Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00446043
Other study ID # RD.06.SPR.18089
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date February 17, 2004
Est. completion date May 23, 2005

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source Galderma R&D
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This was a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative study that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy profile of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel. Subjects were evaluated at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Safety was evaluated by spontaneous reports of Adverse Events (AEs), the Local Tolerability Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, and Stinging/Burning), routine laboratory testing (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of suspected sensitizations. Efficacy was evaluated by analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts, and by the Subject's Assessment of Acne.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 452
Est. completion date May 23, 2005
Est. primary completion date May 23, 2005
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - A clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with facial involvement. - A minimum of 20 but not more than 50 Inflammatory lesions. - A minimum of 30 but not more than 100 Noninflammatory lesions. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with presence of nodules or cysts. - Acne conglobate, acne fulminans, secondary acne, or severe acne. - Underlying diseases that required the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy. - Use of prohibited medications prior to the study unless appropriate washout period was documented.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide
Adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 % (W/W) gel topically daily in the evening.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Phoebe Rich, MD Portland Oregon

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Galderma R&D

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Sep;49(3 Suppl):S200-10. doi: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)01154-x. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory and Total Lesion Count at Month 12 LOCF Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Baseline, Month 12 LOCF
Primary Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 6 Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse. At Month 6
Primary Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 12 Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse. At Month 12
Secondary Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Erythema Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Secondary Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Scaling Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production). Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Secondary Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Dryness Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness). Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Secondary Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Stinging/Burning Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort). Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Secondary Number of Participant With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Baseline up to Month 14
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported. Baseline up to Month 14
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04321070 - Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05755256 - The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne Phase 2
Completed NCT05131373 - Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01445301 - Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT03303170 - Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT04698239 - Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions. N/A
Completed NCT02886715 - A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Terminated NCT02924428 - Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02535871 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Completed NCT02709902 - Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02525822 - Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02491060 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Completed NCT02250430 - A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204 Phase 1
Completed NCT02913001 - The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne N/A
Completed NCT01769664 - A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01694810 - Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01727440 - Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment N/A
Completed NCT01194375 - A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT01706250 - U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™ Phase 4
Completed NCT02524665 - 8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne Phase 4