Actinic Cheilitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Levulan and Blue Light for the Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis
NCT number | NCT02409732 |
Other study ID # | D15043 28525 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 4 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 2015 |
Est. completion date | July 2017 |
Verified date | October 2018 |
Source | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDT with blue light and topical Levulan in the treatment of actinic cheilitis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 24 |
Est. completion date | July 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form - Must be male or female = 18 years of age at the time of consent - Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements - Must have a diagnosis of actinic cheilitis by histopathological evaluation of biopsy specimen or clinical presentation Exclusion Criteria: - Inability to provide voluntarily consent or mentally incompetent - Active herpes labialis lesions - Subjects with any condition which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study, or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study - Subjects with any other skin condition that might affect the evaluation of the study disease - Pregnant or breastfeeding female subjects - Subjects who have used any investigational medication within one month prior to study entry - Subjects who have been previously exposed to PDT and/or topical Levulan therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis - Subjects who have used local therapy (e.g. cryotherapy) or topical treatment (e.g. 5% fluorouracil) within three months of study entry - Subjects who have used an oral photosensitizing drug (e.g. Declomycin) within six months of study entry - Subjects who are currently using photosensitizing agents (e.g. thiazides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, phenothiazines, and sulfonamides) because of the risk of augmented photosensitivity - Subjects who are frequently exposed to ultraviolet radiation (e.g. lifeguards, construction workers, frequent sunbed users, etc.) - Subjects with a history of cutaneous photosensitization, porphyria, hypersensitivity to porphyrins, or photodermatosis - Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to Levulan - Subjects who are immunocompromised |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
United States,
Ribeiro CF, Souza FH, Jordão JM, Haendchen LC, Mesquita L, Schmitt JV, Faucz LL. Photodynamic therapy in actinic cheilitis: clinical and anatomopathological evaluation of 19 patients. An Bras Dermatol. 2012 May-Jun;87(3):418-23. — View Citation
Zaiac M, Clement A. Treatment of actinic cheilitis by photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid and blue light activation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Nov;10(11):1240-5. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With a Change in Clearance From Baseline | Clearance will be estimated clinically as minimal (0%-25%), mild (26%-50%), moderate (51%-75%), good (76%-99%), or complete (100%). Results will also be evaluated by comparing photographs before and immediately after treatments, and 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment. | Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36) | |
Secondary | Average Change in Participant Reported Pain | Subject reported pain before, during and after blue light illumination was documented using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The maximum change in pain is 10 for each occurrence (pain before compared to during treatment and pain during compared to after treatment). This is multiplied by the number of subjects and then divided by the number of treatments to generate the range. The summation of the change between subject reported pain prior to compared to during blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. The summation of the change between subject reported pain during compared to after blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. | Baseline to Week 36 | |
Secondary | Average Change in Local Skin Reactions to Blue Light Treatment | Assessments of swelling, erythema, and flaking/scaling were conducted after each treatment and two days post-treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The average change in swelling, erythema and flaking/scaling after each treatment and two days post treatment were divided by the 50 total treatments to obtain the average value. | Baseline to Week 36 | |
Secondary | The Number of Participants Who Developed a Local Skin Reaction to Blue Light Treatment: Vesiculation/Pustulation, Erosion/Ulceration, Crusting and Hyperpigmentation | Assessments of vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration, and crusting were conducted immediately after each blue light treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The presence or absence of hyperpigmentation in the treatment area was also documented after each treatment visit. The total number of participants who developed a local skin reaction is documented. | Baseline to Week 36 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Evaluation of any reported local or systemic events outside the treatment area and other than those specified under local skin reactions or PDT reactions. | Baseline to Week 36 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT03224715 -
Actinic Cheilitis Pre-Treated With DNA Repair Enzyme Cream
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03990636 -
Photodynamic Therapy With Metil 5-aminolevulinate for Actinic Cheilitis - Phase 2 Clinical Trial
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04219358 -
Topical Application of Imiquimod Gel at Different Concentrations in Actinic Cheilitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00849992 -
Treatment Study for Actinic Cheilitis Comparing Imiquimod 5% and Photodynamic Therapy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06321003 -
SYsteMatical Trained learnIng aLgorithms for Oral carcInogenesiS Interpretation by Optical Coherence Tomography
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04744103 -
Trichloroacetic Acid as a Topical Treatment for Actinic Cheilitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00868088 -
Photodynamic Therapy to Treat Actinic Damage in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Lip
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02198469 -
Study of Methyl Aminolaevulinate Photodynamic Therapy With and Without Er:YAG Laser in Actinic Cheilitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03452566 -
Evaluation of Ingenol Mebutate for Actinic Cheilitis Treatment
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |