Clinical Trials Logo

Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05499611 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Impact of Optical Genome Mapping in Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

COALA
Start date: January 27, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A retrospective study using a new technology will be performed: the Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) samples stored at the CRB-Cancer of the Bordeaux University Hospital and annotated in the DATAML clinical database. The main objective is to estimate the proportion of AML patients for whom OGM detects at least one additional abnormality compared to conventional techniques. This study will constitute an important step in the validation of COA as a reference technique for cytogenetic analysis in AML, replacing the classical techniques, and could also constitute a first argument for redesigning the prognostic classification of AML.

NCT ID: NCT01966497 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Observational Study of Patients Older Than 60 Years With Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

ALFA1200
Start date: November 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The main objective of this observational survey is to estimate the incidence, the typology, and the evolution of patients with acute myelobalstic leukemia, aged more than 60 years old. In this age group (aged more than 60y), three groups of patients with very different response rates and late outcome can be delineated with specific standard chemotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT01296178 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

PETHEMA-LMA10: Treatment of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML) in Patients Less Than or Equal to 65 Years

Start date: December 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Advances in the biological characterization of AML can now make a proper estimate of the risk of recurrence and likelihood of survival of different groups of patients according to the expression of different disease parameters. Karyotype, the molecular alterations affecting genes FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA, minimal residual disease by flow cytometry and response to first induction cycle are variables that must be taken into consideration when planning the treatment of first line from a patient with AML. This breakthrough in the field of biology has not resulted yet in the development of new drugs really effective in the treatment of AML. Therefore, the core of the treatment continue to rely on the use of traditional chemotherapy combined or not with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell. Both treatments differ in their antileukemic efficacy, higher in aloTPH, as well as their toxicity and procedure-related mortality, increased also in the aloTPH. These aspects should be added that most candidates aloTPH patients lack an HLA identical sibling donor forcing the search for alternative sources and hematopoietic stem cell donors. These transplants alternative, but are not committed to their antileukemic efficacy, it does have implied a greater toxicity. Therefore, the ultimate effectiveness of these procedures depends largely on the proper selection of candidates for the same. While there is broad agreement in terms of induction chemotherapy using a combination of cytarabine with anthracycline, the choice of chemotherapy regimen is controversial postremisión today. In the poor prognosis of itself involve the LMA, patients classified as "favorable group" are acceptable disease-free survival with consolidation schemes involving high-dose cytarabine. For other patients appear to be inappropriate to combine cytarabine with an anthracycline, at least one cycle of consolidation, and raise the option of allogeneic different depending on prognostic markers