View clinical trials related to Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.
Filter by:Investigator proposed to apply the new dosage form of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposomes to the clinical treatment of AML, while combining with cytarabine and azacitidine to form the MA+AZA treatment regimen(Mitoxantrone liposome +Ara-Cytarabine+Azacitidine), which would provide an optimal induction treatment regimen for patients with primary AML by comparing with the traditional chemotherapy regimen, DA+AZA (Daunorubicin+Ara-Cytarabine+Azacitidine).
A Randomized, Single Oral Dose, Open Label, Two Treatment, Crossover study to investigate the bioequivalence of the Test Product Azacitidine 300 mg Film coated tablets relative to Reference Product Onureg® 300 mg Film Coated Tablets in adult patients with AML under fasting conditions
This is a single group, Phase 1, single-arm, dose escalation study to determine the candidate dose(s), and evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of SAR445419 administered after fludarabine and cytarabine conditioning for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). Adult participants with R/R AML will be eligible for treatment. The study is intended to assess the candidate dose(s) by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) from start of chemotherapy until 28 days after the first administration of SAR445419. The duration of the study for a participant will include: - Screening period up to 21 days prior to initiating chemotherapy, - Treatment period of 5 days chemotherapy followed by SAR445419 administered for 2 weeks and end of treatment visit 56 days after first SAR445419 administration, - Survival follow-up period up to 1 year after the last participant has started treatment with SAR445419.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and clinical activity of the combination S64315 with azacitidine in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
Treatment options for older adults with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) and Myelodysplasia (MDS) are limited. Although stem cell transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments it is associated with severe side effects which have until recently prevented its use in older adults. In the last decade the use of reduced intensity transplants has allowed the extension of the potentially curative effect of transplantation to older patients in whom it was previously precluded. Although a major advance such transplants are associated with a high risk of disease relapse particularly in patients with high risk disease. This study will evaluate new transplant strategies with the aim of improving the outcome of patients with AML and high risk MDS after stem cell transplantation. Three approaches to improve transplant outcome will be studied: 1. Comparing the new pre-transplant consolidation therapy vyxeos with the standard consolidation therapy (Randomisation 1 is now closed to recruitment). 2. Comparing new conditioning therapies in patients under the age of 55 years 3. Comparing new conditioning therapies in patients aged 55 and over All patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years.
This is a Phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of UCART123 administered intravenously to patients with newly diagnosed CD123 positive adverse genetic risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) defined in the ELN adverse genetic risk group (2017). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of multiple infusions of UCART123 and to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety profile, tolerability and the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of the combination S64315 with venetoclax in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.
This is a Phase I/II clinical study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and schedule, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AZD2811 monotherapy or with combination agent(s) in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) participants or treatment-naïve AML participants not eligible for intensive induction therapy. In addition, the study will explore the potential clinical activity by assessing anti-tumour activity in participants. The study was terminated early as a result of AstraZeneca's strategic review across the AZD2811 programme. Part A data were collected for initial cohorts; the MTD/recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) dose and schedule of AZD2811 monotherapy or with combination agents were not determined. Part B of the study was not initiated
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a haematological malignant disease characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation of immature hematopoietic cells. Over the last two decades, clinical trials have demonstrated an improved response rate in younger adult AML. Aggressive induction plus more potent intensification programs with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus stem cell transplantation (SCT) has improved treatment results. Advances in understanding disease biology, improvements in induction and consolidation program, and better supportive care have also all contributed. A number of clinical and laboratory characteristics influence the response to treatment and, thus, the survival of patients with AML. Among them, cytogenetic at diagnosis represents the most important prognostic variable. However, other factors may have a prognostic value and may influence patient's outcome. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia are cardinal manifestations of AML. Over the last decades, it has become apparent that the frequency of allogeneic blood transfusions can modify host immunity and clinical outcomes. Anaemia has long been recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), which represents a pre-leukemic disease. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need was identified as a strong and independent risk factor for survival in MDS, for which the presence and severity of anaemia were attributed to a clonally advanced and biologically more aggressive disease. Based on these data, the investigators retrospectively assessed the prognostic value of RBC and platelet transfusions at the time of diagnosis and the frequency of transfusions during the first induction course of chemotherapy in a large unselected group of patients with previously untreated AML.
The main purpose of this study is : 1. To establish which number of doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (up to a maximum of 3 doses) is tolerated and can be safety delivered in combination with cytarabine plus mitoxantrone or liposomal daunorubicin in induction 2. To compare mitoxantrone (anthracenedione) & cytarabine with liposomal daunorubicin (anthracycline) & cytarabine as induction therapy. (Randomisation 1 (R1) closed early to recruitment on 8th September 2017, due to liposomal daunorubicin manufacturing issues resulting in unavailability of the drug.) 3. To compare a single dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin with the optimum tolerated number of doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (identified by the dose-finding study) when combined with induction chemotherapy. 4. To compare two consolidation regimens: high dose cytarabine (HD Ara-C) and fludarabine & cytarabine (FLA) in standard risk patients. 5. To compare the toxicity and effectiveness of two haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) conditioning regimens of different intensity: conventional myeloablative conditioning (MAC) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine/busulfan.