Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01313728
Other study ID # CA-P-7966
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received March 10, 2011
Last updated February 14, 2012
Start date December 2010
Est. completion date January 2011

Study information

Verified date February 2012
Source Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is to see if there's any difference in the amount of facial irritation when two acne products are used together on one side of the face, compared to one acne treatment product used alone on the other side of the face. All people participating in this trial will be required to return to the same study center every weekday for two weeks for the investigator to check for irritation on the face and to have the products applied - on weekends they will have to put them on at home. If one side of the face is more irritated than the other side, a picture will be taken as well.


Description:

This is an investigator-blind, randomized, balanced study comparing two treatment regimens in a split-face model. All subjects will apply Retin-A Micro Gel (tretinoin) 0.1 % Pump, and Aczone Gel (dapsone) 5% daily to one side of the face (with 1 hour between applications, applying Aczone Gel first) and Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1 % Pump to the other side of the face in a randomized scheme for two consecutive weeks. Subjects will return to the study center daily for evaluation and for application of both products (weekend applications will be done at home). At each visit the subject will be evaluated and scored for irritation and cutaneous treatment effects. Subjects presenting with differences in irritation between one side of the face and the other will be photographed and have chromometer readings taken. A single treatment center is expected to enroll at least 24 subjects.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 26
Est. completion date January 2011
Est. primary completion date December 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator

- Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start

- Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study

- If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study

- Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator

- Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions

- Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Tretinoin Gel
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Skin Study Center Broomall Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
Primary Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
Secondary Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging Ordinal burning/stinging scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
Secondary Subject Assessment - Itching Ordinal itching scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
Secondary Subject Assessment - Tightness Ordinal tightness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
Secondary Facial Tolerance All interval measurements were combined for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Facial tolerance is the sum of scores from Erythema, Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Itching, and Tightness assessments, reported in Outcome Measures 1-5. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 6250 (highest possible combined score of 25, times 10 days, times 25 subjects). Baseline to 2 Weeks No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04321070 - Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05755256 - The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne Phase 2
Completed NCT05131373 - Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01445301 - Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT03303170 - Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT04698239 - Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions. N/A
Completed NCT02886715 - A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Terminated NCT02924428 - Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02535871 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02491060 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02525822 - Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT02709902 - Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT02250430 - A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204 Phase 1
Completed NCT02913001 - The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne N/A
Completed NCT01769664 - A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01694810 - Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01727440 - Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment N/A
Completed NCT01194375 - A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT01706250 - U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™ Phase 4
Completed NCT02524665 - 8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne Phase 4

External Links