Acne Prone Skin Clinical Trial
Official title:
Tolerability of a Foaming Facial Cleanser and Moisturizer SPF 30 in a Pediatric Population (7-11) With Acne Prone Skin.
| Verified date | December 2013 |
| Source | Galderma R&D |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine the tolerability of Cetaphil® DermaControl™ Foam Wash and Moisturizer SPF 30 in pediatric subjects (7-11) with acne prone skin.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 35 |
| Est. completion date | June 2013 |
| Est. primary completion date | June 2013 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 7 Years to 11 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male and female subjects 7-11 years of age - Subjects with acne-prone skin [Global severity of acne (GSA) Score of 1 (almost clear) or 2 (mild) and any oiliness evaluation score or GSA Score of 0 (none) with an oiliness evaluation score greater than or equal to 1 (mild)] Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with any visible skin condition or facial hair that could interfere with the evaluations - Subjects taking other medications, supplements, or non-prescription treatments that, in the opinion of the principal investigator/board certified dermatologist, could interfere with the test results including any regimen of steroidal/non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antihistamines - Subjects currently under the treatment for asthma or diabetes (insulin-dependent only) - Subjects with abnormal pigmented vascular skin lesions, abnormal skin pigmentation, or body art (tattoos, permanent or temporary) on the face, which could interfere with subsequent evaluations of dermal responsiveness |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | RCTS, Inc. | Irving | Texas |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Galderma R&D |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Visual Inspection - Erythema | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Erythema: 0 = none, no observable redness; 1 = very mild, slight redness, spotty or diffuse; 2 = mild, moderate redness; 3 = moderate, intense; 4 = severe, fiery red with edema. | Week 3 | |
| Primary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Visual Inspection - Edema | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Edema: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = intense. | Week 3 | |
| Primary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Visual Inspection - Dryness | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Dryness: 0 = no observable scaling; 1 = fine flakes/scaling; 2 = moderate flakes/scaling; 3 = larger flakes/severe scaling. | Week 3 | |
| Primary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Visual Inspection - Roughness | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Roughness: 1 - no roughness, skin is fine, silky smooth, 2 - firm (not too rough, not too smooth), 3 - coarse, rough skin, 4 - leathery, flaky skin. | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Subject and Parent/Legally Authorized Representative Interview - Itching | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Itching: 0 = none, no itching; 1 = mild, slight itching, not really bothersome; 2 = moderate, definite itching that is somewhat bothersome; 3 = severe, intense itching that may interrupt daily activities and/or sleep | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Subject and Parent/Legally Authorized Representative Interview - Burning | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Burning: 0 = none, no burning; 1 = mild, slight burning sensation, not really bothersome; 2 = moderate, definite warm, burning sensation that is somewhat bothersome; 3 = severe, hot burning sensation that causes definite discomfort and may interrupt daily activities and/or sleep | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Subject and Parent/Legally Authorized Representative Interview - Stinging | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Stinging: 0 = none, no stinging; 1 = mild, slight stinging sensation, not really bothersome; 2 = moderate, definite stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome; 3 = severe, stinging sensation that causes definite discomfort and may interrupt daily activities and/or sleep | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Cutaneous Tolerability Based on Subject and Parent/Legally Authorized Representative Interview - Tightness | Cutaneous tolerability based on visual inspection (investigator reported severity scale) was assessed at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Tightness: 0 = none, no tightness; 1 = mild, slight tightness, not really bothersome; 2 = moderate, definite tightness sensation that is somewhat bothersome; 3 = severe, tightness sensation that causes definite discomfort and may interrupt daily activities and/or sleep | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Barrier Function (TEWL) | Barrier function was assessed by measuring transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). TEWL measures water loss through the epidermis (for example, by evaporation). Measuring TEWL is a well-established way to assess the skin's water-barrier function. High TEWL values indicate impaired skin barrier function; low values indicate normal barrier function. | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Hydration (Corneometry) | Hydration was assessed using corneometry at visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8), and visit 3 (day 22). Corneometry measures the hydration status of the skin. An increase in corneometry values indicates an increase in the hydration status of the skin, and vice versa. The test is procedure specific, so results are reported in "arbitrary units." | Week 3 | |
| Secondary | Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire - Face Wash | All subjects used Cetaphil® DermaControl™ Oil Control Foam Wash and Cetaphil® DermaControl™ Oil Control Moisturizer SPF 30 at least once daily for 22 days. Patient satisfaction questions were asked for the face wash at study end (day 22). | Day 22 | |
| Secondary | Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire - Moisturizer | All subjects used Cetaphil® DermaControl™ Oil Control Foam Wash and Cetaphil® DermaControl™ Oil Control Moisturizer SPF 30 at least once daily for 22 days. Patient satisfaction questions were asked for the moisturizer at study end (day 22). | Day 22 |