Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04314531
Other study ID # TILD-19-19
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date July 1, 2020
Est. completion date December 2024

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab compared to placebo in anti-TNF naïve subjects with active PsA .


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 292
Est. completion date December 2024
Est. primary completion date September 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject has provided written informed consent. 2. Subject is = 18 years of age at time of Screening. 3. Subject has a diagnosis of active PsA for at least 6 months before the first administration of the study agent and has active PsA at Screening or Baseline. 4. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP Ab) negative. 5. Subjects must have no prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent(s) use for the treatment of PsO or PsA. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The subject has a planned surgical intervention between Baseline and the Week 52 evaluation for a pretreatment condition. 2. Subject has an active infection or history of infections as follows: - any active infection for which systemic anti-infectives were used within 28 days prior to first IMP dose, with the last dose having been received within 7 days of Screening, - a serious infection, defined as requiring hospitalization or intravenous (IV) anti-infectives within 8 weeks prior to the first IMP dose, with the last dose having been received within 7 days of Screening, - recurrent or chronic infections, e.g., chronic pyelonephritis, chronic osteomyelitis, bronchiectasis, or other active infection that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might cause this study to be detrimental to the subject. 3. Subject has any concurrent medical condition or uncontrolled, clinically significant systemic disease (e.g., renal failure, heart failure, hypertension, liver disease, diabetes, or anemia) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could cause this study to be detrimental to the subject. 4. Subject has a known history of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus. 5. Subject had myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months prior to the first IMP dose. 6. Subject has any active malignancy, including evidence of cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma. 7. Subjects with a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the previous 2 years. 8. Female subjects of childbearing potential who do not agree to abstain from heterosexual activity or practice a dual method of contraception, for example, a combination of the following: (1) oral contraceptive, depo progesterone, or intrauterine device; and (2) a barrier method (condom or diaphragm). Male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential who are not using birth control as described above must use a barrier method of contraception (e.g., condom) if not surgically sterile (i.e., vasectomy). Contraceptive methods must be practiced upon signing the Informed Consent and through 24 weeks after the last dose of IMP. If a subject discontinues prematurely, the contraceptive method must be practiced for 17 weeks following final administration of IMP. A follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) test should be performed to confirm menopause (per reference values of the laboratory) for those women with no menses for less than 1 year. 9. Subject currently enrolled in another investigational device/procedure or drug study, or Baseline of this study is less than 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) since ending another investigational device/procedure or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s). 10. Subject previously has been enrolled (randomized) in this study. 11. Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures. 12. Donation or loss of 400 milliliter (mL) or more of blood within 8 weeks before first dose of IMP. 13. Subjects who have been placed in an institution on official or judicial orders. 14. Subjects who are related to or dependent on the Investigator, Sponsor, or study site such that a conflict of interest could arise.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
TILD
one 1 mL injection of study medication
matching placebo injections
one 1 mL injection of placebo

