Prospective RELOC-AGE: How Do Housing Choices and Relocation Matter for Active Ageing?

Active Ageing Clinical Trial

— RELOC-AGE  

Official title:

Prospective RELOC-AGE: How Do Housing Choices and Relocation Matter for Active Ageing?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04765696
• Other study ID #: 2020-03457
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Start date: March 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2029

Study information

• Verified date: October 2023
• Source: Lund University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation. All data collection will be conducted at baseline and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years of follow-up.

Description:

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation.

Research Questions

1. What aspects of housing, health and participation predict a) relocation to different housing options in the ordinary housing stock; b) residential care facilities; c) remaining in the present dwelling?

2. How is the complex interaction between objective and perceived aspects of housing, health and participation associated with active ageing, and what are the patterns and characteristics of such dynamics?

3. What housing attributes do people aged 55+ considering relocation find important, and to what extent, when making their decisions on housing preferences?

4. How do people aged 55+ considering relocation reason a) regarding different housing options; b) motives for considering and effectuating relocation, and; c) to what extent are their motives fulfilled?

The sample will include people aged 55+ considering relocation. Recruitment will be made from a sub-sample based on waiting lists (n=22 000) among three housing companies in Sweden: Karlshamnsbostäder AB, Örebrobostäder AB, and Riksbyggen. The expected final sample size is n=3000. Quantitative data will be collected through a web survey and one telephone interview at baseline (2021) and by a web survey at follow-ups 2022, 2024, 2026 and 2028. Data on primary and secondary outcomes are based on established questionnaires used in previous research on older people, health, and housing as well as in national public health surveys in Sweden. In addition to primary and secondary outcomes (presented below), the surveys include demographic and socioeconomic characteristics including civil status, education level, economic situation, occupational status, holding a driver license, critical life events (e.g., death of spouse, long-term disease, divorce), original nationality; questions about present housing situation (dwelling characteristics (e.g., type and size of dwelling, location) and neighborhood characteristics (e.g., access to services and green areas), potential and realized mobility, social/cohabiting situation, time spent at home, housing adaptations); use of technical aids for mobility, use of health, social and informal care, thoughts about future housing, reasons related to consideration about relocating and moving intentions. Data on stated preferences in relation to housing will be collected in a specific survey based on a discrete choice methodology. Qualitative interviews will be conducted consecutively with a subsample (n=100) of respondents who have relocated during the follow-up period. Further, linking to register data will be made within the scope of Register RELOC-AGE, which is another part of the larger project.

For quantitative data, descriptive, exploratory, and inferential statistics will be used. For longitudinal analyses, generalized linear models or Cox regression with time-dependent covariates will be applied. Throughout, we will control for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and other potential confounders and compare the results across different cohorts. Quantitative analyses will be conducted using standard statistical software. For analyses of DCE data, we will use the conditional logit model (also referred to as the multinomial logit model) as the reference model, but the analysis will be extended to mixed logit and latent class models to take preference heterogeneity into account. Qualitative interviews will be audio-recorded and transc¬ribed verbatim and principles from Grounded Theory will be used for the analysis.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 1964
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2029
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2028
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 55 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Persons 55 years or older, living in Sweden, listed for relocation at any of the three housing companies Karlshamnsbostäder and Örebrobostäder (public housing companies) and Riksbyggen (a condominium provider)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Severe cognitive impairments or insufficient language skills to give informed consent and participate in telephone interviews

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Active Ageing

Intervention

Other:
• No intervention is administered
No intervention is administered, the cohort is followed in order to evaluate the impact of housing and relocation on active ageing outcomes.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Sweden	Active and Healthy Ageing Research Group, Department of Health Sciences Lund University	Lund

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Lund University	Karlshamnsbostäder AB, Ribbingska Foundation in Lund, Riksbyggen, Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, The Swedish Research Council

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Sweden, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)	17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)	Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 12 months
Primary	University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)	17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)	Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 24 months
Secondary	Life-space mobility	6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)	Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 12 months
Secondary	Life-space mobility	6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)	Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 24 months
Secondary	Meaning of home	28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)	Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 12 months
Secondary	Meaning of home	28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)	Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 24 months
Secondary	Housing related control beliefs	24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)	Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 12 months
Secondary	Housing related control beliefs	24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)	Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 24 months
Secondary	Usability in my home	4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)	Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 12 months
Secondary	Usability in my home	4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)	Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 24 months
Secondary	Housing satisfaction	One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)	Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 12 months
Secondary	Housing satisfaction	One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)	Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 24 months
Secondary	Health-related Quality of life	EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)	Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 12 months
Secondary	Health-related Quality of life	EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)	Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 24 months
Secondary	Self-rated health	One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)	Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 12 months
Secondary	Self-rated health	One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)	Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 24 months
Secondary	Life satisfaction	One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)	Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 12 months
Secondary	Life satisfaction	One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)	Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 24 months
Secondary	Housing enabler, functional limitations	8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations	Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 12 months
Secondary	Housing enabler, functional limitations	8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations	Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 24 months
Secondary	General self-efficacy	10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)	Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 12 months
Secondary	General self-efficacy	10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)	Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 24 months
Secondary	Physical exercise	Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more	Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 12 months
Secondary	Physical exercise	Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more	Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 24 months
Secondary	Physical activity	Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more	Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 12 months
Secondary	Physical activity	Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more	Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 24 months
Secondary	Frailty (FRESCH)	4 items to be answered yes or no	Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 12 months
Secondary	Frailty (FRESCH)	4 items to be answered yes or no	Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 24 months
Secondary	Satisfaction with mobility opportunities	One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)	Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 12 months
Secondary	Satisfaction with mobility opportunities	One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)	Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 24 months

External Links

•   Project website