Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The proposed study will compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated and non-barrier coated ventral hernia repair (VHR) mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances. A subset of the data will be analyzed to compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis. A comprehensive array of health-related risk factors and patient-centered outcomes will be assessed in the investigators diverse patient population for proper multivariate data analysis.

Specific Aim I: To evaluate and compare the adhesion characteristics of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim II: To evaluate and compare the adhesion-related complications and adhesiolysis-related complications of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim III: To determine the comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated ventral hernia repair mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances.

Specific Aim IV: To evaluate and compare the adhesiolysis-related complications of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim V: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01355939
Study type	Observational
Source	Washington University School of Medicine
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 2011
Completion date	January 2015

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06016426` - Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05572021` - A Comparison of the Outcomes in Fortiva and Strattice Mesh	N/A
Completed	`NCT02292264` - Risk Factors and Complications of Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed	`NCT02263599` - Conservative Treatment For Ventral Hernia
Completed	`NCT02263625` - Regional Differences In Indication for Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed	`NCT01961687` - A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair.	N/A
Completed	`NCT01325246` - Reoperation Rate Versus Clinical Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT03283982` - Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05526209` - Longitudinal Relaxing Incision as a Technique for Recurrence Prevention in Ventral Hernia
Completed	`NCT04438369` - Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laprascopic Ventral Hernia Repair.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04173884` - Video-based Collaborative Learning to Improve Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02703662` - Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03938688` - Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation	N/A
Completed	`NCT01719718` - The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT03342040` - Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT04150796` - Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03222102` - Ventral Hernia Prevention After Liver Transplantation	N/A
Completed	`NCT05610267` - Gentrix® Surgical Matrix for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Ventral Hernia Repair
Terminated	`NCT01794338` - The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorbable Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT01886963` - A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms