Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 1.5 mg/kg Per Day of Sarecycline Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Verified date | January 2019 |
Source | Almirall, S.A. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an approximate 1.5 mg/kg/day dose of oral sarecycline compared to placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1034 |
Est. completion date | January 12, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | January 12, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 9 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Signed informed consent or assent form - Male/female, 9 to 45 years of age, inclusive - Body weight between 33 and 136 kg, inclusive - Facial acne vulgaris with: - 20-50 inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules and nodules) - 30-100 noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) - No more than 2 nodules - Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of moderate (3) or severe (4) - Negative urine pregnancy test at baseline - females of childbearing potential - Agrees to use an effective method of contraception throughout the study - Refrain from use of any other acne medications and medicated cleansers, and avoid excessive sun exposure and tanning booths for duration of study - Able to fulfill the requirements of protocol, indicated willingness to participate in the study and agrees to all study procedures (including mandatory photography) by providing written informed consent/assent and an authorization to disclose protected health information (PHI). Exclusion Criteria: - Has a dermatological condition of the face that could interfere with the clinical evaluations - Has a history of any of the following: - Allergy to tetracycline-class antibiotics or to any ingredient in the study drug - Pseudomembranous colitis or antibiotic-associated colitis - Treated for any type of cancer within the last 6 months - Has known resistance to other tetracyclines - Has receive any of the following treatments within 12 weeks of screening: - Systemic retinoids - Systemic corticosteroids - Androgens/anti-androgenic therapy (eg, anabolic steroids, spironolactone) - Non-medicated procedures for the treatment of acne (eg, laser, light or ThermaClear) - Has used any acne affecting treatment without an appropriate washout period - Has initiated hormonal contraceptive use within 12 weeks prior to screening or plans to initiate or switch hormonal contraceptive products during the study period - Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the study period - Has any other disorder causing hyperandrogenism including, but not limited to polycystic ovary syndrome, adrenal or ovarian tumors, Cushings disease or congenital adrenal hyperplasia - Has drug-induced acne - Has significant intercurrent illness, psychiatric disposition or other factors that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Medical Monitor, precludes participation in the study - Is currently participating, or has participated within 30 days prior to the screening period in an investigational drug or device study - Has previously participated in any clinical trial involving the use of sarecycline - Is judged by the Investigator to be unsuitable for any reason. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #239) | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #252) | Arlington | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #237) | Aventura | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #205) | Bay City | Michigan |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #218) | Beachwood | Ohio |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #245) | Carlsbad | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #210) | Champaign | Illinois |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #251) | Clarkston | Michigan |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #226) | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #235) | Clinton Township | Michigan |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #220) | College Station | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #222) | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #234) | Encinitas | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #227) | Fort Gratiot | Michigan |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #219) | Fountain Inn | South Carolina |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #209) | Fremont | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #221) | Fridley | Minnesota |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #225) | Goodlettsville | Tennessee |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #236) | Hot Springs | Arkansas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #238) | Jupiter | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #201) | Katy | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #216) | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #255) | Lauderdale Lakes | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #213) | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #232) | Madison | Wisconsin |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #202) | Miami | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #249) | Miami | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #211) | Miramar | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #206) | Mobile | Alabama |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #208) | New York | New York |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #253) | Newington | New Hampshire |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #244) | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #247) | Ocala | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #215) | Oceanside | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #231) | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #241) | Orlando | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #223) | Pflugerville | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #256) | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #228) | Pinellas Park | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #229) | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #240) | Rochester | New York |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #217) | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #207) | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #204) | San Diego | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #254) | San Diego | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #257) | Santa Ana | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #243) | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #246) | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #242) | Snellville | Georgia |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #230) | Stony Brook | New York |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #203) | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #233) | Walla Walla | Washington |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #214) | Warwick | Rhode Island |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #248) | Watertown | Massachusetts |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #224) | Webster | Texas |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #212) | West Jordan | Utah |
United States | Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #250) | Wilmington | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Almirall, S.A. | Allergan |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scale Success at Week 12 | The investigator assessed the participant's inflammatory lesions on the face using the IGA 5-point scale. The scale ranges from 0 (best): clear, no evidence of papules or pustules to 4 (worst): severe, inflammatory lesions are more apparent, many papules/pustules, there may or may not be a few nodulocytic lesions. Success was defined as at least a 2-point decrease (improvement) from Baseline on the IGA assessment as well as a score of clear (0) or almost clear (1). The percentage of participants who achieved success is reported. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 | Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Facial inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, and nodular lesions) were counted and recorded separately. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04321070 -
Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05755256 -
The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05131373 -
Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01445301 -
Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03303170 -
Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04698239 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02886715 -
A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02924428 -
Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02535871 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02709902 -
Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02491060 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02525822 -
Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02250430 -
A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02913001 -
The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01769664 -
A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01694810 -
Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01727440 -
Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01194375 -
A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00991198 -
The Role of Topically Dissolved Oxygen (TDO) to Ameliorate Signs of Photodamage
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02524665 -
8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne
|
Phase 4 |