View clinical trials related to Vomiting.
Filter by:This study will investigate if adding complementary therapies such as acupuncture, massage and reiki to inpatient pediatric care is feasible and what the effects are on outcomes such as patient symptoms, cost, safety, satisfaction and length of stay.
Many patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) despite prophylaxis and treatment with HT3 receptor antagonists such as ondansetron. Involvement of multiple types of receptors and factors may be a reason for inadequate control of PONV with a single agent. Betahistine, a histamine antagonist at H1 receptor and antagonist at H3 receptor, is widely used as a treatment of dizziness. Dizziness is one of the cause of nausea and vomiting. This study is to compare the effects of ondansetron and combined ondansetron and betahistine in preventing PONV in high-risk patients receiving intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common problem after general anesthesia. The incidence can be as high as 80 percent in high-risk patients. Investigators designed this randomized, double- blind, single-center study to compare the efficacy of the combination of dexamethasone with ondansetron and dexamethasone with aprepitant undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical class I-II, age 18-60 years patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were included in this study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium, and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen / air mixture in all patients. Remifentanil was continuously infused during surgery. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the dexamethasone and aprepitant group (group DA, n=35) received 40 mg aprepitant orally 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia and 2 ml saline intravenous (iv) within the last 30 minutes of surgery. Patients in the dexamethasone and ondansetron group (group DO, n=35) received an oral placebo identical to aprepitant 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia and 4 mg ondansetron iv within the last 30 minutes of surgery. All patient received iv 8 mg dexamethasone after induction of anesthesia. PONV and postoperative opioid consumption were assessed for 24 hours postoperatively. The blindly evaluated primary outcome was complete response. The secondary outcomes were incidence of nausea, retching or vomiting, the need of rescue antiemetic and opioid consumption within 24 hours after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's Exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Investigators hypothesized that the antiemetic efficacy of the aprepitant and dexamethasone combination is superior compared with ondansetron and dexamethasone combination following the laparoscopic surgery.
RATIONALE: Polymerized (cross-linked) sucralfate malate paste (ProThelial) may be an effective single therapy approach for the management of chemoradiation mucositis, treating and preventing its occurrence in the oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestine. PURPOSE: This observational multi-phase trial is studying how well polymerized (cross-linked) sucralfate malate paste (ProThelial) works to prevent and treat mucositis in adult patients who are to receive or have received chemo/radiation therapy that have caused or is anticipated to cause mucositis in the oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, small or large intestine. The Phase IV study addresses prevention and treatment in the oral cavity. The Phase I study addresses prevention and treatment in the esophagus, stomach, small and large intestine.
To compare postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and perioperative outcomes of gynecologic patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery after scheduled administration of intravenous Ramosetron during hospital stays. - Randomized controlled arm : Placebo versus Ramosetron injection - Administration schedule : immediate postoperative status, 12 hrs after surgery, 36hrs after surgery
Pediatric research in the management of nausea has been limited by the absence of a reliable method to quantify the intensity of this subjective symptom. In adults, the visual analog scale (VAS) is an accurate tool, but this has not been shown to be reliable in young children. A scale is a series of points made on a line that will be used for measurement; a mark on the far left of the line shows little pain and the mark on the far right means alot of pain.
The primary objective of the study is to examine the efficacy of Ondissolve for the prevention/rescue of Acute and Delayed Phase radiation induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) in patients undergoing single or multiple fraction, emetogenic palliative radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. The study population will be 30 patients seen in the RRRP at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre receiving palliative radiation therapy considered emetogenic for bone metastases. Patients will take the study medication (Ondissolve 8 mg) twice on each day of radiation therapy, at least one hour prior to treatment and repeat approximately 6-8 hours later the same day. Patients undergoing multiple fraction radiation therapy will take Ondissolve on weekends or holidays in between treatment. Secondary objectives include to evaluate key secondary endpoints related to RINV, and to investigate the ease and length of administration of protocol medicine. We hypothesize that Ondissolve will be effective in the prophylaxis of RINV, and the ease of use and administration will provide an appropriate delivery method for those unable to tolerate the oral form of ondansetron.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (0.1 mg and 0.4 mg) combined with 7.5 mg of heavy bupivacaine on postoperative block regression times, postoperative analgesia and the severity of side effects, for inguinal hernia repairs.
The most common toxicity of chemotherapy is nausea and vomiting, and appropriate management of these toxicities can help patients improve tolerance for chemotherapy. Anti-emetics including dopamine antagonist, serotonin antagonist, and substance P antagonist administered to patients according to emetogenic risk of chemotherapeutic drugs. However, patients don't always experience same nausea and vomiting for the same drugs. Therefore, it is important to determine the biomarker to predict chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Some biomarkers studies were done during the chemotherapy. However it is not definite evidence of relations between biomarkers and chemotherapy. We will hope to find any predictive biomarker of CINV.
Nasogastric decompression was routinely used in most major intra-abdominal operations. Nasogastric tube intubation was thought to decrease postoperative ileus (nausea, vomiting, and gastric distension). Would and respiratory complications, and to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leaks after gastrointestinal surgery. However, the necessity of nasogastric decompression following elective abdominal surgery has been increasingly questioned over the last several years. Many clinical studies have suggested that this practice does not provide any benefit but could increase patient discomfort and respiratory complications. Furthermore, meta-analyses have concluded that routine nasogastric decompression is no longer warranted after elective abdominal surgery. Elective abdominal surgery without nasogastric decompression was initially tested and then widely used on patients with colorectal surgery.However, after upper gastrointestinal operations such as gastrectomy, nasogastric has been considered necessary to prevent the consequences of postoperative ileus (anastomotic leakage or leaking from the duodenal stump. Therefore, studies of gastrectomy without nasogastric tube emerged later than those of colectomy. In spite more and more studies reported of no need of nasogastric tube after abdominal operation, no papers reported after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Postulated causes of lack in studies to assess the need of a nasogastric tube after pancreaticoduodenectomy include anticipated prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus caused by PD-related extensive destruction and potential risk of gastric stasis after PD. However, our pilot study of retrospective analysis of postoperative NG drainage amount in 100 patients recently having PD at our hospital showed more than 90% of patients had less than 200cc/day NG drainage amount within postoperative day three. Theoretically, these patients might not need a nasogastric tube after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Therefore, investigators propose a prospective multicenter randomized trial to assess the need of a nasogastric tube after PD.