External Negative Pressure Dressing System vs. Traditional Wound Dressing for Cesarean Section Incision in Obese Women.

Wound Dehiscence Clinical Trial

Official title:

External Negative Pressure Dressing System (ENPDS) vs. Traditional Wound Dressing for Cesarean Section Incision in Obese Women.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04434820
• Other study ID #: 642357
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 3, 2020
• Est. completion date: February 4, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: February 2021
• Source: Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Obesity is associated with increased cesarean section delivery rates and surgical site infections with associated increased post-operative morbidity, post-operative pain and length of hospital stay. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) technology could be used as a prophylactic measure to reduce surgical site infections in obese women undergoing cesarean section by immediate postoperative application in clean-contaminated, closed surgical incisions.

Description:

Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/ [height (m)] 2) of 30 or greater, is a common medical comorbidity of pregnancy affecting one third of reproductive-aged women. Maternal obesity is also a well-recognized risk factor for dysfunctional labor and cesarean delivery with a cesarean section rate of 33% in obese women with BMI of 30 or greater and 43% in women with BMIs of 40 or greater. Obesity is an independent risk factor for post-operative surgical site infection. The risk of post-cesarean surgical site infection has been shown to double for every 5 unit increase in body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m , occurring in about 10% of obese women undergoing caesarean section despite prophylactic strategies (e.g. antibiotics). This can be explained partly by a decreased blood flow in adipose tissue and an obesity-associated inflammation causing vascular dysfunction, which results in a local hypoxic response. Hypoxia impairs oxidative bacterial killing and leads to an increased risk of surgical site infection. Wound healing is a sequence of physiologic events that include inflammation, epithelialization, fibroplasia, and maturation. Failure of wound healing at the surgical site can lead to seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, incisional hernia and surgical site infection. Surgical site infection SSI according to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is as an infection occurring within 30 days from the operative procedure in the part of the body where the surgery took place, where there is purulent drainage from incision, isolated organisms from the incision, dehiscence or deliberate opening by the surgeon when the patient has at least one sign or symptom of clinical infection: localized pain, edema, erythema, warmth and fever greater than 38 c (unless culture of incision is negative) or there is an abscess or other evidence of infection is found during examination of incision, reoperation, or pathologic or radiologic exam. SSIs is divided into incisional SSI and organ/space SSI. Incisional SSI is further divided into superficial and deep incisional SSI. Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection involves skin or subcutaneous tissue cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, wound healing disruption, or dehiscence. Deep Incisional Surgical Site Infection involves deep soft tissues such as fascia or muscle within incision. Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection involves any part of the anatomy other than the incision. SSI is associated with a maternal mortality rate of up to 3%. Wound complication, even if not accompanied by an infection, is a significant cause of postoperative morbidity following cesarean delivery. In addition to the increased cost of care, there is the inconvenience of therapy, increased postoperative pain and convalescence, as well as difficulty with activities of daily living. It is logical to employ novel risk reducing approaches including negative pressure wound therapy at the time of surgery that may prevent wound complications and to ensure that there is a demonstrable benefit to their use for wound complication prophylaxis. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as a vacuum assisted closure (VAC), involves the controlled application of sub-atmospheric pressure to the local wound environment, using a sealed wound dressing connected to a vacuum to promote healing by primary intention by reducing the risk of hematoma / seroma due to improved lymphatic drainage and reduces the risk of wound dehiscence by decreasing the lateral and shear stress on sutures and decreasing bacterial load and wound fluids and by increasing blood flow, oxygenation, angiogenesis, and epithelialization.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 260
• Est. completion date: February 4, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: February 3, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age: 18 or older
• BMI: 30 or greater
• undergoing Cesarean section through a Pfannenstiel incision

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prolonged Rupture of membranes >18 hours
• Intra amniotic infection
• Severe anemia
• Vasculopathies as in hypertension/pre-eclampsia, pregestational / gestational diabetes mellitus, smoking and substance abuse
• Prolonged steroids therapy as in SLE, ITP
• Intraoperative complications as bladder or bowel injury , placenta previa / accreta, difficult fetal extraction , ovarian cysts, pelvic abscess
• Intra-abdominal or subcutaneous drain

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Wound Dehiscence
• Wounds and Injuries

Intervention

Device:
• External negative pressure dressing system (Yuwell 7E-A portable suction unit)
A portable suction unit that will deliver 125 mm Hg of continuous pressure to the dressing and will remove exudates into a disposable canister for 4 days.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	AinShams maternity hospital	Cairo	Al-Waili

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (8)

Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, Lamont RF, Wu C, Heidemann LN, Ibsen MH, Laursen JB, Ovesen PG, Rorbye C, Tanvig M, Joergensen JS. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):628-635. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15413. Epub 2018 Sep 7. — View Citation

Mark KS, Alger L, Terplan M. Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study. Surg Innov. 2014 Aug;21(4):345-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350613503736. Epub 2013 Sep 20. — View Citation

Orth TA, Gerkovich MM, Heitmann E, Overcash J, Gibbs C, Parrish M. Cesarean Delivery with External Negative Pressure Dressing System: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Surg J (N Y). 2016 Jul 20;2(3):e59-e65. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1585470. eCollection 2016 Jul. — View Citation

Scalise A, Tartaglione C, Bolletta E, Calamita R, Nicoletti G, Pierangeli M, Grassetti L, Di Benedetto G. The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena™ Customizable™: cosmetic and therapeutic results. Int Wound J. 2015 Apr;12(2):218-23. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12370. Epub 2014 Sep 19. — View Citation

Smid MC, Dotters-Katz SK, Grace M, Wright ST, Villers MS, Hardy-Fairbanks A, Stamilio DM. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):969-978. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002259. Review. — View Citation

Todd B. New CDC Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Am J Nurs. 2017 Aug;117(8):17. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000521963.77728.c0. — View Citation

Wells CI, Ratnayake CBB, Perrin J, Pandanaboyana S. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Closed Abdominal Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2779-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6. — View Citation

Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:81-88. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876. eCollection 2017. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	incidence of wound dehiscence	separation of the incision line prior to complete healing resulting in an open wound.	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	post operative pain	post-operative pain assessed by Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale,from 0=no pain to 10=maximal pain	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	length of hospital stay	days spent admitted to the hospital	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	the need for re-admission	if the patient encountered surgical site infection requiring re admission to the hospital	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	further need for additional antibiotics	if the surgical site infection required additional post operative antibiotics	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	peri-incision blistering	if any skin blistering occurs under the occlusive adhesive layer	till 30 days post operative
Secondary	patient mobility	if attachment to a negative pressure pump affects patients mobility	4 days
Secondary	surgical site infection	as defined by the CDC	30 days post operative