Clinical Trials Logo

Vomiting clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Vomiting.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00719173 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Effect of Aprepitant on Cyclophosphamide Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Breast Cancer

NRR
Start date: August 2005
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs, such as aprepitant, may help lessen or prevent nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying aprepitant to see how well it works compared to placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

NCT ID: NCT00717054 Completed - Nausea Clinical Trials

Comparison of Aprepitant Versus Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Start date: February 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue medication, prolonged PACU time, and unplanned hospital admission in patients with high risk for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) treated with oral aprepitant with or without transdermal scopolamine preoperatively.

NCT ID: NCT00716560 Terminated - Metastatic Melanoma Clinical Trials

Nausea and Vomiting In Patients Receiving Consecutive Days of Cisplatin

Start date: May 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to observe the incidence of nausea with systemic chemotherapy that includes consecutive days (more than one day)of cisplatin medication.

NCT ID: NCT00713128 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Evaluation of the Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Receiving Irinotecan-based Therapy

Start date: April 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This is a study to determine how much nausea and or vomiting is caused by irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with colorectal cancer scheduled to receive their first cycle of an irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimen are eligible. Any chemotherapy agents administered in combination with irinotecan must have low-minimal potential to cause nausea and or vomiting. Examples of acceptable regimens would be irinotecan in combination with infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFRI) with or without bevacizumab and irinotecan in combination with cetuximab. Patients who have received prior non-irinotecan-based chemotherapy are eligible providing they experienced no vomiting and no greater than mild nausea with their prior chemotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT00711555 Completed - Nausea Clinical Trials

Emend for Multiple-day Emetogenic Chemotherapy

Start date: November 2005
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study is to assess the effect of Emend (aprepitant) on nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy commonly causes nausea and vomiting and this affects patients' quality of life and attitudes toward treatment. Although nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy has been decreasing due to improved therapy, some patients will still experience this side effect. Therefore, new medications are needed to decrease the amount of nausea and vomiting patients have with chemotherapy. Emend (aprepitant) is a new medication used to treat nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy, but it has only been studied in patients receiving only one dose of chemotherapy that makes most people sick. However, there is little experience with this medication in patients receiving multiple days of chemotherapy that causes nausea and vomiting.

NCT ID: NCT00702442 Completed - Vomiting Clinical Trials

Role of Droperidol in Postoperative Vomiting

Start date: June 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Protocol title: Role of low dose droperidol in postoperative vomiting Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of droperidol to postoperative nausea and vomiting when administrated at the introduction to anesthesia, prior to surgery Design: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study Patient Population: Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older who are scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy No. of Subjects: 100 patients divided into two groups, estimated up to 6 months to enroll Duration of Treatment: Prior operation Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed for 24 hours postoperatively Endpoints: To evaluate the effectiveness of low dose droperidol when administered Prior surgery

NCT ID: NCT00701909 Completed - Nausea Clinical Trials

Pain Medicine for Wound Care Procedures

Start date: June 2008
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized double-blind study to determine if the administration of a small-dose of ketamine (an anesthetic)added to morphine (an opioid) contributes to reducing pain intensity during open wound care procedure (WCP)in patients who have had a traumatic injury and are in an Intensive Care Unit. Patients will be randomized to receive morphine plus saline (a placebo) or morphine plus ketamine before the WCP. The second time the patient is scheduled for WCP (no less than 24 hours), patients will be crossed over to receive the treatment they did not receive the first time. It is hypothesized that patients who receive the combination of morphine and ketamine will have better pain control during the procedure than patients who just receive morphine.

NCT ID: NCT00699894 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Aprepitant PO vs Ondansetron IV for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Start date: June 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) persists as one of the more common complications of surgery. Although rarely life-threatening, it is the postoperative outcome that is most unfavorable to patients, even more undesirable than pain. Orthognathic surgery corrects conditions of the jaws and face related to structure, growth, sleep apnea, bad bite, or congenital malformations. The bones of the face and jaws are cut and placed in a new position. There is a high rate of PONV in orthognathic surgery (56%). It is particularly challenging to the patient as their jaws are kept closed together with wires or elastic bands. Nausea in a patient with restricted mouth opening can be psychologically unnerving and puts them at risk for fluid in their lungs. Gan and colleagues showed a higher efficacy of aprepitant over ondansetron in preventing PONV and nausea severity after open abdominal surgery. From this study, the FDA approved the use of aprepitant for PONV prevention in patients >18 years of age. Gan suggested further investigation in different populations. Our randomized, double-blind, prospective study will compare the efficacy of aprepitant PO versus ondansetron IV in a high risk setting for PONV: adolescents undergoing orthognathic surgery. Our study will involve 200 consecutive, adolescent patients (ages 15-25) who will undergo at least a Le Fort 1 osteotomy (upper jaw surgery) under general anesthesia and require hospital admission for at least one night. We will exclude patients who are currently taking medications that have interactions with aprepitant (pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride), those who have a known vomiting disorder such as bulimia, and those who have vomited for any reason within 24 hours of surgery. The procedure will be performed by 5 surgeons and general anesthesia will be administered by 3 anesthesiologists at one institution. A study coordinator, who will not be involved in the treatment, will create the randomization schedule in order to ensure blindness. The patients will be randomized to either of two groups: 1) aprepitant 40 mg PO 2) ondansetron 4 mg IV. Appropriate verbal and written consent will be obtained by the priniciple investigator or surgeon. On the day of the procedure, all patients will receive a pill (aprepitant or aprepitant placebo) at least 1 hour prior to induction of anesthesia and an IV infusion (ondansetron or saline) over 2-5 minutes prior to intubation. The timing and doses of medications will be consistent with manufacturer's recommendations. An established protocol will ensure every patient will receive the same anesthetic regiment. Patient's fluid status will be closely monitored and hydrated appropriately according to known fluid balance calculations. Efficacy will be assessed based on criteria set by Gan et al and will be based on the presence/absence of a vomiting episode, use of rescue medication and subjective evaluation of nausea. Patients will be monitored continuously in the PACU and on the hospital floor by the caring team (nurse, resident, anesthesiologist, surgeon) for any emetic episode or use of rescue therapy. An emetic episode is defined as an act of vomiting (oral expulsion of stomach contents) or retching (non-productive vomiting). Nausea will be assessed at intervals of 0, 2, 6, 24 hours after surgery with T0 being time of extubation. Patients will rate nausea on a 11-point verbal rating scale, with 0 being "not nausea" to 10 being "the worst nausea." Rescue medication will be offered if the patient has more than one episode of vomiting or retching, if the patient has nausea lasting longer than 15 minutes, or if the patient requests it for established nausea or vomiting.

NCT ID: NCT00696280 Completed - Vomiting Clinical Trials

Observational Study of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting

DelayedNaus
Start date: November 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Delayed emesis following administration of carboplatin-based chemotherapy despite prophylaxis with standard antiemetic prophylaxis (5-HT3 and corticosteroid) remains a clinically significant and distressing problem for patients with cancer. The incidence of delayed emesis appears to be higher in women compared to men.

NCT ID: NCT00695487 Terminated - Nausea Clinical Trials

Does Intravenous Cannabis Reduce Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)?

THC
Start date: July 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators evaluate if intravenously applied THC (Cannabis) reduces postoperative Nausea and vomiting. THC will be given during anesthesia before emergence. We measure how long and how effective it reduces PONV