants will be randomized to conservative treatment or biliary sphincterotomy and will be followed up for one year at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months to evaluate recurrence of BPE, readmissions, quality of life and mortality. Security of the technique will also be assessed in this specific population.

Description:

Our working hypothesis is that endoscopic treatment with biliary sphincterotomy will reduce the number of biliopancreatic events compared to conservative treatment in patients with non-operable biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) due to a high surgical risk or in those patients who refuse surgery.

The primary aim is to assess the recurrence of the combined variable of biliopancreatic events (BPE) (biliary colic, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, acute cholecystitis or AP) of the endoscopic sphincterotomy strategy during the follow-up time after diagnosis of AP of biliary origin in inoperable patients with respect to conservative treatment.

This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, nationwide, intention-to-treat clinical trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the two treatment groups stratified by center and AP severity.

Centers considered to participate as collaborators centers will need to have an endoscopy unit with ERCP availability that perform more than 150 ERCPs/year, and endoscopists trained in this technique. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria is specified in a specific section of the protocol.

For the inclusion of patients, after diagnosis of biliary AP (BAP), and having ruled cholecystectomy as a possibility for the patient because of high surgical risk (after evaluation by surgery or anesthesia) or patient's refusal to undergo cholecystectomy, the absence of choledocholithiasis will be confirmed by MRCP or EUS.

If the patient fulfills these requirements, in addition to all the previous inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and agrees to participate in the study and signs the informed consent the patient will be included and randomized.

This randomization will be carried out in each of the collaborating centers and the patient will be assigned to a treatment group following the random assignment method.

The randomization of patients to each of the treatment groups will be carried out centrally by the REDCap software; REDCap is a program that offers an online electronic data collection notebook. It will be stratified by center and by severity of BAP (mild, moderate or severe according to the Revised Atlanta Classification).

Patients will be randomized to receive ERCP biliary sphincterotomy or conservative management. 63 patients will be allocated to each group. An interim safety analysis is proposed, which will be evaluated by an independent committee of 3 persons, with experience in complications associated with ERCP and knowledge of biliopancreatic pathology, once 50% of the sample reaches 6 months of follow-up. In the event that in this first analysis the risks of treatment outweigh the benefits, according to the decision of the safety committee, the study could be stopped. Also, in the event that at this point there are statistically significant differences in favor of treatment by biliary sphincterotomy with respect to the primary outcome, recruitment can be stopped and the study stopped early.

In the group assigned to receive endoscopic treatment, ERCP for biliary sphincterotomy will be performed during the index admission for acute pancreatitis, prior to discharge or up till one month from discharge.

The procedure will be performed after at least 6 hours of fasting during the index admission, by endoscopists in charge of performing ERCP as usual in the collaborating centers under sedation controlled by endoscopists or anesthesia according to the usual practice of the Endoscopy Unit of each collaborating center.

For ERCP biliary cannulation, the usual techniques available in each center will be used, including advanced cannulation techniques if necessary. The type of papilla, cannulation attempts, time to biliary cannulation and the technique(s) used will be recorded. Possible adverse effects will be recorded. If biliary cannulation is not possible, a new ERCP attempt will be performed within a maximum of one month. If biliary cannulation is still not achieved, it will be counted as a technical failure, maintaining the established clinical follow-up.

The inhospital management of patients with AP in the conservative treatment group, before and after randomization, will be under the care of their responsible physicians on the hospitalization wart at the corresponding collaboration center who will follow the management recommended by the clinical guidelines. Their discharge will be decided by their regular physician.

Periodic follow-up contacts will be made: at one month, at 6 months and at one year. Contacts may be made by face-to-face or telematic visits after consultation with the patient, especially if the patient is institutionalized or has severe mobility problems.

In these contacts, the following will be performed:

• Record of complications associated with the treatment received and record of BPE developed since the last visit (especially the presence of biliary colic that did not require admission or evaluation in the emergency department). An interview will be conducted aimed at collecting the presence of BPE that did not require admission (such as biliary colic or related pain), recording the type and date of onset. The digital medical record will also be reviewed to record admissions and assessments by the emergency department related or unrelated to BPE and also to assess mortality.

• EORTQ30 quality of life questionnaire will be conducted in every visit.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 126
• Est. completion date: July 2027
• Est. primary completion date: July 2027
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient older than 18 years old.

• Definitive diagnosis of acute pancreatitis according to the presence of two out of three criteria from the Revised Atlanta Classification. At least 2 criteria: A) Typical pain, B) Amylase or lipase =x3 normal limit, C) Imaging evidence compatible with acute pancreatitis).

• Biliary etiology: (any imaging test that describes gallbladder lithiasis/microlithiasis or biliary sludge).

• Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is required without evidence of choledocholithiasis.

• Surgical decision of inoperable patient (if meets one or more of the following criteria: age = 80 years, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) III or more, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5 and/or Karnofsky < 50 or patient's decision not to undergo surgery. Patient must have been evaluated by general surgery or anesthesia.

