TheTreatment of Acne Scar Using UltraPulse CO2 Laser

Acne Scar Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Single-Blinded Split Face Prospective Study Comparing Different Energy, Efficacy, and Safety of UltraPulse CO2 Laser in the Treatment of Acne Scar Using Antera Quantitative 3D Image Analysis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04648995
• Other study ID #: N202007052
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 11, 2020
• Est. completion date: November 28, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: November 2020
• Source: Haute Beauté Skin & Vein Clinic
• Contact: Kuo-Liang Cheng, MD
• Phone: +886-28787-2112
• Email: dermacarl[@]hotmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Purpose of the study is to assess the effect and evaluate topographic volume changes of UltraPulse at treating boxcar scars with different energy and the effect of UltraPulse at treating icepick scars.

Description:

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo a 24 hour screening period to determine eligibility for study entry. Upon enrollment, patient who fulfill all the inclusion criteria and does not fulfill any exclusion criteria will be scheduled for their visits. All subjects will be receiving two sessions of treatment, with the two sessions 8-12 weeks apart. Subjects' face will be divided to left and right, with each side randomized to receive a low versus high energy setting. In the low energy setting side of the face, central base of boxcar scar will be treated with 20mJ, while shoulder of scar will be treated with 50 mJ. In the high energy setting side of the face, central base of boxcar scar will be treated with 30mJ, while shoulder of scar will be treated with 60 mJ. Subject will be blinded regarding which side of the face received low versus high energy setting. Ultrasound will be used to assess epidermal and dermal thickness change at the treated area. This will be performed before the 1st and 2nd treatment session as well as one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session. Antera Quantitative 3D Image Analysis will be performed before and after the 1st and 2nd treatment session as well as one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session. 3mm punch biopsy will be taken from 10 volunteers over bilateral face before the 1st treatment session and 3 month after the 2nd treatment session (total of 4 sample will be obtained in each volunteer). Skin specimen will be stained with hematoxylin and eosin as well as relevant stain for collagen and elastic fiber. Clinical photograph will be taken before and after the 1st and 2nd treatment session as well as one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session. Two blinded board certified dermatologist will be asked to rate the improvement of acne scar by GSAAS according to the clinical photograph taken. All subjects will be asked to rate their satisfaction regarding treatment response over each side of the face using a 0 to 10 point scale chart.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: November 28, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: September 8, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 20 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects have to be aged from 20 to 60 year-old
• Subjects currently have an area of involvement approximately 2cm × 2cm on each side of the face over the temples or cheek bone area
• Classified as mild to moderate acne scar according to global severity of facial acne scar (GSAAS) score
• After evaluation by clinician, those subjects to be treated with "Lumenis"CO2 Laser System (UltraPulse) can benefit from this laser treatment
• Subjects need to be fully functional and aware of the pros and cons of the study. Subject is capable to make self judgement and sign the inform consent under his/her own will
• Others: Have fully understand about this study and is willing to cooperate with the instruction of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Those who were known to have keloid formation
• Those who have porphyria or known photosensitivity
• Those who previously underwent laser therapy treatment or skin biopsy and have showed poor result or adverse effect
• Those who were classified as "severe" according to GSAAS system
• Those who have bleeding tendency
• Those who present with clinical data suggesting abnormal platelet function or coagulation disorder (such as prolonged aPTT or PT)
• Those that are currently taking anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs
• Those who are on aspirin or other NSAIDs
• Those who have history of granulomatous or connective tissue disease
• Female subjects with a positive pregnancy test
• Women who refuse to stay on effective contraception or refuse pregnancy tests during the study
• After evaluation by the clinician, those that have been enrolled in clinical studies over the past 6 months that may alter the current study result
• After evaluation by the clinician, those currently or had previous treatment of atrophic acne scars with fillers, lasers, deep chemical peels, or any other medical or surgical treatment which in the investigators' opinion could alter the results of the current clinical study
• Those that are currently taking photo-sensitive drugs, oral isotretinoin, iron supplement or other herbal medication
• Those that have received laser treatment over the lesion area over the past 3 months
• Those that are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
• After evaluation by the clinician, and concluded underline epilepsy, area to be treated is under infection or ulceration, poor wound healing)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acne Scar
• Acne Vulgaris

