View clinical trials related to Wounds and Injuries.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to find out if giving certain amino acids to critically injured patients can improve their condition or recovery, and lower their blood sugar and insulin needs. Amino acids are the 'building blocks' of proteins. The amino acid compound used in this study is called alanyl-glutamine dipeptide, also known as Dipeptiven® or glutamine. Glutamine is investigational, meaning not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intravenous use. However, it is approved by many countries in Europe, Asia and South America. Several studies suggest that giving glutamine has certain benefits in patients who need intensive care. In a study done at Emory University Medical Center using the same dose of glutamine, the number of hospital infections was lower in patients who had had cardiac, blood vessel or intestinal surgery compared to similar patients who received standard feedings without glutamine. No side effects were thought to be due to giving glutamine in that small study. This study is only being done at Vanderbilt University. The investigators plan to enroll 24 patients in the Trauma ICU over the next 12 months.
Patients receiving oral anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy are at high risk of hematoma after device implantation. This study intends to examine the efficacy of the TopClosure(c) System in wound healing in these patients.
Anti-aggregation therapy, including treatment with low-dose aspirin (LDA) is an established risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage, including chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH); however evidence guiding the decision to continue or discontinue LDA in patients who have sustained mild head trauma with no sign of injury on CT is lacking. The investigators aim to assess whether continued aspirin treatment increases the risk of CSDH in mild head trauma patients 50 years and older who present with negative head CT. The investigators further aim to use the initial findings to refine the study design, with the goal of performing a larger, multi-institutional study in the future. Over a 12-month period, approximately 100 patients ≥50 years of age on LDA prophylaxis presenting to Hadassah's Emergency Department after sustaining mild head injury, will be examined by the neurosurgeon on call. Those who have no sign of intracranial hemorrhage at clinical or CT examination, and who meet inclusion / exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate in a randomized study. Informed consent will be obtained. Patients will be remotely randomized for continuation or cessation of LDA treatment. Follow-up CT and clinical examination will be performed 3-5 weeks after trauma. The two-proportions test will be used to assess whether there is a statistically significant difference in the rate of CSDH in patients randomized to cessation of LDA therapy and those randomized to continuation of LDA. Relationships between the explanatory the dependent variables will be explored with classical parametric and nonparametric statistical methods, including multivariate analysis, logistic regression, the two proportions test, and the independence test. Several measures of association/correlation between pairs of variables will be analyzed as well. The investigators hypothesize that continuation of LDA will not be associated with increased risk for chronic subdural hematoma, and that cessation of treatment will not be associated with a decrease in chronic subdural hematoma. The investigators further hypothesize that cessation of LDA for this period will not be associated with increased risk for clinically significant cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, thrombotic, of embolic event.
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, to evaluate the efficacy and safety Aliviador compared to Gelol in the relief of signs and symptoms in patients with contusions, sprains, trauma and muscle injury start with less than 24 hours or patients of myalgia, myofascial pain and tendinitis.
Whole body imaging has no role in asymptomatic pediatric trauma patients