Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02451176
Other study ID # IRB 14-1571
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 2015
Est. completion date April 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source The Cleveland Clinic
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare the safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of a permanent synthetic mesh versus a biologic prosthesis for the repair of ventral hernias in the setting of clean-contaminated (Class 2) or contaminated (Class 3) surgical procedures. The findings of this study will have a major impact on the field of hernia surgery as it will provide objective guide to mesh selection, optimize surgical approaches for complex ventral hernia repair, and ultimately significantly improve patient outcomes.


Description:

This is a multicenter prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing 253 patients with clean-contaminated (Class 2)or contaminated (Class3) abdominal wall ventral hernias undergoing single staged repair. Soft Mesh by CR Bard, a macroporous monofilament polypropylene permanent mesh will be compared to Strattice mesh by Lifecell, a non-cross linked porcine dermal biologic graft for the single stage open reconstruction of clean-contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. The primary outcome variable will be the absence of surgical site occurence requiring procedural intervention and the absence of a hernia recurrence from the time of surgery up to 24 months of postoperative follow up. Patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair for clean-contamination and contaminated abdominal wall hernias meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized to receive a synthetic mesh or a biologic mesh. Randomization will be carried out using computer-generated randomization blocks at the time of enrollment. Stratified randomized will be used with the strata formulated by medical center then by clean-contaminated or contaminated surgical site class. The Investigator will be blinded to patient randomization assignment until the point of intra-operative device use following final CDC wound classification, whereas patients and co-investigators responsible for data analysis will remain blinded to patient randomization until the conclusion of the study period. As such, a double-blinded study protocol will be maintained. Patients randomized to synthetic mesh will receive SoftMesh™ (CR Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) and those patients randomized to biologic mesh will receive Strattice™ (Lifecell, Branchburg NJ). The use of biologic and synthetic mesh in contaminated fields is considered experimental however the selection of these prosthetics was based on a careful review of the multiple animal models, preclinical data, and our own clinical experience with each of these materials placed in both clean and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Surgical wounds will be classified based on CDC(Centers for Disease Control) criteria and only Class 2 and 3 wounds will be included in this study. Postoperatively patients will be evaluated for signs and symptoms of complications along with presence or absence of Surgical Site Infections per CDC guidelines, presence or absence of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and any procedural interventions required to treat these SSOs, presence or absence of hernia recurrence and any reoperations, length of hospital stay, discharge date, time to return of bowel function and any readmission. Active participation in this study will last for 24 months and will involve one preoperative evaluation visit, one operative procedure visit, and 4 follow up visits. Participants will complete two brief survey questionnaires regarding quality of life, activities and pain. The second outcome will be to demonstrate that a macroporous light-weight polypropylene mesh is more cost effective strategy than a biologic prosthetic in clean-contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction


Other known NCT identifiers
  • NCT01746316

Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 253
Est. completion date April 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date April 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. The subject is > 21 years of age (including women of childbearing age) 2. Scheduled to undergo a planned open single stage reconstruction of a contaminated (CDC wound class2 or 3) abdominal wall defect 3. Ability to undergo general anesthesia 4. Is willing and able to give informed consent 5. Is this a clean-contaminated (Class 2) or contaminated (Class 3) case per CDC Guidelines? 6. Has an estimated parastomal hernia or midline defect size of >9 cm 2 contaminated (CDC wound class 2 or 3) abdominal wall defect by physical /or radiological exam. 7. Can achieve midline fascial closure? 8. Is subject willing to return for scheduled and required study visits? - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients have a defect that the surgeon cannot achieve primary fascial apposition and requires a bridge of mesh. 2. Is the patients BMI over 45 kg/m2? 3. Is the patient currently pregnant? 4. Will undergo a laparoscopic or robotic hernia repair. 5. Do they have a class 1 or 4 wound per CDC Guidelines? 6. Are they on immunosuppression including medically-induced with>10 mg of prednisone/day? 7. Do they have a collagen vascular disorder? 8. Is patient having a prior mesh removed due to a current active mesh infection? (A synthetic mesh that is not incorporated into the tissue, is extracorporeally exposed or has a chronic draining sinus with clear fluid around the material, but not including synthetic mesh incorporated in abdominal wall and not infected) 9. Does the patient have Ascites refractory to medical management? 10. Are they in end stage renal (on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) or pre-existing liver disease (Hepatitis B or C or Total Bilirubin >3.0mg/dl)? 11. Is the patient severely malnourished as defined by serum albumin<2.0g/dl? 12. Do they have a smoking history within 1 month of surgery? 13. Does the patient have an objection to the implantation of porcine products? 14. Is the subject participating in another clinical study? 15. Are unable to undergo successful retro-rectus/preperitoneal mesh placement

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Davol Bard Soft Mesh synthetic
soft mesh synthetic
LifeCell Strattice Reconstructive Tissue Biologic
biologic mesh

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
United States University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville South Carolina
United States Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee
United States Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Michael Rosen

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants With Absence of Surgical Site Occurrence Requiring Procedural Intervention 2 years from surgery
Primary Total Number of Participants With Recurrence of Hernias 2 years post surgery
Secondary Direct Costs Associated With the Use of Either Polypropylene or Biologic Mesh Calculate and compare incremental cost effectiveness ratios for patients undergoing repair of clean-contaminated or contaminated ventral hernias using either polypropylene mesh or biologic mesh 30 days post surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06016426 - Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT05572021 - A Comparison of the Outcomes in Fortiva and Strattice Mesh N/A
Completed NCT02263625 - Regional Differences In Indication for Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed NCT02263599 - Conservative Treatment For Ventral Hernia
Completed NCT02292264 - Risk Factors and Complications of Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed NCT01961687 - A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair. N/A
Completed NCT01325246 - Reoperation Rate Versus Clinical Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03283982 - Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05526209 - Longitudinal Relaxing Incision as a Technique for Recurrence Prevention in Ventral Hernia
Completed NCT04438369 - Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laprascopic Ventral Hernia Repair. N/A
Recruiting NCT04173884 - Video-based Collaborative Learning to Improve Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT02703662 - Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03938688 - Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation N/A
Completed NCT01719718 - The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03342040 - Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04150796 - Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias N/A
Recruiting NCT03222102 - Ventral Hernia Prevention After Liver Transplantation N/A
Completed NCT05610267 - Gentrix® Surgical Matrix for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Ventral Hernia Repair
Terminated NCT01794338 - The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorbable Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients N/A
Completed NCT01886963 - A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair N/A