Intervention

Device:
• High energy (UltraPulse)
Half of the face that receives low energy, their central base of boxcar scar will be treated with 30mJ, while shoulder of scar will be treated with 60 mJ
• Low energy (UltraPulse)
Half of the face that receives low energy, their central base of boxcar scar will be treated with 20mJ, while shoulder of scar will be treated with 50 mJ

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	HAUTE BEAUTÉ Skin & Vein Clinic	Taipei

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Haute Beauté Skin & Vein Clinic	Lumenis Ltd., Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (9)

Alster TS, Li MKY. Microneedling of Scars: A Large Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):358-364. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006462. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):1341. — View Citation

Arsiwala SZ, Desai SR. Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser: Optimizing Treatment Outcomes for Pigmented Atrophic Acne Scars in Skin of Color. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2019 Apr-Jun;12(2):85-94. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_171_18. — View Citation

Bhargava S, Kumar U, Varma K. Subcision and Microneedling as an Inexpensive and Safe Combination to Treat Atrophic Acne Scars in Dark Skin: A Prospective Study of 45 Patients at a Tertiary Care Center. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Aug;12(8):18-22. Epub 2019 Aug 1. — View Citation

Dréno B, Thiboutot D, Layton AM, Berson D, Perez M, Kang S; Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne. Large-scale international study enhances understanding of an emerging acne population: adult females. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12757. Epub 2014 Oct 8. — View Citation

Emer J. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): Current Applications in Dermatology. Skin Therapy Lett. 2019 Sep;24(5):1-6. Review. — View Citation

Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Jul;45(1):109-17. Review. — View Citation

Mu YZ, Jiang L, Yang H. The efficacy of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser combined with other therapies in acne scars. Dermatol Ther. 2019 Nov;32(6):e13084. doi: 10.1111/dth.13084. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Review. — View Citation

Petit L, Zugaj D, Bettoli V, Dreno B, Kang S, Tan J, Torres V, Layton AM, Martel P. Validation of 3D skin imaging for objective repeatable quantification of severity of atrophic acne scarring. Skin Res Technol. 2018 Nov;24(4):542-550. doi: 10.1111/srt.12464. Epub 2018 Mar 6. — View Citation

Tanizaki H, Tanioka M, Yamashita Y, Hayashi N. Quantitative evaluation of atrophic acne scars using 3D image analysis with reflected LED light. Skin Res Technol. 2020 Jan;26(1):20-24. doi: 10.1111/srt.12756. Epub 2019 Sep 2. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Topographic volume changes of acne scars from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session	Topographic volume changes of acne scars from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session	from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session
Primary	Histological change in epidermal/dermal component including elastic fiber and collagen synthesis three month after the 2nd treatment session from baseline	Histological change in epidermal/dermal component including elastic fiber and collagen synthesis three month after the 2nd treatment session from baseline	three month after the 2nd treatment session from baseline
Secondary	Access improvement of acne scar by Scale for global severity of facial acne scar from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session in both the low and high energy treated arm	Access improvement of acne scar by Scale for global severity of facial acne scar from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session in both the low and high energy treated arm. The minimum and maximum values of Scale for global severity of facial acne scar are 0 and 5, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.	from baseline one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session
Secondary	Compare the difference of improvement of acne scar by Scale for global severity of facial acne scar in the low versus high energy treated arm	Compare the difference of improvement of acne scar by Scale for global severity of facial acne scar in the low versus high energy treated arm. The minimum and maximum values of Scale for global severity of facial acne scar are 0 and 5, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.	from baseline and three month after the 2nd treatment session
Secondary	Compare the difference of newly synthesis collagen and elastic fiber through staining in the low versus high energy treated arm	Compare the difference of newly synthesis collagen and elastic fiber through staining in the low versus high energy treated arm	from baseline and three month after the 2nd treatment session
Secondary	Assess the frequency and severity of encountered side effects in the low versus high energy treated arm	Assess the frequency and severity of encountered side effects in the low versus high energy treated arm	from baseline and three month after the 2nd treatment session
Secondary	Subjects' satisfaction score rated in a 0 to 10 point scale	Subjects' satisfaction score rated in a 0 to 10 point scale	after the 2nd treatment session?one month and three month after the 2nd treatment session