View clinical trials related to Acute Pancreatitis.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the possible effects of tributyrin supplementation in patients with a first episode of acute pancreatitis. The main question it aims to answer is: • The effect of oral tributyrin supplementation on the plasma endotoxin level Participants will be randomized between two groups: intervention and control group. They will receive: - three times daily 4grams of micro-encapsulated granules of tributyrin, and the control group three times daily 4 grams of micro-encapsulated sunflower oil (i.e. placebo), for a total of 14 days In total 92 adult patients with a first episode of acute pancreatitis will be included.
The MINERVA (Machine learnINg for the rElapse Risk eValuation in Acute biliary pancreatitis) project stems from the need in the clinical practice of taking an operational decision in patients that are admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. In particular, the MINERVA prospective cohort study aims to develop a predictive score that allows to assess the risk of hospital readmission for patients diagnosed with mild biliary acute pancreatitis using Machine Learning and artificial intelligence. The objectives of the MINERVA study are to: 1. Propose a novel methodology for the assessment of the risk of relapse in patients with mild biliary acute pancreatitis who did not undergo early cholecystectomy (within 3 to 7 days from hospital admission); 2. Propose a Machine Learning predictive model using a Deep Learning architecture applied to easily collectable data; 3. Validate the MINERVA score on an extensive, multicentric, prospective cohort; 4. Allow national and international clinicians, medical staff, researchers and the general audience to freely and easily access the MINERVA score computation and use it in their daily clinical practice. The MINERVA score model will be developed on a retrospective cohort of patients (MANCTRA-1, already registered in ClinicalTrials.gov) and will be validated on a novel prospective multicentric cohort. After validation, the MINERVA score will be free and easy to compute instantly for all medical staff; it will be accessible at any time on the MINERVA website and web app, and will provide an immediate and reliable result that can be a clear indication for the best treatment pathway for the clinician and for the patient.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare outcomes for interval or early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - To establish whether there is a difference in surgical outcomes comparing patients diagnosed with severe or moderately severe pancreatitis on which early cholecystectomy was performed versus performing interval cholecystectomy. - The primary endpoint will be to evaluate major complications, defined as a Clavien-Dindo score greater than or equal to III/V. - Secondary endpoints include evaluating minor complications (defined as a Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), biliary disease recurrence, mortality, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative admittance into an intensive care unit. Participants will be randomly assigned to either group: early cholecystectomy during the pancreatitis hospitalization or interval cholecystectomy scheduled 4 weeks after clinical resolution of pancreatitis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the safety and effectiveness of a single dose of RABI-767 given by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided peripancreatic injection in participants with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. The main question the study aims to answer is: • Is a single-dose of RABI-767 given by EUS-guided peripancreatic injection safe in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. The study also aims to answer: • Is a single-dose of RABI-767 given by EUS-guided peripancreatic injection effective in treating patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. Study participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive a single dose of RABI-767 plus supportive care or supportive care only. The study sponsor will compare safety and efficacy data collected from participants who receive RABI-767 to participants who receive supportive care only to test if RABI-767 is safe and effective.
Nausea and vomiting are one of the most common symptoms in acute pancreatitis. In addition to pharmacological methods for nausea and vomiting, non-pharmacological methods can also be used. Among these, anticipatory nausea and vomiting can be prevented by behaviors aimed at distracting attention. This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on the severity of nausea-vomiting and thirst in patients with acute pancreatitis. The study will be conducted with a total of 60 patients, 30 intervention and 30 control. Patients in the intervention group will chew xylitol gum five times a day for three days. The patients' thirst and nausea and vomiting conditions will be examined.
Strategies for invasive intervention in acute pancreatitis include sequential or combined use of multiple drainage and debridement modalities. The more widely used is the step-up approach, which requires an individualized and multidisciplinary (internal medicine, interventional radiology, endoscopy, surgery, critical care medicine, and nutritionists) approach. The available evidence from randomized controlled studies is from highly selected subject populations, and it is unclear whether the results can be applied to complex clinical situations in real clinics, and the optimal strategy for drainage of peripancreatic lesions in different patients still needs to be evaluated in the real world. This study intends to establish a prospective single-center cohort for real-world analysis to collect comprehensive clinic information and clinical outcomes, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of existing intervention strategies, especially the timing and modality of interventions, in real-world clinical practice, and to explore the key factors affecting patient prognosis.
The MoSAIC study is a prospective, observational study designed to develop an early prediction tool for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and define a distinct immunologic profile compared to moderate acute pancreatitis (MAP). The aims are to validate a new multi-cytokine panel for early prediction of SAP and to identify the specific immune cells that correspond with cytokine signatures in early acute pancreatitis to characterize the immune pathways driving the development of SAP. Participants will provide blood samples and complete patient surveys and interviews within 36 hours of hospital presentation, at 48 hours, and hospital day 7 (if admitted). Data on hospital stay, medical history, clinical course, and severity of disease will be collected.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a disease characterized by dysfunction of pancreatic acinar cells, improper activation of trypsin, and subsequent destruction of pancreatic self-defense mechanisms, further exacerbating injury and damage of pancreatic cells. It is a rapidly developing inflammatory process of the pancreas, and the most common reasons are alcohol and gallstones.
The goal of this observational retrospective cohort study in combination with an expert study is to assess the clinical relevance and management of Lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS)-occlusion and LAMS-occlusion-related complications as well as the influence of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on LAMS-occlusion. The main questions this study aims to answer are: - the individual management of LAMS-occlusion and LAMS-occlusion-related complications in the respective centers participating in the study. - if there is an association between PPI-intake and LAMS-occlusion. Participants for the retrospective cohort study will be enrolled retrospectively among European centers with expertise in pancreatology. The expert survey will be distributed European-wide to centers with special expertise in pancreatology.
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory disease of variable severity. Mild cases have an uncomplicated clinical course, but local and systemic complications occur in one-third of patients and are associated with a longer hospital stay, increased morbidity, increased hospital costs, and increased risk of death. Some evidence suggests that fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) may have an anti-inflammatory effect on AP when compared to normal saline (NS), and may be associated with a decrease in severity, but randomized controlled trials showed conflicting results. The WATERLAND trial has been designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluid resuscitation using LR as compared with NS in patients with AP. Methods: The WATERLAND trial is an international multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LR versus NS-based moderate fluid resuscitation. The primary outcome will be moderately severe to severe AP, according to the revision of the Atlanta classification. The primary safety outcome will be a composite variable involving any of the following: fluid overload, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, hypercalcemia, or acidosis. A total sample of 720 patients, 360 in the LR group and 360 in the NS group will achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of 10%, assuming that the frequency of moderately severe to severe AP in LR group will be 17%. The frequency in the NS group is assumed to be 27% under the null hypothesis and 17% under the alternative hypothesis. The test statistic used is the two-sided Z test with pooled variance set at a 0.05 significance level.