Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Single-blind, Randomized, Comparative Pilot Study Evaluating the Tolerability of Two Topical Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of topical combination therapies in the treatment of facial acne.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 48 |
Est. completion date | July 2009 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 21 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female subjects at least 21 years of age, in good general health with documented diagnosis of acne vulgaris. - Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception Abstinence is considered an acceptable method of contraception. - Inflammatory (papules and pustules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) facial lesions. - The ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study - Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol specific procedures are performed Exclusion Criteria: - Female subjects who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding. - Subjects who have any clinically relevant finding at their baseline physical other than acne vulgaris. - History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms. - Use of topical antibiotics or anti-acne medications on the face and systemic antibiotics within the past 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. - Use of topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks. Use of inhaled, intra-articular or intra-lesional (other than for facial acne lesions) steroids is acceptable. - Use of systemic retinoids within the past 6 months. - Facial procedures performed by an esthetician, beautician, physician, nurse, or other practitioner, within the past 4 weeks or during the conduct of the study. - Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components, lincomycin, adapalene, clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide or excipients of the study product. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Centro de Investigación y Prevencion de Enfermidades Cardiovasculares | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | LUMIPIEL - Centro Dermatológico | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | Buenos Aires Skin | Ciudad de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Stiefel, a GSK Company | GlaxoSmithKline |
Argentina,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Erythema (Redness) | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Primary | Skin Dryness | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Primary | Skin Peeling | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3,Intense. |
Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Primary | Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Erythema (Redness) | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Skin Dryness | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Skin Peeling | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Irritant/Allergic Contact Dermatitis | Signs and symptoms of tolerability (erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis)on the face. Erythema, peeling, dryness, and irritant/allergic contact dermatitis were graded using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Slight; 2, Moderate; 3, Intense. |
Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Investigators Static Global Assessment | ISGA is evaluated using the following scale: 0, Clear: Clear skin with no lesions; 1, Almost Clear: Rare non-inflammatory lesions; 2, Mild: Some non-inflammatory lesions with no more than a few inflammatory lesions but no nodular lesions); 3, Moderate: Up to many non-inflammatory lesions and may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than 1 small nodular lesion; 4, Severe: Up to many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodular lesions; 5, Very Severe: Many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions and more than a few nodular lesions. May have cystic lesions. | Baseline, Weeks 5, 8 | No |
Secondary | Total Acne Lesion Counts | Total acne lesion counts - includes both inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules), noninflammatory lesions (whiteheads and blackheads), | Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts | Total number of inflammatory acne lesions (pustules, papules) at each timepoint. | Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Non-inflammatory Acne Lesion Counts | Total number of non-inflammatory acne lesions (whiteheads and blackheads) at each timepoint. | Baseline, Weeks 5 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QoL) - Symptomatic Domain | Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The symptomatic score (score=0 to 28)=(sum of the 7 individual item scores) * 100/28. | Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Quality of Life Questionnaire - Emotional Domain | Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The emotional score (score=0 to 40)=(sum of the 10 individual item scores) * 100/40. | Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Quality of Life Questionnaire - Functional Domain | Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. The functional score (score=0 to 48)=(sum of the 12 individual item scores) * 100/48. | Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Quality of Life Questionnaire - Global Score | Skindex-29 is a self-administered (by participants at each time point) QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items (it.) scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 it.); symptomatic (7 it.); functional (12 it.). Domain scores range from 0 to 40, 0 to 28, and 0 to 48, respectively. Lower scores=better QoL. A Global Score (range 0-100)=(sum of all 29 individual item scores) * 100/116. | Baseline, Weeks 2 and 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Redness at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Dryness at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Burning at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Itching at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Severity of Scaling at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Very minimal; 2, Mild; 3, Moderate; 4, Severe; 5, Very Severe. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Application of Product at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Very easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comfort of Skin at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Comfortable; 2, Comfortable; 3, Somewhat Comfortable; 4, Somewhat Uncomfortable; 5, Uncomfortable. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Which Study Product is Subject More Satisfied With? at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following choices: Epiduo, Clindoxyl Gel, Both Treatments Equally. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Comparison of Study Products Used in the Past at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, More Satisfied; 2, Somewhat More Satisfied; 3, Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied; 4, Somewhat More Dissatisfied; 5, More Dissatisfied. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, Uncomfortable. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Decrease of Acne Breakouts by Study Products at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire was completed by the subject at week 8 using the following scale: 1, Highly Favorable; 2, Favorable; 3, Neutral; 4, Unfavorable; 5, More Dissatisfied. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Compliant at all; 1, Mostly Compliant; 2, Very Compliant. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Compliance at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at week 8 by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you use the product every day?. When only one product was applied to the face, subjects were asked to rate their compliance by answering the aforementioned question, rather than rating compliance on a 0-2 scale. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product? | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Feeling of Hydrated and Moisturized Skin at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: Did you feel that your skin was hydrated and moisturized while you were on your study product? | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product? | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Use of Study Product if Choice to Continue Acne Treatment at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at 8 week timepoint by answering Yes or No to the following question: If you were to choose to continue treatment for your acne, would you use the study product? | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use Wtih Make-Up at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Ease of Use With Make-Up at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 0, Not Applicable; 1, Very Easy; 2, Easy; 3, Neutral; 4, Difficult; 5, Very Difficult. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Weeks 1 and 2 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied. | Weeks 1 and 2 | No |
Secondary | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire - Overall Satisfaction of Study Product at Week 8 | Product Acceptability and Preference Questionnaire were completed by the subject at each timepoint using the following scale: 1, Very Satisfied; 2, Satisfied; 3, Neutral; 4, Unsatisfied; 5, Very Unsatisfied. | Week 8 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04321070 -
Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05755256 -
The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05131373 -
Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01445301 -
Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03303170 -
Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04698239 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02886715 -
A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02924428 -
Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02709902 -
Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02535871 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02491060 -
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02525822 -
Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02913001 -
The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02250430 -
A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01694810 -
Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01769664 -
A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01727440 -
Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01194375 -
A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01706250 -
U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00991198 -
The Role of Topically Dissolved Oxygen (TDO) to Ameliorate Signs of Photodamage
|
Phase 2 |