Actinic Keratoses Clinical Trial
— COAKSOfficial title:
A Single-center, Randomized Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Dose-ranging Decentralised Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daily Field-directed Topical Applications of AVX001 Silicone-based Gel in Doses of 1% or 3% in Adult Subjects With Multiple Actinic Keratosis Lesions Olsen Grade 1 or 2
Verified date | January 2022 |
Source | Coegin Pharma AB |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Actinic keratosis (AK), also known as solar keratosis, is a common skin condition characterised by abnormal growth of skin cells caused by long-term sun exposure. AK is considered to be a precancerous lesion, and is therefore commonly treated to reduce the risk of malignant transformation into skin cancer. The trial is a randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose-comparison trial in which adult subjects with AK grade 1 or 2 will be treated with AVX001 silicone-based gel in doses of 1% or 3% or with a gel vehicle for a 4-week field-directed treatment period. Subjects will be followed up for 8 weeks after the treatment period. The primary objective is to evaluate the local tolerability of daily applications of AVX001 gel in doses of 1% or 3% and compare with vehicle.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | March 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Signed and dated informed consent 2. = 18 years of age 3. Fluent in Danish 4. Clinical AK diagnosis confirmed by PI. 5. Present an area of 25cm2 with 4 to 8 AK lesions located in face, neck or chest AK lesions in target area severity grade 1 or 2 as defined by the Olsen clinical Criteria for AK 6. Able to and willing to follow trial procedures including application of AVX001 and using the Study App. 7. Have a suitable smartphone to complete the trial tasks (Android operating system: Android 8.1 or higher; iPhone with iOS 12.4 or higher) 8. Female subjects must either be of non-childbearing potential (either be surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation) or post-menopausal) or must be using a highly effective method of contraception. Contraception must be maintained for the duration of the study. - A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. - A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a post-menopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy. However in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a single FSH measurement is insufficient. (CTFG 2020) - For women not taking hormonal contraception with amenorrhea for less than 12 months and just a single FSH measurement in postmenopausal range, a decision can be made by the PI whether it is appropriate for them to undergo a confirmatory FSH measurement or commence a highly effective method of birth control - Highly effective methods of birth control are defined as those, alone or in combination, that result in a low failure rate (less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. (ICH 2009) Such methods include: - Combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation : oral, intravaginal, transdermal - Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, injectable, implantable - Intrauterine device (IUD) - Intrauterine hormone-releasing system ( IUS) - Bilateral tubal occlusion - Vasectomised partner. - Sexual abstinence. Exclusion Criteria: 1. AK lesions classified as Olsen grade 3 in target area 2. Atypical AK lesions in the target area, including suspected SCC or BCC 3. Under suspicion of, or current skin cancer diagnosis in the target area. subjects who had BCC, SCC or melanoma and have completed curative therapy at least 12 months prior to screening and are in remission can be considered to participate in the trial by investigator's discretion 4. Any dermatological condition in the target area that can be exacerbated by treatment or affect trial assessments, including but not limited to psoriasis vulgaris AD, rosacea, urticaria, scabies, and herpes simplex 5. Received immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs including but not limited to methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, oral retinoids, 6 months prior to baseline visit. 6. Received systemic corticosteroids including but not limited to betamethasone, prednisone, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone (except if via inhale or intranasal delivery) 6 months prior to baseline visit. 7. Received lesion or field directed therapy within 2 cm of the target area for trial treatment one month prior to baseline visit, including topical drugs, including but not limited to - topical fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate and diclofenac. - destructive therapies, including but not limited to surgery, cryotherapy, dermabrasion, and photodynamic therapy - field ablation treatments, including but not limited to chemical peels, laser resurfacing 8. Recipient of organ transplant including but not limited to bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart 9. Any unstable neurological or psychiatric disorder based on the investigator's opinion which has the potential to affect the safety of the subject, influence on trial objectives or impede the subject's ability to complete the trial. 10. History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening or any condition associated with poor compliance at the investigator's discretion 11. Received treatment with any non-approved drug substance within the last 4 weeks prior to baseline visit. 12. Known allergy or intolerance to fish, shellfish or fish oil 13. Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial or participation in any clinical trial treatments 4 weeks prior to enrolment. 14. Subject is pregnant or lactating |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Denmark | Bispebjerg Hospital | Copenhagen | Zealand |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Coegin Pharma AB | Bispebjerg Hospital, Studies&Me |
