Acne Scars Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Clinical Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of An Alexandrite Laser Device For The Treatment Of Acne Scars
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | Cynosure, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The intended use of the Alexandrite laser device used in this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Alexandrite laser device for the treatment of acne scars on skin types V and VI.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 39 |
Est. completion date | August 2, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - A healthy male or female 18 - 65 years of age. - Has acne scars on the face (left, right, or front) and willing to undergo treatments with the study device. - Is a skin type V or VI. - Understands and accepts obligation not to receive any other procedures on the treatment area through the length of the study. - Understands and accepts the obligation and is logistically able to be present for all visits. - Is willing to comply with all requirements of the study and sign the informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: - Is pregnant or of childbearing potential and not using medically effective birth control, or has been pregnant in the last 3 months, currently breast feeding or planning a pregnancy during the study. - The subject is hypersensitive to light in the near infrared wavelength region. - The subject takes medication which is known to increase sensitivity to sunlight. - The subject has seizure disorders triggered by light. - The subject takes or has taken oral isotretinoin, such as Accutane®, within the last six months. - The subject has an active localized or systemic infection, or an open wound in area being treated. - The subject has a significant systemic illness, such as lupus, or an illness localized in area being treated. - The subject has common acquired nevi that are predisposed to the development of malignant melanoma. - The subject has herpes simplex in the area being treated. - The subject is receiving or has received gold therapy. - The subject is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device trial, or has received an investigational drug or been treated with an investigational device within in the area to be treated 6 months to entering this study. - The subject has any condition or is in a situation which in the investigators opinion may put the subject at significant risk, may confound study results or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation. Cautionary Criteria: - The subject has had unprotected sun exposure within four weeks of treatment, including the use of tanning beds or tanning products, such as creams, lotions and sprays. - The subject has a history of immunosuppression/immune deficiency or an auto-immune disorder. - The subject has a coagulation disorder or currently using anticoagulation medication, including heavy use of aspirin. - The subject is taking medications that alter the wound-healing response or evidence of compromised wound healing. - The subject is known to have a history of keloid formation. - The subject has a history of skin cancer or suspicious lesions in the treatment area. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Wallace Skin and Body Institute | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cynosure, Inc. |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Photographic Evaluation of Changes in Treatment Areas | Photographic evaluation with ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading comparing pre-treatment images to the 90 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. This scale gives higher scores based on the number of scars, with the description of the scars determining the weighting factor. The scale ranges from 0 to 540, with a lower score meaning less severe scarring. | Baseline and 90 day follow up | |
Secondary | Photographic Evaluation of Treatment Areas | Photographic evaluation with ECCA (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) grading comparing pre-treatment images to the 30 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. This scale gives higher scores based on the number of scars, with the description of the scars determining the weighting factor. The scale ranges from 0 to 540, with a lower score meaning less severe scarring. | Baseline and 30 day follow up | |
Secondary | Blinded evaluation of pre-treatment images vs. follow up images to determine which image is which | Blind identification of pre-treatment images vs. 30 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. | Baseline and 30 day follow up | |
Secondary | Blinded evaluation of pre-treatment images vs. follow up images to determine which image is which | Blind identification of pre-treatment images vs. 90 day follow up images performed by independent reviewers. | Baseline and 90 day follow up | |
Secondary | Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) | Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) at the 30 day follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse." | Baseline and 30 day follow up | |
Secondary | Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) | Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) at the 90 day follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse." | Baseline and 90 day follow up | |
Secondary | Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) | Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at the 30 follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse." | Baseline and 30 day follow up | |
Secondary | Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) | Subject assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) at the 90 follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse." | Baseline and 90 day follow up | |
Secondary | Subject satisfaction | Subject satisfaction rates at the 30 day follow up visit. The subject satisfaction scale ranges from 1 to 6, with 1 being extremely unsatisfied, 2 being dissatisfied, 3 being slightly unsatisfied, 4 being slightly satisfied, 5 being satisfied, and 6 being extremely satisfied. | 30 day follow up | |
Secondary | Subject satisfaction | Subject satisfaction rates at the 90 day follow up visit. The subject satisfaction scale ranges from 1 to 6, with 1 being extremely unsatisfied, 2 being dissatisfied, 3 being slightly unsatisfied, 4 being slightly satisfied, 5 being satisfied, and 6 being extremely satisfied. | 90 day follow up |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05097157 -
Study To Assess A Radiofrequency Microneedling Device For Dermatologic Conditions
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01696513 -
Effect of Subcision and Suction on Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01115634 -
Autologous Fibroblast Transplantation in Facial Deformities
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05254210 -
Feasibility Study To Collect Safety And Preliminary Efficacy Data For A Radiofrequency Microneedling Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05102617 -
Post Market Usability Evaluation Of The PicoSure Pro Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02103816 -
The Smartlipo Triplex 1440nm Wavelength Laser and the Sidelaze 800 Hand Piece for the Treatment of Facial Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01221922 -
Laser Treatment of Acne Scars in Fitzpatrick Skin Types III-VI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03767153 -
Clinical Evaluation of Fractional Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Acne Scarring
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00974870 -
A Pilot Study Testing the Efficacy of a Needling Device for the Treatment of Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05579171 -
Lasers to Aid in Treatment of Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02145364 -
Ultherapy® for the Treatment of Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02126657 -
The Efficacy and Safety of a Single 70% Glycolic Acid Peel With Vitamin C for the Treatment of Acne Scars
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01847066 -
Epidermal Delivery of Ani-Aging Ingredients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03850925 -
Comparison of Picosecond Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser and Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02955381 -
Restylane Silk Acne Scar Efficacy Evaluation Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01213199 -
Adapalene Gel 0.3% in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03380845 -
Comparison of 1,550-nm Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Ethnic Skin
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03901417 -
Comparison of 1550nm Fractional Laser Alone Versus in Combination With Microneedling for the Treatment of Acne Scars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03522922 -
Efficacy of Microneedling With Topical Vitamin C in Treatment of Acne Scarring
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05987319 -
Feasibility Study to Collect and Assess Safety Data for a Radiofrequency Microneedling Device for Electrocoagulation and Hemostasis of Soft Tissues for Dermatologic Conditions
|
N/A |