Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Study of the CO2RE® Laser Device for Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
Verified date | February 2022 |
Source | Candela Corporation |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Subjects with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) will undergo fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment to the vulvar area. Subjects will be evaluated for changes in clinical signs and architectural changes associated with VLS at designated follow-ups to 1-year post treatment series.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 14 |
Est. completion date | December 17, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | July 30, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Able to read, understand and sign informed consent for study participation; 2. Female subjects with age 18-80 years; 3. Biopsy demonstrates biopsy-proven lichen sclerosus and/or there are characteristic changes for vulvar lichen sclerosus on physical examination; 4. Treatment of LS has been recalcitrant to mid to high-potent topical corticosteroid treatment or subject refuses topical corticosteroid treatment. Recalcitrance to therapy is defined as no response to topical corticosteroids of an adequate potency (i.e. clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment or other steroids) and a sufficient duration (12 weeks of use) or lack of symptomatic control of the disease with a maintenance therapy; 5. Topical corticosteroid treatment, if any, will be continued during the study period; 6. Exogenous hormone treatment, if any, will be continued during the study period (type and dose must stay consistent throughout the study); 7. One or more of the following symptoms: itch; pain unrelated to intercourse; pain, skin tearing or bleeding with intercourse; changes/decrease in sexual function; 8. No breaks, tears or lesions, malodorous discharge or strawberry cervix present on gynecological exam. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of clinically atypical appearing nevi in the area to be treated; 2. Unexplained vaginal bleeding; 3. Active infection, specifically: urinary tract infection, vulvar or vaginal infection (candidiasis, genital herpes/herpes simplex virus, bacterial vaginosis, trichomonas); 4. History of vulvar or any gynecological malignancy, as well as history of pelvic radiation therapy or stem cell transplant; 5. Pelvic organ prolapse > stage 2; 6. Pregnancy or planning pregnancy during the study; 7. Systemic treatment with immuno-modulatory drugs. 8. Use of vaginal dilators during study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | HERmd (formerly Somi Javaid M.D. & Associates) | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Center for Modern Aesthetic Medicine | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Total Dermatology Care Center | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Lumina Med Spa | South Burlington | Vermont |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Candela Corporation |
United States,
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. — View Citation
Salvatore S, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Athanasiou S, Origoni M, Candiani M, Calligaro A, Zerbinati N. Histological study on the effects of microablative fractional CO2 laser on atrophic vaginal tissue: an ex vivo study. Menopause. 2015 Aug;22(8):845-9. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000401. — View Citation
Sheinis M, Selk A. Development of the Adult Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Severity Scale-A Delphi Consensus Exercise for Item Generation. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018 Jan;22(1):66-73. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000361. — View Citation
Stewart K, Javaid S, Schallen KP, Bartlett S, Carlson NA. Fractional CO(2) laser treatment as adjunctive therapy to topical steroids for managing vulvar lichen sclerosus. Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Jan;54(1):138-151. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23476. Epub 2021 Sep 20. — View Citation
Thorstensen KA, Birenbaum DL. Recognition and management of vulvar dermatologic conditions: lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and lichen simplex chronicus. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 May-Jun;57(3):260-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00175.x. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Average Scores for VLS Clinical Signs Present At Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 Months After the Last Treatment as Assessed by the Investigators | Each clinical sign of VLS (loss of elasticity, sclerosis, lichenification, whitening, parchment-like skin, fissures, extent of the disease, erosions, ulcerations, hyperkeratosis, excoriation, telangiectasia) was assessed separately by the investigator, using a 4-point scale (0=not present, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe) for each subject at baseline and follow-ups. For those clinical signs present at baseline (baseline score >0 on severity scale), an average severity grade was calculated at each endpoint to evaluate overall treatment outcome, as follows:
Average severity grade = Sum of all severity grades (0, 1, 2, or 3) for each individual parameter of clinical signs present at baseline for each subject / Number of grades A lower average score means better outcome. |
At Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after the final treatment | |
Primary | Average Scores for VLS Architectural Changes Present At Baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 Months After the Last Treatment as Assessed by the Investigators | Each architectural change of VLS (labial fusion, clitoral hood fusion, narrowing of the introitus, anterior changes, perianal involvement, formation of posterior commissure bands) was assessed separately by the investigator, using a 4-point scale (0=not present, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe) for each subject at baseline and follow-ups. For those architectural changes present at baseline (baseline score >0 on severity scale), an average severity grade was calculated at each endpoint to evaluate overall treatment outcome, as follows:
Average severity grade = Sum of all severity grades (0, 1, 2, or 3) for each individual parameter of architectural changes present at baseline for each subject / Number of grades A lower average score means better outcome. |
Baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sexual Function on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) at 3 Months and 6 Months After the Final Treatment | Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a validated, self-reported 19-item questionnaire that assesses domains of sexual function, including desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The aggregated FSFI score is a sum of weighted answers for each of the 19 items in the questionnaire, with a maximum total score possible of 36.0 (high level of sexual functional) and minimum score of 2.0 (low level of sexual functional). Change = (Follow-up score - Baseline score). Mean change was calculated for all scores at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. | Baseline and 3 months and 6 months after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Subject Satisfaction At the 12-Month Follow-up | Evaluate Subject satisfaction at the 12 months post-last treatment visit, using a satisfaction scale [(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) Uncertain, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied]. The analysis quantify the percentage of Subject satisfaction (score 1 or 2) at the 12-month follow-up. | 12 months after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Treatment Associated Pain Score | Subjects underwent 3-5 monthly treatments and reported discomfort associated with treatment on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain, immediately after each treatment. The outcome presented here is the mean grade of discomfort/pain associated with all treatments. Lower value presents lower treatment-associated discomfort. Since patients received 3-5 monthly treatments these values were collected at each treatment over a period of 2 to 4 months for each patient. | Immediately after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th monthly treatments post baseline |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03961126 -
Evaluation of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Treatment Using Adipose Tissue Associated With Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03686800 -
The Comfort and Adherence of Rivelin® Plain Patches in Vulva Lichen Sclerosus Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05147129 -
Characterizing the Microbiome in Postmenopausal Women With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
||
Completed |
NCT02573883 -
Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06132919 -
Efficacy and Safety of MC2-25 Cream & Vehicle in Women With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus (VLS)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04952961 -
Early Detection of Vulval CAncer Through Self-Examination (EDuCATE): Intervention Study
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01126255 -
Progesterone vs Clobetasol Propionate in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04951206 -
Fractionated CO2 Laser With and Without Clobetasol for Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05250466 -
A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of AI Temperature-controlled Radiofrequency Technology and Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Vulvar Leukoplakia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03926299 -
Clinical Trial to Demonstrate That the Dual Laser Therapy is Effective for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02416531 -
Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Comparison Between Clobetasol Propionate, Photodynamic Therapy and Low-Intensity Laser
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04967170 -
A Study to Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma to Treat Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04134494 -
Laser Treatment for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05251220 -
Efficacy and Safety of the Neodymium Laser in Treatment of Urogenital Tract Diseases in Women
|
||
Completed |
NCT01400022 -
Topical 0.05% Clobetasol Propionate in Vaseline Versus UVA-1 Phototherapy in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06360705 -
StrataMGT for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00757874 -
Tacrolimus Versus Clobetasol Propionate in the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05243563 -
Does Steroid Plus CO2 Laser Improve Lichen Sclerosus Symptoms Compared to Steroids Alone?
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |