Actinic Keratoses Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Three-arm, Parallel-group, Multiple-dose, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Therapeutic Equivalence of Fluorouracil Cream USP 5% of Encube Ethicals Pvt. Ltd., India Compared With Fluorouracil 5% Topical Cream of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morgantown, WV 26505 U.S.A. in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis
Verified date | March 2023 |
Source | Encube Ethicals Pvt. Ltd. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Fluorouracil is recommended for the topical treatment of multiple actinic or solar keratoses. In the 5% strength, it is also useful in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinomas when conventional methods are impractical, such as with multiple lesions or difficult treatment sites.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 458 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | November 1, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Willing and able to provide voluntary informed consent and follow the protocol requirements - Males or females at least 18 years of age - Subjects with at least five (5) and no more than ten (10) clinically typical, visible, discrete, AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter on the face or bald scalp. In this interpretation, if the total number of lesions on the face and bald scalp exceeds 10 and there are either 5-10 lesions on the face or 5-10 lesions on the bald scalp then select the designated treatment area that has 5-10 lesions (i.e., face or bald scalp) - Skin pigmentation (Fitzpatrick skin type I, II, and III) that will allow differentiation of erythema assessment - Females of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or lactating at Visit 1 (as confirmed by a negative urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of less than 50 mIU/mL or equivalent units of human chorionic gonadotropin) - Women of childbearing potential must agree to the use of a reliable method of contraception (e.g., total abstinence, intrauterine device, a double barrier method, oral, transdermal, injected, or implanted nonhormonal or hormonal contraceptive) throughout the study. Female patients using hormonal contraceptives should have been on the same product/dosing regimen for at least 28 days before Visit 1 and should not change this regimen during the study. A sterile sexual partner is not considered an adequate form of birth control. Exclusion Criteria: - Known hypersensitivity or allergy to Fluorouracil or any of the excipients in the Test, Reference or Placebo products - Presence of atopic dermatitis, basal cell carcinoma, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, squamous cell carcinoma, or other possible confounding skin conditions on the face or bald scalp - Use within 6 months before Visit 1 on the face or bald scalp of 1) chemical peel, 2) dermabrasion, 3) laser abrasion, 4) PUVA (psoralen plus ultraviolet A) therapy, or 5) ultraviolet B therapy - Use within 1 month before Visit 1 on the face or scalp of 1) cryo destruction or chemo destruction, 2) curettage, 3) photodynamic therapy, 4) surgical excision, 5) topical 5-fluorouracil, 6) topical corticosteroids 7) topical diclofenac, 8) topical imiquimod, 9) topical retinoids, or 10) other treatments for AK including glycolic acid or over-the-counter products containing retinol, alpha or beta hydroxy acids - Use within 1 month before Visit 1 of 1) immunomodulators or immunosuppressive therapies, 2) interferon, 3) oral or injectable corticosteroids, or 4) cytotoxic drugs - Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme deficiency - Inability to understand the requirements of the study and the relative information or are unable or not willing to comply with the study protocol - Employees of the Investigator or research center or their immediate family members - Patients who have participated in this study previously - Patient lived in the same household as currently enrolled subject |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 005 | Bakersfield | California |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 006 | Cerritos | California |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 004 | Lauderdale Lakes | Florida |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 001 | Miami | Florida |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 002 | Miami | Florida |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 003 | Miramar | Florida |
United States | CBCC Global Research Site 007 | Sugarloaf | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Encube Ethicals Pvt. Ltd. | CBCC Global Research |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Therapeutic equivalence with Reference product | Therapeutic equivalence will be evaluated for the primary endpoint at Visit 4 in the PP population. If the 90% confidence interval on the absolute difference between the proportion of subjects who are considered a complete cure in the Test and the Reference product groups (pT - pR) is contained within [-20%, +20%], then therapeutic equivalence of the Test product to the Reference product will be considered to have been demonstrated | 6 weeks | |
Primary | Superiority to Placebo | The superiority of the Test and Reference products against the Placebo product will be evaluated for the primary endpoint at Visit 4 in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population using the last observation carried forward (LOCF). If the proportion of subjects who are considered a complete cure in the Test and the Reference product groups is numerically and statistically superior to that of the Placebo (p < 0.05; using a two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test, stratified by clinical site), then the superiority of the Test and Reference products over Placebo will be concluded | 6 weeks | |
Primary | Primary Efficacy End Point | The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with treatment success, defined as 100% clearance of all AK lesions (baseline or target AK lesions and any new AK lesions) within the designated treatment area (i.e., complete cure), assessed at study Week 6 (Day 43 ± 4, which is 4 weeks after completion of 2 weeks of treatment) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Safety Analysis | All Safety analysis will be based on the Safety population. Adverse events will be classified using standard MedDRA terminology Version 24.0 or higher and summarized by treatment group. Summary tables comparing the type, incidence, date of onset, date of resolution, severity, action taken, outcome, and Investigator's opinion of relationship to the study product will be prepared by treatment group. If sufficient data exist, AE frequencies will be compared between treatments using Fisher's exact test. If the global Fisher's exact test is statistically significant among the three treatment groups at the 5% alpha level (i.e., p < 0.05), then Fisher's exact test using only the Test and Reference groups may be performed to identify any potential statistically significant differences that are clinically relevant between the two active treatment groups | 6 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03575780 -
Single-Center Study Evaluating Systemic Exposure and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on the Face or Balding Scalp in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04085367 -
Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% Cream (CD06809-41) Versus Vehicle Cream for Actinic Keratosis of the Face
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05937529 -
Impact of Madecassoside and 5 % Panthenol Cream in Post Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02520700 -
A Comparison of White-light and Daylight Topical Methyl 5-aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01538901 -
Imiquimod Versus Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses in Organ Transplant Recipients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01354717 -
Bioequivalence Study of Generic Fluorouracil 0.5% Cream and 0.5% Carac® and Placebo
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00742391 -
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses (AKs) on the Non Head Locations
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03285477 -
A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on AK on Face or Scalp
|
Phase 3 | |
Suspended |
NCT03963102 -
Duration of Ameluz Application in Acral Actinic Keratoses Response
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05923060 -
Imaging Techniques to Monitor Photosensitizer and sO2 Levels During Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT06026358 -
Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Back of the Hands
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02622594 -
Bilateral Comparison of Treatment of Facial Actinic Keratoses Using Microneedling and Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Versus Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid and Blue Light Using Two Incubation Times
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00774787 -
Topical Imiquimod Cream in Combination With Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00786994 -
The Efficacy and Tolerability of Oleogel-S-10 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00544258 -
Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Extent of Systemic Absorption of PEP005
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04024579 -
Treatment of Actinic Keratosis With 5% KOH Solution
|
||
Completed |
NCT04843553 -
Nicotinamide for Prevention of Pre-malignant Actinic Keratosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03315286 -
Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03279328 -
Evaluating Skin Appearance Following 5-Flourouracil Cream for Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and the Effects of Topical Agents
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02062853 -
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Pilot Study Evaluating the Utility of an Educational Video
|
N/A |