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Sunpharma Site 101 Fitzroy Victoria
Australia Sunpharma site no. 08 Hobart Tasmania
Australia Sunpharma Site 16 Maroochydore Queensland
Australia Sunpharma Site 39 Phillip Australian Capital Territory
Czechia Sunpharma Site 64 Brno
Czechia Sunpharma Site 97 Prague 2
Czechia Sunpharma Site 102 Praha 4
Czechia Sunpharma Site 63 Zlín
Germany Sunpharma Site 73 Berlin
Germany Sunpharma Site 92 Herne
India Sunpharma Site 110 Bangalore Karnataka
India Sunpharma Site 107 Belgaum Karnataka
India Sunpharma Site 109 Hubli Karnataka
India Sunpharma Site 112 Hyderabad Telangana
India Sunpharma Site 106 Lucknow Uttar Pradesh
India Sunpharma Site 108 Pune Maharashtra
India Sunpharma Site 111 Surat Gujarat
Japan Sunpharma Site 90 Itabashi Tokyo
Japan Sunpharma Site 89 Kitakyushu Fukuoka
Japan Sunpharma Site 22 Kitakyushu-shi
Japan Sunpharma Site 88 Kumamoto
Japan Sunpharma Site 91 Mitaka Tokyo
Japan Sunpharma Site 24 Miyazaki-shi Miyazaki
Japan Sunpharma Site 84 Nagoya Aichi
Japan Sunpharma Site 87 Osaka
Japan Sunpharma Site 86 Sendai Miyagi
Japan Sunpharma Site 85 Shinjuku Tokyo
Japan Sunpharma Site 23 Tsu-shi
Korea, Republic of Sunpharma Site 104 Daejeon
Korea, Republic of Sunpharma Site 21 Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Sunpharma Site 18 Incheon
Korea, Republic of Sunpharma Site 19 Seoul
Korea, Republic of Sunpharma Site 20 Seoul
Poland Sunpharma Site 93 Bialystok
Poland Sunpharma Site 95 Bialystok
Poland Sunpharma Site 94 Lublin
Poland Sunpharma Site 74 Poznan
Poland Sunpharma Site 96 Warszawa
Spain Sunpharma Site 71 Córdoba
Spain Sunpharma Site 75 La Coruña
Spain Sunpharma Site 100 Madrid
Spain Sunpharma Site 72 Sevilla
Spain Sunpharma Site 76 Valencia
United States Sunpharma site no. 12 Covina California
United States Sunpharma site no. 11 Greenville South Carolina
United States Sunpharma site no. 14 Lake Charles Louisiana
United States Sunpharma site no. 10 Lincoln Nebraska
United States Sunpharma site no. 09 Lubbock Texas
United States Sunpharma site no. 04 Miami Beach Florida
United States Sunpharma site no. 02 New Port Richey Florida
United States Sunpharma site no. 03 San Antonio Texas
United States Sunpharma site no. 06 Spokane Washington
United States Sunpharma site no. 05 Springfield Missouri
United States Sunpharma site no. 07 Tamarac Florida
United States Sunpharma site no. 01 Tomball Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Czechia,  Germany,  India,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Poland,  Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR20] the proportion of subjects achieving a 20% reduction from Baseline in response criteria exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR50] the proportion of subjects achieving a 50% reduction from Baseline in response criteria exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR70] the proportion of subjects achieving a 70% reduction from Baseline in response criteria exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other he change from Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score Tender Joint Count (68), Swollen Joint Count (66), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The change from Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index, Leeds Dactylitis Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The proportion of subjects who achieve a Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein < 3.2 exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The proportion of subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area = 3% with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 exclusive of Weeks 24 and 52
Other The change from Baseline in the levels of "Metabolic Biomarkers" at Week 24
Other the change from baseline in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 and Week 52
Other proportion of subjects who achieve a response based on Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Responder Criteria (PsARC) at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 and Week 52.
Other change from baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Scores at Week 12,16 24, 48 and 52.
Other change from baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Week 8,16, 24 and 52.
Primary The proportion of subjects who achieve American College of Rheumatology [ACR20] the proportion of subjects achieving a 20% reduction from Baseline in response criteria at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR50] the proportion of subjects achieving a 50% reduction from Baseline in response criteria at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR70] the proportion of subjects achieving a 70% reduction from Baseline in response criteria at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 response among subjects with body surface area =3% at baseline at Weeks 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score at Week 16
Secondary The Change from Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score Tender Joint Count (68), Swollen Joint Count (66), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects who achieve a Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein < 3.2 at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified Sharp sub-scores (erosion score and joint space narrowing score) at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects with the Change in van der Heijde modified total Sharp score <0 and < 0.5 Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area =3% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in anti-tumor necrosis factor naïve subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area = 3% (those with involvement of nails) Physician Global Assessment-Psoriasis and nail psoriasis severity index at Week 24
Secondary The proportion of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology [ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70] the proportion of subjects achieving a 20/50/70% reduction from Baseline in response criteria at Week 52
Secondary The change from Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score Tender Joint Count (68), Swollen Joint Count (66), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (Visual Analog Scale, 0-100), C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels at week 52
Secondary change from Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at Week 52
Secondary The change from Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index, Leeds Dactylitis Index and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score at Week 52
Secondary The proportion of subjects who achieve a Disease Activity Score(28 [joints]-C-reactive protein) < 3.2 at Week 52
Secondary The change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total Sharp score at Week 52
Secondary The change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified Sharp sub-scores (erosion score and joint space narrowing score) at Week 52
Secondary The proportion of subjects with the change in van der Heijde modified total Sharp score <0 and < 0.5 at Week 52
Secondary In anti-tumor necrosis factor naïve subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area =3%, the proportion of subjects with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 at Week 52
Secondary In anti-tumor necrosis factor naïve subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area =3% those with involvement of nails, the change from Baseline in nail psoriasis severity index at Week 52
Secondary In anti-tumor necrosis factor naïve subjects with active Psoriasis and body surface area =3%, the change from Baseline in Physician Global Assessment-Psoriasis at week 52
Secondary Change from baseline in health assessment questionnaire - disability index (HAQ-DI) score at Week 24
Secondary The change from Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components measured timepoints
Secondary The change from Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scores at week 24
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03357471 - Study to Test the Safe and Effective Use of an e-Device for the Self-injection of Certolizumab Pegol Solution by Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis, Active Ankylosing Spondylitis, Active Psoriatic Arthritis, or Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04314544 - Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis I (INSPIRE 1) Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT05499416 - Effect of Bimekizumab in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris and Active Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04876781 - Korean Post-marketing Surveillance for Xeljanz XR
Completed NCT02980692 - Efficacy and Safety Study of SUNPG1623 Phase 2
Completed NCT03881059 - Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986165 Compared With Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Phase 2