Acute Cholecystitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Upfront Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gallbladder Drainage (EUS-GBD) Versus Standard Protocol (Antibiotics First) for Mild to Moderate Acute Cholecystitis in Patients Who Are Very-high-risk for Cholecystectomy: A Randomized-controlled Trial.
Objectives Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients who are at high-risk for surgery. Whether upfront Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is advantageous over antibiotics first for mild acute cholecystitis is uncertain. Hypothesis to be tested The aim is to compare EUS-GBD versus standard protocol (antibiotics first) as a definitive treatment, in very high-risk patients suffering from mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. We hypothesize that EUS-GBD can reduce the 1-year risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis. Design and subjects This is an international randomised controlled study including consecutive patients suffering from acute cholecystitis that are very high-risk for cholecystectomy. The patients would be randomized to receive EUS-GBD or antibiotics first. Interventions: EUS-GBD versus antibiotics Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is the rate of recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. Other outcomes include technical and clinical success, post-procedural pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events, re-admissions, re-interventions, quality of life and cost analysis. Data analysis All outcomes would be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test will be used to compare differences in recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. A health economic analysis will also be performed. Assuming a 17.1% difference in recurrent acute cholecystitis rates, a 2-sided P value of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a 10% dropout rate, 110 patients is required. Expected results The findings of this study can help establish the role of EUS-GBD in management of high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis over antibiotics alone and Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 110 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Consecutive patients aged = 18 years old 2. Suffering from grade 1 or 2 acute calculous cholecystitis* 3. At very high-risk for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions** or elderly patients suffering from acute cholecystitis but refused operations Exclusion Criteria: Patients with the following conditions are excluded from the study: - Pregnancy - Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments - Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder - Grade III acute cholecystitis33 - Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal) - Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum - Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices - Abnormal coagulation: International normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 and/or platelets < 50.000/mm3 - Previous drainage of the gallbladder - Patients suffering acute cholecystitis due to malignant cystic duct obstruction - Patients with life expectancy of less than 3 years |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Chinese University of Hong Kong |
Hong Kong,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | 1-year recurrent acute cholecystitis rate | recurrent acute cholecystitis rate in 1 year | 1-year | |
Secondary | Technical success | Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the gallbladder by placement of a drainage tube or maintenance of good drainage. | 1-year | |
Secondary | Daily post-procedural pain scores for the first 7 days | Pain assessment would be performed using the visual-analogue scale (1 to 100) on post-procedural days 1 to 7. | 7 days | |
Secondary | Type and dosage of analgesic required | Type and the dosage of the analgesic required after procedure/administered of antibiotics would be recorded. | an average of 7 days | |
Secondary | Adverse events | Any adverse events occured in 1 year will be recorded | 1-year | |
Secondary | Total number of unplanned readmissions related to acute cholecystitis and reinterventions | The total number and the reason of any unplanned readmissions related to acute cholecystitis and reinterventions in 1 year will be recorded. | 1-year | |
Secondary | Cost-effectiveness measurement | All costs in the antibiotics first arm would be recorded: the cost of using antibiotics (dose, frequency, duration), the cost of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage (PT-GBD) and subsequent cholecystogram if any
All costs in the EUS-GBD arm would be recorded: the cost of EUS-GBD procedure (including the procedure itself, anaesthesia, Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), needle, guidewire), cost of managing complications if any All costs in both arms would be recorded: i. Index admission: the cost of investigations (blood test, imaging), medications, hospital stay ii. Unplanned readmissions: the cost of investigations, medications, reinterventions (cost of procedure and its equipment) iii. Cost of the follow-up clinic visits |
1-year | |
Secondary | Quality of life assessment | EQ-5D on admission (before randomisation) and at every follow-up clinic visit | 1-year | |
Secondary | Clinical success | Clinical success is defined as improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory test (i.e. liver function test and complete blood count) | 1-year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04156711 -
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing Acute Minor Abdominal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02130245 -
Acute Cholecystitis: Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Randomized Prospective Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01942356 -
Evaluation of Closed-loop TIVA Propofol, Sufentanil and Ketamine Guided by BIS Monitor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04995380 -
Validation and Comparison of Scores for Prediction of RIsk for Post-operative Major Morbidity After Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (SPRIMACC)
|
||
Completed |
NCT03999645 -
Is it Safe to do Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis up to Seven Days?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03296280 -
Evaluation of Implementation of a National Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training Program
|
||
Completed |
NCT03002051 -
EUS-guided Transenteric Drainage With a Novel Lumen-apposing Metal Stent
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00447304 -
Acute Cholecystitis - Early Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Antibiotic Therapy and Delayed Elective Cholecystectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04346550 -
Comparison of Morbidity After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acutely Inflamed Gall Bladder With and Without Drain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04197908 -
EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage Instead of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. A Feasibility Study.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02027402 -
Effects of Drainage in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01706068 -
Transient ECG Changes in Patients With Acute Biliary Disease
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04633512 -
Safety and Feasibility of ActivSightTM in Human
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04672902 -
Treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome
|
||
Completed |
NCT03122054 -
Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05732480 -
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
|
||
Completed |
NCT04308265 -
Scoring System in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06287112 -
Prevention of Acute Cholecystitis With ETGBD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05709548 -
Use of Indocyanine Green in Acute Cholecystitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06459323 -
the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Within and Beyond the First 72 Hours, Does it Differ?!
|
N/A |