• Signature of the informed consent for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient refusal to participate in the study.

• Active ethylism greater than or equal to 5 drinking units per day in men and 3 in women or strong clinical suspicion of clinically significant ethylism that could be a cause of their AP.

• Hypertriglyceridemia greater than 400 mg/dl at admission or history of poorly controlled hypertriglyceridemia.

• Chronic pancreatitis: pancreatic calcifications in body or Wirsung on imaging or Wirsung = 4 mm

• Biliary condition requiring sphincterotomy during index admission (cholangitis or symptomatic choledocholithiasis) or previous biliary sphincterotomy.

• Previous cholecystectomy

• Actual use of ursodeoxycholic acid

• Gastrointestinal tract anatomy altered by previous hepatobiliary or upper gastrointestinal surgery.

• Inability to tolerate endoscopy sedation, perforation of the digestive tract or other contraindication to endoscopy.

• Coagulopathy with uncorrectable International Normalized Ratio > 1.5 or uncorrectable thrombocytopenia < 50000/mm3.

• Other concomitant diagnoses on admission (liver abscesses, biliopancreatic neoplasia, acute cholecystitis).

• Hemodynamic instability.

• Baseline ECOG =4

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Pancreatitis
• Acute Pancreatitis Due to Gallstones
• Gallstones
• Pancreatitis

Intervention

Procedure:
• Biliary sphincterotomy
ERCP for biliary sphincterotomy will be performed during index admission for acute pancreatitis, prior to discharge or up till one month from discharge. The procedure will be performed after at least 6 hours of fasting during the index admission, by endoscopists in charge of performing ERCP as usual in the collaborating centers under sedation controlled by endoscopists or anesthesia according to the usual practice of the Endoscopy Unit of each collaborating center. For ERCP biliary cannulation, the usual techniques available in each center will be used, including advanced cannulation techniques if necessary. If biliary cannulation is not possible, a new ERCP attempt will be performed within a maximum of one month. If biliary cannulation is still not achieved, it will be it will be counted as a technical failure, maintaining the established clinical follow-up.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis	Alicante
Spain	Hospital Universitaria Reina Sofía	Córdoba	Cordoba
Spain	Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal	Madrid
Spain	Hospital Clinico Universitairo	Valencia
Spain	Hospital Universitario Río Hortega	Valladolid

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante	Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Hospital del Río Hortega, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Biliopancreatic events (BPE)	The primary aim is to assess the recurrence of the combined variable of biliopancreatic events (biliary colic, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, acute cholecystitis or AP) of the endoscopic sphincterotomy strategy during the follow-up time after diagnosis of AP of biliary origin in inoperable patients with respect to conservative treatment.	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Time to recurrence of BPE	Time in days to recurrence of biliopancreatic events between both groups	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Recurrence of each of the variables that make up the combined variable BPE separately	To assess the recurrence of each of the variables that make up the combined variable BPE separately and compare them between groups (AP, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis, biliary colic).	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Technical success of biliary sphincterotomy	Technical success will be defined as the achievement of biliary sphincterotomy defined by the endoscopist performing the procedure.	From enrollment until one month after
Secondary	Sphincterotomy related adverse events	To describe the complications associated with sphincterotomy and the management of these adverse events of patients included in the study with the AGREE scale of endoscopic adverse events (Classification of Adverse events GastRointEstinal Endoscopy). This classification of adverse events ranges from 0 (no adverse events) until 5 (death) due to complications related to the procedure.	From enrollment until one month after
Secondary	Emergency room visits (BPE related)	Number of visits to the emergency room due to a BPE	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Admission rate (BPE related)	To evaluate differences between admission rate in hospital between both groups related to BPE	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Admission rate (not BPE related)	Number of admissions (not directly associated to BPE) in hospital and comparison between both groups	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Emergency room visits (not BPE related)	Number of emergency room visits that do not require admission and are not specifically related to BPE	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Mortality at 30 days	Mortality at 30 days and comparison between both groups	From enrollment until one month after
Secondary	Hospital readmission at 30 days	Hospital admission at day 30 due to EBP or not related to EBP and comparison between both groups	From enrollment until one month after
Secondary	Mortality at one year	Evaluation of mortality at one year and comparison between both groups	From enrollment until 12 months after
Secondary	Index admission duration	Days of index admission due to AP and comparison between both groups	From enrollment until one month after
Secondary	Quality of life during follow-up	Quality of life will be assessed at every visit (1 month, 6 months and 12 months) with EORTC ( European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ) Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 and groups will be compared.The questionnaire is structured in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, activities of daily living, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea, vomiting), 1 global health status scale and, finally, 6 independent items (dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, constipation, diarrhea and economic impact). Values between 1 and 4 (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a lot, 4: a lot) are assigned according to the patient's responses to the item, only items 29 and 30 are evaluated with scores from 1 to 7 (1: very bad, 7: excellent). The scores obtained are standardized and a score between 0 and 100 is obtained.	From enrollment until 12 months after