The Efficacy and Security of the Small Stitch Technique in Emergency Surgery

Abdominal Wall Defect Clinical Trial

— STCU  

Official title:

Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Security of the Small Stitch Technique Versus the Large Stitch Closure Laparotomy Technique in Emergency Surgery

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03765060
• Other study ID #: SL-Stitch
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: December 2020
• Source: Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
• Contact: Tamayo López María Jesús, PhD
• Phone: 686589986
• Email: mtamayolopez[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates the abdominal closure technique in emergency surgery. Half of participants will be perform the classic Large Stitch technique, while the other half will undergo the Small Stitch technique.

Description:

The closure of laparotomy is one of the most important challenges facing the surgeon.

The classic technique of wall closure is the Large Stitch technique that uses monofilament double-strand sutures with a SL/WL (Suture Lengh/Wound Lengh) 4:1 ratio, with a distance to the alba line and between each stitch of 1 cm.

Nowadays, the Small Stitch technique is accepted as the technique of choice for closure of laparotomies in programmed surgery. It is based on a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 2/0 with HR (Half-circle Round body) 26 needle. Stitches should be given with a distance to the alba line of 0'5cm and 0'5 cm of separation between stitches.

There are very few studies about the role of Small Stitch technique in the field of Emergency Surgery where the increased morbidity of the patient and the higher rate of surgical wound infection can play a fundamental role, and could be improved with the use of new abdominal wall closure techniques.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 105
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: December 1, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients over 18 years of age and who provide informed consent to participate in the study.

2. Patients requiring an urgent midline laparotomy with a minimum size of 8 cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior midline laparotomy.

2. Patients with BMI> 45 kg / m2

3. Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)> IV.

4. Patient with an advanced terminal illness with an expectation of life <1 year.

5. Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

6. Patients with coagulopathy: patient previously diagnosed with von Willebrand disease, hemophilia or Immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

7. Immunosuppressed patient: HIV patients in the AIDS phase, chronic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive treatment.

8. Patients with collagen pathology: patient previously diagnosed with Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, homocystinuria and scleroderma.

9. Chemotherapeutic treatment 2 weeks before surgery.

10. Radiotherapy treatment 6 weeks before surgery.

11. Diffuse peritonitis with hemodynamic instability, defined by non-response to fluids prior to surgery or during the surgical process.

12. Pregnant or potentially fertile women, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant, or those who do not wish to use effective contraception (hormonal contraceptives (implantation, patches, oral), and double barrier methods (any double combination of: IUD (intrauterine device), male or female prophylactics with spermicidal gel, diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap).

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Abdominal Wall Defect
• Abdominal Wall Hernia
• Emergencies
• Eventration
• Evisceration; Operation Wound
• Hernia, Ventral

Intervention

Procedure:
• Monomax® 2/0 HR26
It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 2/0 with HR 26 needle. In the technique should be given at least 2 points for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 0'5cm and 0'5 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.
• Monomax® 1 HR48
It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 1 with HR 48 needle. In the technique should be given 1 point for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 1 cm and 1 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio	Sevilla

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (5)

Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1284-6. — View Citation

Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-1019-4. Epub 2012 Nov 11. Review. — View Citation

Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches. Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0775-8. Epub 2011 Jan 30. — View Citation

Millbourn D, Wimo A, Israelsson LA. Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions. Hernia. 2014;18(6):775-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1135-2. Epub 2013 Jul 10. — View Citation

O'Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon. 2003 Feb;1(1):17-22. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by eventration rate	To determine the efficacy of the "Small stitch" technique versus the "Large Stitch" technique in the closure of midline laparotomy with respect to the production of eventration in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery.	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by local complications rate	To determine whether the closure of midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery reduces the local complications of the surgical wound defined by hematoma, seroma or wound infection.	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by evisceration rate	To determine if the closure of the midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery reduces the rate of evisceration.	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by improvement of quality of life	To determine if the closure of a midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery improves the quality of life.	1 year
Secondary	Security of the small stitch technique	To determine the safety of the Small Stitch technique versus the "Large Stitch" technique in the closure of the midline laparotomy with respect to the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, the incidence of side effects related to the treatment and the incidence and the reasons for premature withdrawal of premature patient from the study.	1 year