Denmark,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Changes in AK-FAS , as evaluated by the Central Assessors on the smartphone photos taken by the subjects. | From Baseline to EOT and EOS | ||
Other | The level of agreement between AK-FAS in-clinic, and AK-FAS performed remotely by Central Assessors using smartphone photos taken by the subjects | From Baseline to End of Study | ||
Other | Proportion of subjects presenting with an LSR>2, as evaluated by the Central Assessors on the smartphone photos taken by the subjects | from Baseline to EOT, and EOS | ||
Other | Proportion of subjects who experience LSR grade 1, 2, 3 and 4, as evaluated by the Central Assessors on the smartphone photos taken by the subjects | from Baseline to EOS | ||
Other | Time to reach a clinically visible clearance of target area of >50% for all enrolled subjects performed from remote by Central Assessors using smartphone photos taken by the subjects. | From Baseline to End of Study | ||
Other | Presence of AK-related skin changes evaluated by non-invasive optical imaging | At baseline and EOS | ||
Primary | Proportion of subjects with local skin reaction (LSR) >2 | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on frequency of SAEs | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on frequency of AEs | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on skin examinations | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on blood pressure (vital sign) | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on pulse (vital sign) | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Assessment of safety based on temperature (vital sign) | Baseline to end of study (12 weeks) | ||
Secondary | Proportion of subjects who experience LSR grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 | Baseline to End of Treatment and End of Study (week 4) | ||
Secondary | Proportion of subjects experiencing a clinically visible clearance of target area of >50% as assessed in-clinic | Baseline to the end of treatment visit (EOT) (week 4) / early termination. | ||
Secondary | Proportion of subjects experiencing a clinically visible clearance of target area of >50% as assessed in-clinic | Baseline to the end of the study visit (EOS, week 12). | ||
Secondary | Recurrence rate of AKs as assessed in-clinic after treatment clearance | Between End of Treatment (week 4) and End of Study visits (week 12). | ||
Secondary | Appearance of new lesions in the target area as assessed in-clinic | From Baseline to EOS (week 12) | ||
Secondary | Subject satisfaction with the AVX001 gel, assessed by TSQM | at Week 2 and EOT (week 4). | ||
Secondary | Proportion of patients with a cosmetic outcome grade <2 , as assessed using the Cosmetic Scoring Tool. | from Baseline to EOS (week 12) | ||
Secondary | Cosmetic outcome of target area as evaluated by participants by comparing the status at EOS with a baseline photo | Baseline and End of Study (week 12) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03575780 -
Single-Center Study Evaluating Systemic Exposure and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on the Face or Balding Scalp in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04085367 -
Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% Cream (CD06809-41) Versus Vehicle Cream for Actinic Keratosis of the Face
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05937529 -
Impact of Madecassoside and 5 % Panthenol Cream in Post Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02520700 -
A Comparison of White-light and Daylight Topical Methyl 5-aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01538901 -
Imiquimod Versus Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses in Organ Transplant Recipients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01354717 -
Bioequivalence Study of Generic Fluorouracil 0.5% Cream and 0.5% Carac® and Placebo
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00742391 -
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses (AKs) on the Non Head Locations
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03285477 -
A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on AK on Face or Scalp
|
Phase 3 | |
Suspended |
NCT03963102 -
Duration of Ameluz Application in Acral Actinic Keratoses Response
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05923060 -
Imaging Techniques to Monitor Photosensitizer and sO2 Levels During Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT06026358 -
Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Back of the Hands
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02622594 -
Bilateral Comparison of Treatment of Facial Actinic Keratoses Using Microneedling and Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Versus Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Using Two Incubation Times
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00774787 -
Topical Imiquimod Cream in Combination With Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00786994 -
The Efficacy and Tolerability of Oleogel-S-10 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00544258 -
Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Extent of Systemic Absorption of PEP005
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04024579 -
Treatment of Actinic Keratosis With 5% KOH Solution
|
||
Completed |
NCT04843553 -
Nicotinamide for Prevention of Pre-malignant Actinic Keratosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03315286 -
Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03279328 -
Evaluating Skin Appearance Following 5-Flourouracil Cream for Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and the Effects of Topical Agents
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02062853 -
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Pilot Study Evaluating the Utility of an Educational Video
|
N/A |