Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05811845 |
Other study ID # |
57/22 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 30, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2024 |
Source |
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo |
Contact |
Marco Rabusin, MD |
Phone |
+390403785111 |
Email |
marco.rabusin[@]burlo.trieste.it |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy in children
(<18 years). The success of pediatric ALL therapy is remarkable but important challenges
still need to be faced, including cure rates in specific patients' subsets (e.g.: adolescents
and relapsed patients), and short- and long-term chemotherapy-related toxicities. The
therapeutic scheme of the Associazione Italiana Emato-oncologia pediatrica (AIEOP) ALL
protocols consists in a more intensive and toxic earlier phase (to induce and consolidate
remission, about 6 months), followed by a prolonged period of immunosuppression (achieved by
self- or parent-administered daily mercaptopurine (MP) and weekly methotrexate (MTX) per os).
It is now well established that the length of the maintenance phase (up to 24 months after
diagnosis) is as necessary as the early remission induction for sustained event-free survival
(EFS). Both MP and MTX can lead to potentially serious complications, including potentially
life-threatening myelosuppression and infections. To exert its therapeutic effect, MP
requires an intracellular enzymatic conversion into active thionucleotides (TGN) and is thus
susceptible to intra- and inter-individual variations in efficacy and toxicity. Patients
carrying variants in TPMT and NUTD15 genes are at risk of adverse effects when treated with
standard MP doses: these patients are identifiable by pre-emptive genotyping. Recent studies
demonstrated that an adequate and constant MP exposure during maintenance is associated with
higher therapeutic success. Prescribed MP doses are often changed by physicians to target a
white blood cell count (WBC) range of 2.0-3.0 × 109/L during maintenance. In the AIEOP ALL
2009 protocol, patients with lower mean TGN exposure during maintenance showed a trend
towards a higher risk of relapse compared to others. Similarly, patients with higher
intra-individual variability in TGN over time showed a trend towards a worse outcome. Daily
compliance to prescribed MP over time is a challenging issue for patients and may result in
less effective therapy. The high intra-individual variability in exposure due to the frequent
dose adjustments and the potential lack of patients' adherence to oral MP therapy over time
might contribute to the risk of relapse. The aim of this study is to assess through
therapeutic drug monitoring of MP if patients' exposure during maintenance is adequate and
constant.
Description:
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy in children
(<18 years). The success of pediatric ALL therapy is remarkable (5 years survival ~90%).
However, important challenges still need to be faced, including cure rates in specific
patients' subsets (e.g.: adolescents and relapsed patients, 5 years survival ~60-70% and
~40-50%, respectively), and short- and long-term chemotherapy-related toxicities. The
therapeutic scheme of the Associazione Italiana Emato-oncologia pediatrica (AIEOP) ALL
protocols consists in a more intensive and toxic earlier phase (to induce and consolidate
remission, ~ 6 months), followed by a prolonged period of immunosuppression (achieved by
self- or parent-administered daily mercaptopurine (MP) and weekly methotrexate (MTX) per os).
It is now well established that the length of the maintenance phase (up to 24 months after
diagnosis) is as necessary as the early remission induction for sustained event-free survival
(EFS). Ideally, the combination of antimetabolites MP and MTX is safe enough to provide the
required antileukemic effects with minimal adverse events. However, both drugs can lead to
potentially serious complications, including potentially life-threatening myelosuppression
and infections. To exert its therapeutic effect, MP requires an intracellular enzymatic
conversion into active thionucleotides (TGN) and is thus susceptible to intra- and
inter-individual variations in efficacy and toxicity. In particular, patients carrying
variants in TPMT and NUTD15 genes are at risk of adverse effects when treated with standard
MP doses: these patients are identifiable by pre-emptive genotyping, and
pharmacogenetic-based dose adjustment guidelines are already available. Recent studies of the
Children's Oncology Group (COG) and of the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and
Oncology (NOPHO) demonstrated that an adequate and constant MP exposure during maintenance is
associated with higher therapeutic success. Prescribed MP doses are often changed by
physicians to target a white blood cell count (WBC) range of 2.0-3.0 × 109/L during
maintenance. In the AIEOP ALL 2009 protocol, patients with lower mean TGN exposure during
maintenance (below median cut-off of 272.44 pmol/10x108 RBC) showed a trend towards a higher
risk of relapse compared to others (11.5% vs 5.5%, respectively). Similarly, patients with
higher intra-individual variability in TGN over time (above the 75th percentile of the
coefficient of variation (CV)) showed a trend towards a worse outcome (10.3% vs 4.8%). These
preliminary data were obtained in 265 ALL patients (age: median (interquartile range): 4.82
(3.03-8.53) years; 58.5% male; follow up from maintenance beginning: 1338 (1377-4162) days;
27 relapsed, TGN measured in 391 blood samples of 209 patients). Daily compliance to
prescribed MP over time is a challenging issue for patients and may result in less effective
therapy: indeed, the recent use of an electronic device - the medication bottle cap opening
(MEMS)- revealed that patients' self-reported MP intake overestimates true intake, in
particular in some sociodemographic groups. Adherence is generally poorer in adolescents
compared to younger children, likely because drug administration may no more be under strict
parents' supervision: this lower compliance can in part contribute to the survival disparity
observed between the two age groups. Thus, the high intra-individual variability in exposure
due to the frequent dose adjustments and the potential lack of patients' adherence to oral MP
therapy over time might contribute to the risk of relapse.